Hi,
I was following this
tutorialhttps://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Writing_an_extension_for_deploymentfor
deploying an extension on MediaWiki. It asked me to create a
labs/git/gerrit account.
When I opened the
linkhttps://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UserLogin/signup,
I entered the following
The numbers are important. And perhaps what isn't being reflected well
here is the genuine disappointment felt by so many in the enwiki community;
there was more excitement about this project than probably any other that
WMF has undertaken in the past 5 years. The sudden leap from
I was glad to see some WMF members speak their mind against the current
stance from Erik and James.
But when I see Erik answer, I'm clearly understanding that WMF management
is simply being blind.
Erik, if I read correctly your reply :
- You still don't have analysed the A/B test period :
Thanks Risker,
I think you've summarized the position of many experienced users.
100% agreed.
Nico
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
The numbers are important. And perhaps what isn't being reflected well
here is the genuine disappointment felt by so many in
On 07/22/2013 10:44 PM, Tim Starling wrote:
Round-trip bugs, and bugs which cause a given wikitext input to give
different HTML in Parsoid compared to MW, should have been detected
during automated testing, prior to beta deployment. I don't know why
we need users to report them.
500+ edits are
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 6:35 PM, James Forrester
jforres...@wikimedia.org wrote:
It would imply that Wikimedia thinks preference bloat is an appropriate way
forward for expenditure of donor funds. This would be a lie. Each added
preference adds to the complexity of our software - so increasing
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:13 PM, anubhav agarwal anubhav...@gmail.comwrote:
I was following this
tutorial
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Writing_an_extension_for_deploymentfor
deploying an extension on MediaWiki. It asked me to create a
labs/git/gerrit account.
When I opened the
Erik, please stop and listen. Almost without exception, people from all
areas of the Wikimedia community are calling on a re-evaluation here. It's
lovely to have this vision of the Mediawiki future. But until you get
VisualEditor right, you need to get your feet back on the ground. People
were
On 23/07/13 15:23, Erik Moeller wrote:
Editing this page in Firefox on a 6-year-old system only slightly
faster than the tester's specs today takes about 5 seconds to
initialize. In Chrome it takes about 3 seconds, in the ballpark of
reloading the page into the source editor. Note that Gabriel
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013, Subramanya Sastry wrote:
500+ edits are being done per hour using Visual Editor
500+ people are making edits with the default editor, I'm pretty sure
(without doing stats on it) that a lot of them wouldn't be experienced
enough to kill it off
--
-- Sent from
If you want to export the data from one instance of MW and import it
to another instance of MW then XML Dumps will do very well.
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Importing_XML_dumps
-
Yury Katkov, WikiVote
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Ryan Rick Acta rie...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
Do
On 23 July 2013 02:32, Subramanya Sastry ssas...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 07/22/2013 10:44 PM, Tim Starling wrote:
Round-trip bugs, and bugs which cause a given wikitext input to give
different HTML in Parsoid compared to MW, should have been detected
during automated testing, prior to beta
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I tried editing [[Argentina]] on my laptop just now, it took 45
seconds of CPU time and 51 seconds of wall clock time before the
percentage CPU usage began to drop. It's pretty slow.
Yes, that's why I said
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
You pretty much had one chance at A/B testing, and it's done now. You
can't repeat the tests as long as VE is the default editor.
That's not correct at all. It's still entirely possible to deliver
different editing
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Steve Summit s...@eskimo.com wrote:
Here's a thought experiment: if visual editing had existed (with
reasonable functionality) since day 1, would there ever have been
a way to disable it, let alone a hue and cry over a lack of a way
to disable it?
This isn't
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Subramanya Sastry
ssas...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 07/22/2013 10:44 PM, Tim Starling wrote:
Round-trip bugs, and bugs which cause a given wikitext input to give
different HTML in Parsoid compared to MW, should have been detected
during automated testing, prior
I'm wondering if the lack of reactions so far is positive or negative.
