Re: [Wikitech-l] Fwd: [wikimedia #5841] etherpad.wikimedia.org downtime due to upgrade

2013-09-30 Thread Alexandros Kosiaris
Hello Federico,

Some (but not all) of the etherpad links you provided do not have any
content. There are two ways to proceed.

If they are new enough (after 2013-08-19) it might be a bug in
etherpad-lite. In that case we should wait for the upgrade, try to
reproduce and fill a bug report to the authors of the software. I am
afraid the content of the pad is probably lost.

If they are old enough (before 2013-08-19), there probably was a
problem with the migration from the old etherpad to the new one. The
scripts provided by the authors to do the migration were buggy enough
to justify such a problem. We did have to copy some pads manually,
however the ones you list were not among them. In that case it is
still possible to recover the content of the pad from the old etherpad
installation (we have kept it around). All you need to do is access it
via http://etherpad-old.wikimedia.org instead of
http://etherpad.wikimedia.org


On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
 What should I do if a number of etherpads seem to be completely gone?
 Can someone click on any of the pad links on
 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2013/Schedule/Saturday
 and tell me if they are able to see some content? Thanks.

 Nemo


 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l



-- 
Alexandros Kosiaris akosia...@wikimedia.org

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

[Wikitech-l] Fwd: [wikimedia #5841] etherpad.wikimedia.org downtime due to upgrade

2013-09-30 Thread Alexandros Kosiaris
FYI,


-- Forwarded message --
From:  core-...@rt.wikimedia.org
Date: Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 2:12 PM
Subject: Fwd: [wikimedia #5841] etherpad.wikimedia.org downtime due to upgrade

etherpad-lite has been successfully update to version 1.2.11. The
upgrade procedure server-wise was uneventfull, however it will cause
some minor problems to existing users of the service. Specifically
CSS/JS elements of the page have changed and need to be re-downloaded
by the browser, however due to browser caching this does not happen
automatically. Users of the old version will have to FORCE REFRESH
their browser when accessing the service for the first time. Otherwise
they will get garbled versions of the user interface. Pad contents
will be intact, however a brief message suggesting the user does not
have permission to access a pad might show up. That message is
inaccurate and is a by-product of the garbled UI.


-- 
Alexandros Kosiaris akosia...@wikimedia.org

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

[Wikitech-l] Inline bug report history in Bugzilla

2013-09-30 Thread Andre Klapper
Hola,

if you have found yourself clicking the History link in Bugzilla
tickets way too often (to check who has set the Priority, or who has
changed the assignee and when), Bugzilla now has an opt-in to display
such metadata changes inline, between the comments of the bug report.

You can enable this by going to
  https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=settings 
and setting When viewing a bug, show all bug activity to On.

Cheers,
andre
-- 
Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/


___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Inline bug report history in Bugzilla

2013-09-30 Thread Petr Bena
wh


nice feature

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org wrote:
 Hola,

 if you have found yourself clicking the History link in Bugzilla
 tickets way too often (to check who has set the Priority, or who has
 changed the assignee and when), Bugzilla now has an opt-in to display
 such metadata changes inline, between the comments of the bug report.

 You can enable this by going to
   https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=settings
 and setting When viewing a bug, show all bug activity to On.

 Cheers,
 andre
 --
 Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler
 http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/


 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Inline bug report history in Bugzilla

2013-09-30 Thread James Forrester
Andre,

This is brilliant, and makes Bugzilla hugely more usable; could it be
switched on for all users by default, or would that impair the server
operation too much?

J.


On 30 September 2013 08:01, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 Hola,

 if you have found yourself clicking the History link in Bugzilla
 tickets way too often (to check who has set the Priority, or who has
 changed the assignee and when), Bugzilla now has an opt-in to display
 such metadata changes inline, between the comments of the bug report.

 You can enable this by going to
   https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=settings
 and setting When viewing a bug, show all bug activity to On.

 Cheers,
 andre
 --
 Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler
 http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/


 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l




-- 
James D. Forrester
Product Manager, VisualEditor
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.

jforres...@wikimedia.org | @jdforrester
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Fwd: [WikimediaMobile] webfonts in mobile frontend

2013-09-30 Thread Jon Robson
Thanks Amir for kicking this off!

A general point I wanted to make off the back of this... when adding
things to the mobile site, no matter how minimal a module is we should
get in the discipline habit of thinking Does everyone need this
module? We should be extremely careful what JavaScript and CSS
modules we add to mobile users, especially when modules are not useful
to certain users.

