Hi I am Natesh Relhan . I am a B-Tech student in JIIT Noida . I plan to
propose a idea which implements a gallery part in Wikimedia Commons Android
app and have further categorizations based on contents .
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:NateshR/Gsoc_Proposal_2014
Hi I am Natesh Relhan . I am a B-Tech student in JIIT Noida . I plan to
propose a idea which implements a gallery part in Wikimedia Commons Android
app and have further categorizations based on contents .
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:NateshR/Gsoc_Proposal_2014
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 05:04:38AM +0400, Max Semenik wrote:
And finally, appreciation: this was made possible only thanks to awesome
help from our search team, Nik Everett and Chad Horohoe. You kick ass
guys!
Extending appreciation: thanks Max, good work! This is great :)
Faidon
Or rather, a couple users did it (it's very simple with
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Pywikibot/touch.py and any user
account) and they were severely admonished for a reason or another.
Nemo
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:19:59AM -0700, Chad wrote:
No. I've thought the OpenStack policy is rude to contributors.
Me too.
I'd also prefer we do not automatically abandon changes.
Best regards,
Christian
--
quelltextlich e.U. \\ Christian Aistleitner
Le 10/04/2014 03:08, Brian Wolff a écrit :
Of course this thread isnt supposed to be about if its a good idea to
increase the size, so far everyone is agreement on that front. The issue is
whether doing so would kill swift due to a large increase in object count
(or some other performance
On 04/09/2014 05:43 PM, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
On 04/07/2014 10:29 PM, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_meetings/RFC_review_2014-04-09
This Wednesday, I'd like to get some quick is this RfC still
valid/what's the next step? checks on a few of our
Dear list members,
I am pleased to announce the release of WP-MIRROR 0.7.
0) SUMMARY
The main design objective was this: RENDERING.
A page rendered by the mirror is now very similar to the same page
rendered by the WMF server. Indeed, not only do pages look almost the
same, they now *behave*
Please don't do this for operations/puppet. We've had patches sitting there
for way longer than this that still got improved and merged eventually.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:26 AM, Christian Aistleitner
christ...@quelltextlich.at wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:19:59AM -0700, Chad
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 21:45:05 +0200, James Forrester
jforres...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Proposal:
- Make the default a nice proper size for the modern Web; I suggest
360px but could be argued up.
- Remove
I echo Brian's assessment here. Screen readers don't care about fonts.
They only look at what the semantic elements tell you.
DJ
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
And has any testing been done with screen readers and dyslexia readers to
I would be
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Faidon Liambotis fai...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 05:04:38AM +0400, Max Semenik wrote:
And finally, appreciation: this was made possible only thanks to awesome
help from our search team, Nik Everett and Chad Horohoe. You kick ass
guys!
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Sumana Harihareswara suma...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Aaron Schulz mentioned that someone should consult him and anomie
regarding how to fix the externallinks issue; Aaron, you wanna expand on
that? It sounded like it wasn't related particularly to any of the
My sentiment here is that all of this has supported every latent
opinion that I had about the project when it was started. Years of
maintaining templates, CSS and Javascript on English Wikipedia had
taught me not to mess with fonts unless it was very targeted
(preferring a specific font for a
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Derk-Jan Hartman
d.j.hartman+wmf...@gmail.com wrote:
So for me, the question is not how can we apply pretty serif fonts to
headers, the question is what can we do short term and long term to
make that happen.
It would be good if we could focus the conversation
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
(snip)
My understanding is that there are three separate major issues:
* serif may not be a good choice for certain languages
* The explicitly specified sans-serif stack needs to be further
optimized
* some people
Hey,
I just had Certificate Patrol in Firefox let me know that the SSL cert for
Wikimedia.org was changed? Does anyone know anything about that? Are multiple
certificates in use?
Old cert:
- Builtin Object Token:Equifax Secure CA
- *.wikimedia.org
SHA1:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Derric Atzrott
datzr...@alizeepathology.com wrote:
I just had Certificate Patrol in Firefox let me know that the SSL cert for
Wikimedia.org was changed? Does anyone know anything about that? Are
multiple
certificates in use?
Probably due to the Heartbleed
Il 10/04/2014 21:32, Tyler Romeo ha scritto:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Derric Atzrott
datzr...@alizeepathology.com wrote:
I just had Certificate Patrol in Firefox let me know that the SSL cert for
Wikimedia.org was changed? Does anyone know anything about that? Are
multiple
the ssl certs were all replaced via Greg:
FYI to this audience as well:
We're reseting all user session tokens today due to heartbleed.
What I didn't state below is that we have already replaced our SSL certs
as well as upgraded to the fixed version of openssl.
- Forwarded message from
Il 10/04/2014 21:37, David Chamberlain ha scritto:
the ssl certs were all replaced via Greg:
FYI to this audience as well:
We're reseting all user session tokens today due to heartbleed.