It's negative, it shows that few people have the confidence to think they
have something worthwhile to contribute on this niche area. :(
Output:
I'd love to support MathML as primary direction, but I still see huge
problems
Hello,
Here is what I would like to do : generating reports which give, for a
given language, a list of words which are used on the web with a number
evaluating its occurencies, but which are not in a given wiktionary.
How would you recommand to implemente that within the wikimedia
Once you have a list of words which are used on the web (this must be got
from an outer source, nothing to do it within Wiktionary), the easiest way
is to run a bot, e.g. Pywikipedia.
2013/7/23 Mathieu Stumpf psychosl...@culture-libre.org
Hello,
Here is what I would like to do : generating
http://storage.googleapis.com/books/ngrams/books/datasetsv2.html
2013/7/23 Bináris wikipo...@gmail.com
Once you have a list of words which are used on the web (this must be got
from an outer source, nothing to do it within Wiktionary), the easiest way
is to run a bot, e.g. Pywikipedia.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:35 AM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On the first point, right now, we're approaching categories and
similar page metadata from the point of view of the editing surface as
an entrypoint. This makes sense if you simply try to map all aspects
of markup (which
2013/7/23 MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com
What we need is for you and Erik to recognize that you're wrong and to
make this right. Is there anyone besides you and Erik who agree with the
position you're taking here?
They are not alone. I also agree with their position, and I sincerely hope
we
GSoC mentors: read this email through and submit your mid-term
evaluation between 29 July - 2 August in Google Melange. One per project
is enough. If the primary mentor can't make it then the secondary mentor
needs to step in.
VERY IMPORTANT
Missing this deadline means the cancellation of
snip
Since the devs implemented resource loader it has become
harder and harder to block the poorly developed bloat that has crept into
mediawiki. I used to be able to isolate the JavaScript file causing the
issues (I remember BITS geolocation being a major hog) and just block it.
Now thats not
However, from a user's standpoint, it still doesn't make a ton of
sense to do it that way. If I just want to add a category, I shouldn't
have to invoke an editing surface at all. Similarly, if I want to turn
a page into a redirect, I shouldn't have to edit the page at all. As
most of you
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Derk-Jan Hartman
d.j.hartman+wmf...@gmail.com wrote:
So what I would actually propose for the short term (next few years) in
case we really want to go the direction of MathML is the following:
1: img tag + --data-math=formulaID in HTML
2: script to detect
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Bináris wikipo...@gmail.com wrote:
Once you have a list of words which are used on the web (this must be got
from an outer source, nothing to do it within Wiktionary), the easiest way
is to run a bot, e.g. Pywikipedia.
Rather than writing a bot, you might
On 23.07.2013, 19:30 C. wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Derk-Jan Hartman
d.j.hartman+wmf...@gmail.com wrote:
So what I would actually propose for the short term (next few years) in
case we really want to go the direction of MathML is the following:
1: img tag +
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
PS: fwiw I'm starting a week of holidays tomorrow and then I will be flying
to Hong Kong for Wikimania on Aug 1-2. If you need and org admin Lydia
Pintscher will be able to help you.
As Quim said I am available to answer any
Hi John and Risker,
First off, I do want to once again clarify that my intention in the
previous post was not to claim that VE/Parsoid is perfect. It was more
that we've fixed sufficient bugs at this point that the most significant
bugs (bugs, not missing features) that need fixing (and are
Hello,
Here is what I would like to do : generating reports which give, for a
given language, a list of words which are used on the web with a number
evaluating its occurencies, but which are not in a given wiktionary.
How would you recommand to implemente that within the wikimedia
If you both will be traveling, who will do the work of the org adm.
Eg. on IRC
2013/7/23 Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
PS: fwiw I'm starting a week of holidays tomorrow and then I will be
flying
to Hong
?
2013/7/23 Raylton P. Sousa raylton.so...@gmail.com
If you both will be traveling, who will do the work of the org adm.
Eg. on IRC
2013/7/23 Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
PS: fwiw I'm starting a week of
On 23 jul. 2013, at 18:06, Subramanya Sastry ssas...@wikimedia.org wrote:
A leading line feed in a parameter - what the?
