On 20 December 2012 05:15, Waldir Pimenta wal...@email.com wrote:
Hi all,
Since the Concise Wikipedia proposal[1] has been mentioned in the last two
Signpost editions[2][3] (and after being nudged by Sumana), I figured I'd
drop a note here in case anyone will be interested in trying out a
2012/11/28 Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org:
WMF is not going to organize this, but we can help sponsor travel and
bring the key developers from our side who will work on this. Are
there any takers for supporting a 20-30 people development event in
Europe focused on mapping/geodata? I'm
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 13:30 -0500, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
Try these tips:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Git/Code_review/Getting_reviews
Does Gerrit support setting default CCs for certain code areas
(projects, subfolders etc)?
Letting new contributors search manually for a patch reviewer
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 13:30 -0500, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
Try these tips:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Git/Code_review/Getting_reviews
Does Gerrit support setting default CCs for certain code areas
(projects,
On 20 December 2012 13:35, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Does Gerrit support setting default CCs for certain code areas
(projects, subfolders etc)?
Letting new contributors search manually for a patch reviewer feels as
wrong as letting new bug reporters search for an assignee or
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:20:07 +0100, Merlijn van Deen valhall...@arctus.nl
wrote:
It's possible to do it the other way around - people can /subscribe/ to a
project via https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/settings/projects and receive
e-mails when new patchsets are uploaded. I don't think this adds
On 18.12.2012 16:51, Yury Katkov wrote:
Of course I mean WebRequest class.
-
Yury Katkov, WikiVote
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Yury Katkov katkov.ju...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys!
I'm writing the EditPage::showEditForm:fields and I want to get a
Request object. The use of wgRequest
Nice, thank you!
-
Yury Katkov, WikiVote
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Niklas Laxström
niklas.laxst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Yury Katkov katkov.ju...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys!
I'm writing the EditPage::showEditForm:fields and I want to get a
Request
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 19:03 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
I'm proposing adding a new status like
PATCH_TO_REVIEW or
or something like this (bikeshed, yay!). Probably the first.
The status would replace the patch-in-gerrit keyword
Thanks for the opinions and comments so far.
I don't plan to
On 11/12/12 19:56, Andre Klapper wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 19:30 +0100, Krinkle wrote:
The proposal Andre makes here sounds confusing, How is that different
from the current situation? What problem is it supposed to address?
Re-reading what the hack is supposed to do I realize that making
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Mark Holmquist mtrac...@member.fsf.orgwrote:
Is there any reason why this shouldn't be a stated policy? If not,
where should we state the policy so that people are aware of it?
Considering that testwiki has a nice documentation page [0] and
test2wiki
On 12/19/2012 10:11 PM, Chris Steipp wrote:
I'll have both a google hangout for video, and an audio line for
anyone who prefers to avoid closed technology. If you want to dial in,
please let me know so I can get you a phone number in advance.
I'd like to join this.
Thanks,
Matt Flaschen
On 12/20/2012 04:15 PM, Chris McMahon wrote:
Considering that testwiki has a nice documentation page [0] and
test2wiki doesn't [1], I think we should probably clear that up before
announcing any policy.
[0] http://wikitech.wikimedia.org/view/Test.wikipedia.org
[1]
On 12/19/2012 05:57 AM, vita...@yourcmc.ru wrote:
Hello!
28 SEPTEMBER I've pushed minor changes to the gerrit, to the Drafts
extensions.
Since then I've corrected two of them (uploaded patch set 2), but
after that, nobody did the review. As I understand, Gerrit will abandon
changes after a
This is great Chris. Airport wifi permitted, I will gladly tune in.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Chris Steipp cste...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I'd like to invite anyone interested to join in on a secure coding
documentation sprint on Friday of this week (Dec 21st), from
Security concerns when running tests with arbitrary code (from anyone since
labsconsole account registration opened...) from what I understand.
I have requested that I am added to the whitelist
here:https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/39712/2
Hoo also did
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Krenair kren...@gmail.com wrote:
Security concerns when running tests with arbitrary code (from anyone since
labsconsole account registration opened...) from what I understand.
I have requested that I am added to the whitelist
On 12/20/2012 07:50 PM, bawolff wrote:
Seems kind of odd to only run unit tests for code from experienced
people. While everyone benefits from the unit tests, I imagine
inexperienced new developers would benefit the most (One assumes
people with @wikimedia.org emails ought to be experienced ;)
On 12/19/2012 06:43 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
It's not completely sorted out but there has been a big progress in just
a couple of days:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Social_media
Summary: follow like MediaWiki in your social networks to read
promote MediaWiki Wikimedia tech news.
*
I might join in. I'm guessing the Hangout link will be sent via the mailing
list?
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Rob Moen rm...@wikimedia.org wrote:
This
20 matches
Mail list logo
