Hoi,
Please understand that one of the most important aspects do not get caught
in numbers.. Particularly the social aspects are very important. The fact
that people meet is often enough to get to new levels of understanding,
inspiration. This is the reason why people travel all over the world...
Le 23/10/13 00:49, Ori Livneh a écrit :
They added several Wikimedia wikis to their index last month and the
first two reports (dated Oct 1 and Oct 15) are available. The reports
for the desktop site of the English Wikipedia are available here:
Hi, Can you please file this in our bug tracking system at
https://www.bugzilla.wikimedia.org/.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 3:49 AM, Nasir Khan nasir8...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am Nasir, an active contributor of Bengali WIkipedia. I use the email
notifications for the change on my watch list
reported a bug https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
*--
**Nasir Khan Saikat* http://profiles.google.com/nasir8891
www.nasirkhn.com
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:38 PM, K. Peachey p858sn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Can you please file this in our bug tracking system at
Hi, in response to bug 54607 [1], we've changed the semantics of the
mobileformat parameter to action=parse
== Summary ==
Previously, it used to accept strings 'html' or 'wml', later just
'html' and modify the structure of output (see below). This was problematic
because you needed to retrieve
I'm inclined to accept this RFC, except perhaps with minor changes. It
would be nice if I could get some comments on it from someone other
than me or Daniel, but if nobody else has anything to say, I will just
accept it.
-- Tim Starling
On 11/10/13 03:40, Rob Lanphier wrote:
Hi folks,
I
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
I'm inclined to accept this RFC, except perhaps with minor changes. It
would be nice if I could get some comments on it from someone other
than me or Daniel, but if nobody else has anything to say, I will just
accept
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
I've personally not been convinced of this Value/Parser/Formatter pattern
but if I'm the only one I'll just keep my big mouth shut
I agree with this as well. The idea behind this RFC is the hair can't cut
itself pattern.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
I've personally not been convinced of this Value/Parser/Formatter pattern
but if I'm the only one I'll just keep my big mouth shut
I agree with
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
I would assume something like the prefixed text form. As long
as the TitleValue knows its namespace and title you can guess
the rest.
Maybe, but the RFC says, As a value object, this has no knowledge about
namespaces,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
I would assume something like the prefixed text form. As long
as the TitleValue knows its namespace and title you can guess
the rest.
Maybe,
On 2013-10-23 9:39 PM, Chad wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
I would assume something like the prefixed text form. As long
as the TitleValue knows its namespace and title you
12 matches
Mail list logo