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Sam_%26_Cat_episodescurid=39469556diff=565437324oldid=565416618
This is something I'll have to investigate.
This is
You may be interested in this.
Cristian
-- Forwarded message --
From: Karthik Nadar karthik...@wikimedia.in
Date: 2013/7/23
Subject: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Job Offer: Technical Position for WLM 2013
To: Wiki Loves Monuments Photograph Competition
On a side note, I find it interesting how none of the actual VE and Parsoid
developers replied here, apart from Roan, Chris and Subbu on off-topic
technical issues (thanks for that).
--
Matma Rex
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.orgwrote:
Do you have any recommendations for how we should handle deprecations?
Is this done on a case-by-case basis?
Most of the deprecated hooks have ContentHandler-aware replacements with
compatible signatures. The
Afternoon,
Anyone else having issues getting at Gitblit? I've not been able to get at it
for the past half hour or so.
Thank you,
Derric Atzrott
Computer Specialist
Alizee Pathology
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Just confirming that nothing is required for OPW and that this is only for
GSoC
-Chris
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
GSoC mentors: read this email through and submit your mid-term evaluation
between 29 July - 2 August in Google Melange. One per project is
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Ori Livneh o...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Daniel was diligent about adding wfDeprecated calls to the deprecated
methods that the older hooks calls. I wonder if we could add a Jenkins
check that flags usage of deprecated features. A sophisticated version
would
In the interest of gathering slightly larger statistics, I manually
reviewed 200 VE entries on recent changes.
I am classifying these as
* Good edit
* Test edits / newbie errors likely to happen in either editor (not VE's fault)
* Obvious vandal edit (not VE's fault)
* Damaged source that
Why do you think those nowiki tags were added by the editors?
Risker
On 23 July 2013 15:32, Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com wrote:
In the interest of gathering slightly larger statistics, I manually
reviewed 200 VE entries on recent changes.
I am classifying these as
* Good edit
* Test
It's been flakey the past few days. I've been trying to get to the
bottom of it.
-Chad
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Derric Atzrott
datzr...@alizeepathology.com wrote:
Afternoon,
Anyone else having issues getting at Gitblit? I've not been able to get
at it
for the past half hour or
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Derric Atzrott
datzr...@alizeepathology.com wrote:
snip
Since the devs implemented resource loader it has become
harder and harder to block the poorly developed bloat that has crept into
mediawiki. I used to be able to isolate the JavaScript file causing the
Risker wrote:
On 23 July 2013 15:32, Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com wrote:
* Corrupted page content that appears to be caused by the unfamiliar
UI (e.g. nowiki[[Foo]]/nowiki)
Why do you think those nowiki tags were added by the editors?
I assume that since it's VE's job to be wysiwyg, and to
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Daniel Barrett d...@vistaprint.com wrote:
Risker asks:
Why do you think those nowiki tags were added by the editors?
I can't speak for the original poster, but the last time I used VE,
it added unwanted nowiki tags by itself.
You can see an example in my most
Whoops, didn't realize this thread had been forked off while I was out
to lunch, and so I responded to the other thread. Sorry about that :(
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Steve Summit s...@eskimo.com wrote:
This is a likely enough mistake, and the number of times you
really want explicit
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Chris McMahon cmcma...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Just confirming that nothing is required for OPW and that this is only for
GSoC
Correct. This formal evaluation is for GSoC.
Cheers
Lydia
--
Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher
Community Communications
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Raylton P. Sousa
raylton.so...@gmail.com wrote:
If you both will be traveling, who will do the work of the org adm.
Eg. on IRC
Me. I am available on IRC until Monday. I would assume you are all old
enough to come to me with pressing questions until then :) And
Le 23/07/13 21:12, Bartosz Dziewoński a écrit :
On a side note, I find it interesting how none of the actual VE and
Parsoid developers replied here, apart from Roan, Chris and Subbu on
off-topic technical issues (thanks for that).
I am myself not replying because I don't want to be involved.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Steve Summit s...@eskimo.com wrote:
VE will (correctly, from its point of view) translate that to
nowiki[[pagename]]/nowiki in the page source.