In this case I would recommend checking if the language needs WebFonts
before adding the module to the page. Another key thing we are doing
on mobile now is making use of mw.loader.using to conditionally load
JavaScript - this is another useful trick :-).



On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Yuvi Panda yuvipa...@gmail.com wrote:
 Forwarded to wikitech-l


 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il
 Date: Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:38 AM
 Subject: [WikimediaMobile] webfonts in mobile frontend
 To: mobil...@lists.wikimedia.org mobil...@lists.wikimedia.org


 Hi,

 So today I worked with Kaldari (thanks for the help!!) and committed a
 very simple module to enable webfonts support in MobileFrontend:
 https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/86340/
 https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/86337/

 Review and any comments are very welcome, of course.

 The current implementation is very simple. It doesn't allow any
 configuration or choice of fonts - if there is a default font for the
 language, it is used wherever there's a lang attribute or a style or a
 class the sets a font explicitly. (Some languages, like Tamil and
 Hebrew have fonts, but they are not default, so none are used). It may
 be worth optimizing it, for example:

 * Only loading the font of the content language to save time and
 bandwidth. (Loading additional fonts can be an option.)
 * Only loading fonts on devices that are known to have bad font
 support. On iPhone and it's pretty for many languages. On the latest
 Windows Mobile version it's very good. On Android below 4.0, however,
 it's very bad: most languages of India are completely unreadable,
 which is the main reason to do this (the same goes for languages of
 Ethiopia, South-East Asia and some others). Android 4 and above is not
 always perfect either.

 I'd love to hear more considerations about bandwidth, performance, testing 
 etc.

 Thanks!

 --
 Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
 http://aharoni.wordpress.com
 ‪“We're living in pieces,
 I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬

 ___
 Mobile-l mailing list
 mobil...@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l



 --
 Yuvi Panda T
 http://yuvi.in/blog

 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l



-- 
Jon Robson
http://jonrobson.me.uk
@rakugojon

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Improving anti-vandalism tools (twinkle, huggle etc) - suspicious edits queue

2013-09-30 Thread Jon Robson
I wonder if the refactor described in
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Support_for_user-specific_page_lists_in_core
could be adapted to help with this use case. I suspect it would be
highly useful to be able to create publicly viewable watchlists of
suspicious edits.

With a little bit of tweaking maybe when viewing the watchlist only
the suspicious edits would show in the list and users could
collectively 'unwatch' them when reviewed?


On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 I think you perfectly summarized this issue. I like the first solution
 (3rd provider on wikimedia labs with some well documented api
 interface) but I must admit that identity sharing might be little
 problem (if some troll figured out this system and we weren't using
 any identification at all, they could easily wipe all edits).

 Having this directly in MW as tags that can be applied by users would
 be probably best solution, but I am afraid it's going to take ages for
 this to happen

 On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Aaron Halfaker ahalfa...@wikimedia.org 
 wrote:
 I've got to say that this problem seems pretty straightforward.
  Essentially, we need something lighter than 'revert' for edits that need a
 second set of eyes.

 What we really want is a queue of suspect revisions that allows Wikipedians
 to flag new revisions, query current flagged revisions and remove revisions
 from the list after review.

 I see two clear options:

 *3rd party tool.  *A queue of suspect revisions can be created as a 3rd
 party tool (e.g. webapp + API running on labs).  Then gadgets and other 3rd
 party tools make use of the API to add, remove, update  query the set of
 flagged edits.   I worry about this option due to the lack of good identity
 sharing between Wikipedia and 3rd party wiki tools, but otherwise, it seems
 trivial to implement.

 *Make use of infrastructure in MediaWiki.  *We can either build on top of
 the features currently deployed or on top of new features in the pipeline.

 - Current MW: Someone brought up the example of adding a template to
 articles who have recent revisions needing review.  Such templates could
 appear on the talk page so as to not clutter the article.  I've got to
 admit that this sounds messy, but the user warning level system employed by
 Huggle, ClueBot NG, Twinkle, etc. is equally message.

 - New Features: If arbitrary tags could manually be added to revisions and
 queried from the MediaWiki (preferably, the API), the functionality of a
 third party tool described above could be captured without need for
 accessing an external tool.  This might require a little bit of gadget
 support for common actions taken on the suspicious edit queue.


