[Wikitech-l] Weigh in on whether to finalize "Conflict of interest" sections of Code of Conduct

2016-11-23 Thread Matthew Flaschen
Please comment on whether to approve the "Conflict of interest" section of the draft Code of conduct for technical spaces. This section did not reach not reach consensus earlier, but changes were made seeking to address the previous concerns. You can find the section at

[Wikitech-l] Making bot rights not mark edits to mediawiki namespace as being bot

2016-11-23 Thread Brian Wolff
Hi all, I would like to propose that we separate the bot right into bot and boteditinterface, where the bot right only allows you to mark edits as bot edits for non-mediawiki namespace edits and you would need the boteditinterface right to mark any mediawiki namespace edits as a bot edit.

[Wikitech-l] CI: New unit tests for skins (mw)

2016-11-23 Thread Paladox
Hi, hashar today managed to get unit tests to work for mw skins. See task https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T68926 Also see https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/323161/ But he has identified some repo's fail the test, please see https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T113860 Please could we have help

[Wikitech-l] Triaging Summit proposals for "How to grow our technical community"

2016-11-23 Thread Quim Gil
The Wikimedia developer Summit main topic "How to grow our technical community " has nine proposals aiming to be accepted as pre-scheduled sessions. Mathematically speaking, it is very unlikely that

[Wikitech-l] 2016-11-23 Scrum of Scrums meeting notes

2016-11-23 Thread Grace Gellerman
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Scrum_of_scrums/2016-11-23 = 2016-11-23 = == Technology == === Analytics === * Blockers: none * on track for quaterly goals * main project about edit data (mediawiki edit history reconstruction) progressing, * we are now calculating standard edit metrics for all

Re: [Wikitech-l] About the frontend development tools we use

2016-11-23 Thread Bartosz Dziewoński
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Niklas Laxström wrote: > I was reading http://stateofjs.com/2016/introduction/#sections and > could not avoid noticing that the frameworks or technologies we use > are not among the most popular or most liked among the participants of >