This is a likely enough mistake, and the number of times you
really want explicit double square brackets is small
I am a Parsoid developer. I was participant #6 in the thread. As noted,
reponses #14 and #16 were also from VE developers, and our contributions
have continued. From my perspective the devs involved have done a pretty
good job of picking out technical content from the discussion and acting on
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Ori Livneh o...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I see now that setting $wgDevelopmentWarnings = true will manifest usage of
deprecated methods in PHP's error log, ...
I'll do my bit by enable this setting on MediaWiki-Vagrant :)
I did my bit by mentioning it in
@praveenp do you know if bug 48032 is fixable with texvc?
@Derk-Jan could you give some background on your MathJax is a nightmare
comment? Have their been specific reports or complaints? Or is this
something specific out of development (like the float issue)? It seems
MathJax is slower on
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Daniel Barrett d...@vistaprint.com
wrote:
Risker asks:
Of course those nowiki tags weren't added by the editors, VE doesn't
let you do that directly. What I think Robert was talking
Can we deprecate usage of '!ask' on IRC?
ori-l: !ask
wm-bot: Hi, how can we help you? Just ask your question.
It's annoying when people ask to ask, but the people who do so do it out of
insecurity or lack of experience, and so they're the last people we should
be siccing our bots on.
I've
Yeah I agree. Whenever I see it used I cringe a little bit thinking about
how the other person is reading it.
--Tyler Romeo
On Jul 23, 2013 5:51 PM, Ori Livneh o...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Can we deprecate usage of '!ask' on IRC?
ori-l: !ask
wm-bot: Hi, how can we help you? Just ask your
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:14 PM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
There is an enhancement for that.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51897
IMO the current behaviour isnt correct. There are so few instances
that nowiki is desirable, that the current VE should refuse to
[14:54] ^demon !ask del
[14:54] wm-bot Successfully removed ask
-Chad
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah I agree. Whenever I see it used I cringe a little bit thinking about
how the other person is reading it.
--Tyler Romeo
On Jul 23, 2013 5:51
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Subramanya Sastry
ssas...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi John and Risker,
First off, I do want to once again clarify that my intention in the previous
post was not to claim that VE/Parsoid is perfect. It was more that we've
fixed sufficient bugs at this point that
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:28 PM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Subramanya Sastry
ssas...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi John and Risker,
First off, I do want to once again clarify that my intention in the
previous
post was not to claim that
On 07/23/2013 05:28 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Subramanya Sastry
ssas...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi John and Risker,
First off, I do want to once again clarify that my intention in the previous
post was not to claim that VE/Parsoid is perfect. It was more that
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Subramanya Sastry
ssas...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 07/23/2013 05:28 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Subramanya Sastry
ssas...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi John and Risker,
First off, I do want to once again clarify that my intention in
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:13 PM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
http://parsoid.wmflabs.org:8001/stats
This is the url for our round trip testing on 160K pages (20K each from 8
wikipedias).
Fantastic! How frequently are those tests re-run? Could you add a
last-run-date on
On 07/23/2013 06:13 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Subramanya Sastry
ssas...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 07/23/2013 05:28 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Subramanya Sastry
ssas...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi John and Risker,
First off, I do
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:24 PM, C. Scott Ananian canan...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
Was a regression testsuite built using the issues encountered during
the last parser rewrite?
Yes, mediawiki/core/tests/parser/parserTests.txt (which predates parsoid)
has been continuously updated throughout
On 07/23/2013 06:02 PM, Subramanya Sastry wrote:
On 07/23/2013 05:28 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
VE and Parsoid devs have put in a lot and lot of effort to recognize
broken
wikitext source, fix it or isolate it,
My point was that you dont appear to be doing analysis of how of all
Wikipedia
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Subramanya Sastry
ssas...@wikimedia.org wrote:
http://parsoid.wmflabs.org:8001/stats
This is the url for our round trip testing on 160K pages (20K each from 8
wikipedias).