What I didn't state below is that we have already replaced our SSL certs
as well as upgraded to the fixed
On Apr 10, 2014 3:34 PM, Vito vituzzu.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep, it would make a few sense to reset tokens and change passwords
before certs are reissued.
No it doesn't!!!
Change keys/certs first. Then do tokens/passwords.
-Jeremy
___
Wikitech-l
On Apr 10, 2014 3:27 PM, Derric Atzrott datzr...@alizeepathology.com
wrote:
I just had Certificate Patrol in Firefox let me know that the SSL cert for
Wikimedia.org was changed? Does anyone know anything about that? Are
multiple
certificates in use?
FYI, this has been widely covered in a lot
Greetings!
I am happy to let you know that we have just launched Media Viewer 0.2 on our
first pilot site, MediaWiki.org, where it is now enabled by default for all
users (previously, it was only available as a Beta Feature).
Media Viewer aims to improve the multimedia viewing experience on
I just had Certificate Patrol in Firefox let me know that the SSL cert for
Wikimedia.org was changed? Does anyone know anything about that? Are
multiple
certificates in use?
FYI, this has been widely covered in a lot of mainstream press. (but not
necessarily well. Some call OpenSSL a
I emailed mobile-l about this, now I'm moving this discussion to
wikitech-l. Rather than repeat myself, here's the thread to read:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/mobile-l/2014-April/006884.html
Your feedback is welcome here on wikitech-l. Next week we'd like to move
the discussion to the
On 11 April 2014 05:53, Adam Baso ab...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Your feedback is welcome here on wikitech-l. Next week we'd like to move
the discussion to the wikimediaannounce-l mailing list, but we wanted to
first cover it on this main developer list.
Announce-l isn't a discussion list, it
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
(snip)
My understanding is that there are three separate major issues:
* serif may not be a good choice for certain languages
* The explicitly
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.comwrote:
Given that you do have statistics, how did all the huha around the ULS
performance issue and now all this hit the use of the functionality for
dyslexic people?
I'm not sure what statistics you're referring to.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Derric Atzrott
datzr...@alizeepathology.com wrote:
I just had Certificate Patrol in Firefox let me know that the SSL cert for
Wikimedia.org was changed? Does anyone know anything about that? Are
multiple
certificates in use?
FYI, this has been widely covered
On 9 April 2014 16:45, Arthur Richards aricha...@wikimedia.org wrote:
The mobile web team has been trying to get
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/116037/ merged for quite some time now.
Particularly since this is a core change, mobile web folks are hesitant to
merge it ourselves. Can
w00t! thanks Timo and everyone else :D
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:39 PM, James Forrester
jforres...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
On 9 April 2014 16:45, Arthur Richards aricha...@wikimedia.org wrote:
The mobile web team has been trying to get
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/116037/ merged for
On Thursday, April 10, 2014, Steven Walling steven.wall...@gmail.com
wrote:
I definitely agree with Erik's summation, but I would not like to open up
discussion about Wikimedia-specific consideration vs. core, which is a
broader question about what Vector should be/do that I don't think
On 10 April 2014 22:16, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Our 3rd party MediaWiki users (the sysadmins and their users) should not be
affected by the unstable situation around font styles. If we are going to
change their defaults, we should better do it when we are certain about the
Thanks for catching that! For the follow-up non-technical community we'll
plan to email wikimedia-l (broader discussion) instead of
wikimediannounce-l (low volume non-technical).
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:14 PM, K. Peachey p858sn...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 April 2014 05:53, Adam Baso
On 4/10/14, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Derk-Jan Hartman
d.j.hartman+wmf...@gmail.com wrote:
So for me, the question is not how can we apply pretty serif fonts to
headers, the question is what can we do short term and long term to
make that happen.
Erik Moeller wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Derk-Jan Hartman
d.j.hartman+wmf...@gmail.com wrote:
So for me, the question is not how can we apply pretty serif fonts to
headers, the question is what can we do short term and long term to
make that happen.
It would be good if we could
On Thursday, April 10, 2014, MZMcBride
z...@mzmcbride.comjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','z...@mzmcbride.com');
wrote:
Erik Moeller wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Derk-Jan Hartman
d.j.hartman+wmf...@gmail.com wrote:
So for me, the question is not how can we apply pretty serif fonts to
On Thursday, April 10, 2014, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Erik Moeller wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Derk-Jan Hartman
d.j.hartman+wmf...@gmail.com wrote:
So for me, the question is not how can we apply pretty serif fonts to
headers, the question is what can we do short
On Thursday, April 10, 2014, Steven Walling steven.wall...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thursday, April 10, 2014, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Erik Moeller wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Derk-Jan Hartman
d.j.hartman+wmf...@gmail.com wrote:
So for me, the question is not how can we
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
..
By lower quality I mean both subjectively, but also objectively. For
example, today I was reading
https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Hamilton_wins_%27incredible%27_Bahrain_race,_F1%27s_900th_Grand_Prix
(enwikinews is one of the
41 matches
Mail list logo