 On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 8:59 AM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
  Not really, I can't see how tags help at all in here. We are talking
  about any kind of edit (nothing that can be matched by regex) which
  seems suspicious to vandal-fighter (human) but who can't make sure if
  it's vandalism or not. Nothing like abuse filter nor patrolled edits
  can help here (unless we mark every single edit as patrolled and these
  people who see such a suspicious edit would mark it as un-patrolled or
  something like that)

 If I understand correctly, you want user-applied tags on revisions,
 which is bug 1189.

 https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189

 All edits start out unpatrolled.

 If your interface shows the union of unpatrolled edits and a
 huggle-user-selected-tag (be it tor, abusefilter, or manually added
 tag) ..

 'Experts' edit the page if required, and then mark the revision as
 patrolled so it no longer appears in the queue.

 --
 John Vandenberg

 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l



-- 
Jon Robson
http://jonrobson.me.uk
@rakugojon

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

[Wikitech-l] IRC office hour for Extension:BetaFeatures

2013-09-30 Thread Mark Holmquist
Hi all,

Due partly to the recent sparseness of traffic in #wikimedia-office, I've
scheduled an office hour [0] for the new BetaFeatures extension, which
the WMF is hoping to use for launching new features for beta testing.

This will primarily be a technical discussion focused on people who may
want to use the framework, or people who may want to help work on the
extension. Possible topics include:

* How do I use it?
* What features are under development in this framework right now?
* How does it work?
* Can I have feature X?

If you have any questions, or want to hear me wax on about what I've done
with the extension thus far, drop on by and have a chat. I'll be in 
#wikimedia-office on Thursday at 21:00 UTC (14:00 PDT).

[0] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/IRC_office_hours#Upcoming_office_hours

Happy hacking,

-- 
Mark Holmquist
Software Engineer, Multimedia
Wikimedia Foundation
mtrac...@member.fsf.org
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/User:MHolmquist


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Conditional resource loading

2013-09-30 Thread Amelia Ireland
Tyler Romeo tylerromeo at gmail.com writes:
 On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Amelia Ireland
 amelia.ireland at gmod.orgwrote:
 
  I want to rewrite a couple of extensions to prevent them from loading
  resources unless the extension is active on a page. Is there some
  documentation on this somewhere, or an extension that does
  this whose code I can examine?
 
 
 This is probably what you're looking for:
 
 https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/ResourceLoader/Developing_
 with_ResourceLoader#Client-side_.28dynamically.29
 
 There's a JavaScript function mw.loader.using() that loads modules before
 calling the passed closure.

I've already used this method with one of the extensions. Is there anything
on the backend / PHP side so that I can advantage of ResourceLoader script
compression? It seems like it should be possible, but I don't have a 
thorough-enough knowledge of the innards of Mediawiki, and I can't find
anything in the docs on this topic.

Thanks,
Amelia.


___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Conditional resource loading

2013-09-30 Thread Mark Holmquist
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 09:27:29PM +, Amelia Ireland wrote:
 I've already used this method with one of the extensions. Is there anything
 on the backend / PHP side so that I can advantage of ResourceLoader script
 compression? It seems like it should be possible, but I don't have a 
 thorough-enough knowledge of the innards of Mediawiki, and I can't find
 anything in the docs on this topic.

As long as you know that the extension is enabled before the page loads
or the user takes any actions, you can simply find out where the modules
are added to the OutputPage (look/grep for addModules) and wrap it in
an appropriate if statement/block. I don't think ResourceLoader itself
has any nice methods to do this for you, but I also don't think it's a
particularly useful feature, given the ease with which developers can
do it themselves...

-- 
Mark Holmquist
Software Engineer, Multimedia
Wikimedia Foundation
mtrac...@member.fsf.org
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/User:MHolmquist


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] FOSDEM update

2013-09-30 Thread Emmanuel Engelhart
Le 25/09/2013 19:39, Quim Gil a écrit :
 Wikimedia wants to have a stand, and we have received an offer to help
 from the nascent Wikimedia Belgium chapter. Probably more help can be
 aggregated from CH, DE, FR, NL, UK + other tech contributors in the
 region? Let's do something really cool! To be discussed.

Kiwix and openZIM people never attend to the FOSDEM in the past. This is
something we seriously think to change next year with the help of
Wikimedia CH. If there is a Wikimedia booth, we would be really happy to
help to animate it.

Regards
Emmanuel



-- 
Kiwix - Wikipedia Offline  more
* Web: http://www.kiwix.org
* Twitter: https://twitter.com/KiwixOffline
* more: http://www.kiwix.org/wiki/Communication

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l