Very minor point .. there are ~400 missing pages on the list; is that
intentional ? ;-)
On 07/23/2013 06:55 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Subramanya Sastry
ssas...@wikimedia.org wrote:
http://parsoid.wmflabs.org:8001/stats
This is the url for our round trip testing on 160K pages (20K each from 8
wikipedias).
Very minor point .. there are ~400
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:55 PM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Subramanya Sastry
ssas...@wikimedia.org wrote:
http://parsoid.wmflabs.org:8001/stats
This is the url for our round trip testing on 160K pages (20K each from 8
wikipedias).
Very
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
We disagree on that one then. VisualEditor is meant to hide wikitext
entirely. The primary focus is on people that don't know wikitext. I
agree that we should keep nowiki-fication to a minimum and get rid of
the
On 07/23/2013 12:05 PM, Łukasz Garczewski wrote:
I'd appreciate if you could let me know when the code is available.
I branched this. Still have things to work on:
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/75142/
--
http://hexmode.com/
Love alone reveals the true shape of the universe.
--
Ori Livneh wrote:
Can we deprecate usage of '!ask' on IRC?
ori-l: !ask
wm-bot: Hi, how can we help you? Just ask your question.
It's annoying when people ask to ask, but the people who do so do it out
of insecurity or lack of experience, and so they're the last people we
should be siccing our
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab
IdeaLab is an incubator for people to share ideas to improve Wikimedia
projects and collaboratively develop them into plans and grant
proposals.
I'm cross-posting to the developer and researcher lists because I
could imagine some of you following
On 22 July 2013 18:35, James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 22 July 2013 11:45, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
Putting all of the issues aside, I'd like to know what the reason is for
hiding the preference. Let's assume for a second that VE does not hinder
users at
Thank you for changing your mind.
I might have missed something, but is there any schedule for when
VisualEditor will be considered 'out of beta'? Or is it simply a case of
the VE team deciding that it's stable enough?
Alex Monk
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:55 AM, James Forrester
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:55 PM, James Forrester
jforres...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
I hope that as few users as possible will
choose this way to degrade their experience and deprive the community of
their input. Instead of endlessly arguing the point about this, I'd rather
my team and I spending
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Alex Monk kren...@gmail.com wrote:
I might have missed something, but is there any schedule for when
VisualEditor will be considered 'out of beta'?
Not so soon that we couldn't afford to let this thread die down for a bit.
I personally know for a fact nobody is trying to trick the user in this case.
We are simply trying to make editing easier for new editors without confusing
them. As a membwr f the visual editor team, I'm supportive of our advanced and
seemingly more important editors opt-out during the beta.
My apologies for the ham handed email. I'm supportive of the opt out feature
while ve is in beta. Going forward I agree with the notion that experienced
editors know what editor they want to use before the page completely loads. I
like the idea of a preference to select a default editor.
—
Hello,
It seems that the page view statistics data does not contain the
actual data for the last few hours.
http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-raw/2013/2013-07/
Are there any failures on the server-side?
Thanks,
Ikuya
___
Wikitech-l mailing
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 15:28 -0400, Derric Atzrott wrote:
Anyone else having issues getting at Gitblit? I've not been able to get at it
for the past half hour or so.
It's intermittent but happens quite often for the last days:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51769
andre
--
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
I know that this crafty UI was introduced to encourage users to use
the new editor. The trouble is, this assumes that users have no idea
which editor they want to use, and thus will happily use whatever
editor the JS
On Jul 24, 2013 12:43 AM, Ikuya Yamada ik...@sfc.keio.ac.jp wrote:
It seems that the page view statistics data does not contain the
actual data for the last few hours.
http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-raw/2013/2013-07/
Are there any failures on the server-side?
Just looking at
I wrote:
I think users should be encouraged to use VE by making VE really
awesome, and by promoting its awesomeness, rather than by trying to
trick them into using it.
To clarify: I didn't mean to imply that the VE team were trying to
trick users. They are not. I just mean that if you consider
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 15:28 -0400, Derric Atzrott wrote:
Anyone else having issues getting at Gitblit? I've not been able to get
at it
for the past half hour or so.
It's intermittent but happens quite often for
86 matches
Mail list logo
