[Wikitech-l] Please help finish "Report a problem" section of CoC (+updates)

2015-10-21 Thread Matthew Flaschen 
We are now working on the "Report a problem" section of the draft Code 
of conduct:


* Section: 
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Code_of_Conduct/Draft#Report_a_problem


* Talk: 
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Code_of_Conduct/Draft#Finishing_the_.22Report_a_problem.22_section


* Alternatively, you can provide anonymous feedback to 
conduct-discuss...@wikimedia.org .


This is the best time to make any necessary changes to this section (and 
explain why, in edit summaries and/or talk) and discuss it on the talk page.


Your participation is also encouraged re the "Project administrators and 
maintainers have the right" line.  See 
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Code_of_Conduct/Draft#Rewording_proposal.


Other updates:

* The text of the intro, "Principles" and "Unacceptable behavior" 
sections has been frozen.  Thanks to everyone who helped discuss and 
edit these sections.  See 
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Code_of_Conduct/Draft#Fine_tuning_the_next_steps 
for details.


* The "Expected behavior" section has been moved, to 
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Expected_behavior (a guideline) and (for 
one sentence) to the "Report a problem" section.  See 
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Code_of_Conduct/Draft#Move_.22Expected_behavior.22_out_to_a_separate_guidelines_page.3F 
and 
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Code_of_Conduct/Draft#New_proposal.2C_welcomes_feedback_2


* The text at the end of the "Unacceptable behavior" section has been 
rewritten: 
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Code_of_Conduct/Draft#Move_.22Our_open_source_community_acknowledges22_out_of_the_CoC.3F 
.


Thanks,

Matt Flaschen

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] JetBrains IDE licenses for MW developers - php, js/node, python, C/C++, puppet, ruby, ...

2015-10-21 Thread Ricordisamoa 
How come the FOSS community hasn't managed to develop a suitable 
alternative yet?!?


Il 19/10/2015 22:02, Yuri Astrakhan ha scritto:

Developers, we now have licenses for JetBrains' IDEA Ultimate
 (JavaScript, PHP, Python, ...)  and CLion
 (C/C++).  The IDE supports debugging in
Vagrant and on-the-fly static code analysis.

If you are a volunteer developer, and want to use an IDE, contact me for a
license. Those with access to the office wiki may register directly at the
licenses  page.

Please try it for a bit before getting a license -- just in case you don't
like it.

P.S. This is only for those who want JetBrains' IDE. If you are happy with
Vim, good for you. If you like Atom or Sublime, great. If notepad is the
best text editor of all times, all the power to you.  Bikeshedding should
go into a separate thread ))
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l



___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] JetBrains IDE licenses for MW developers - php, js/node, python, C/C++, puppet, ruby, ...

2015-10-21 Thread Tyler Romeo 
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Ricordisamoa  wrote:

> How come the FOSS community hasn't managed to develop a suitable
> alternative yet?!?


If I had the time, I would definitely put together some sort of
.dir-locals.el for MediaWiki, that way we could make better use of Emacs,
since it has a bunch of IDE-like functionality, even if it's not IDEA-level
powerful.

*-- *
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2016
Major in Computer Science
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

[Wikitech-l] can't get git-review to work

2015-10-21 Thread Ryan Kaldari 
Recently I upgraded my Mac to OSX 10.10.5 and upgraded a lot of other stuff
in the process. But now I can't get git-review to work. Whenever I try to
run it, it gives the following stacktrace:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/bin/git-review", line 11, in 
sys.exit(main())
  File "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/git_review/cmd.py", line 1522, in
main
_main()
  File "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/git_review/cmd.py", line 1377, in
_main
(os.path.split(sys.argv[0])[-1], get_version()))
  File "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/git_review/cmd.py", line 209, in
get_version
provider = pkg_resources.get_provider(requirement)
  File
"/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.14-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
line 177, in get_provider
return working_set.find(moduleOrReq) or require(str(moduleOrReq))[0]
  File
"/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.14-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
line 654, in require
needed = self.resolve(parse_requirements(requirements))
  File
"/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.14-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
line 552, in resolve
raise DistributionNotFound(req)
pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: git-review

If I run "pip install --upgrade setuptools":
Requirement already up-to-date: setuptools in
/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages

If I run "pip install -U git-review":
Requirement already up-to-date: git-review in
/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages
Requirement already up-to-date: argparse in
/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages (from git-review)
Requirement already up-to-date: requests>=1.1 in
/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages (from git-review)

If I run "/usr/bin/easy_install --version":
distribute 0.6.14

I couldn't find any solution on Google or in our git-review docs. Any
suggestions?
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] can't get git-review to work

2015-10-21 Thread Alangi Derick 
In addition to what Brandon Harris said, i will also advice you to
join the #git channel and post this question to them. They might have
some inside into this problem and maybe help you without any worries.

Since you said you have not seen the solution on Google(because of the
type of OS you use), then i think #git is the best place to ask your
questions to since they are the specialist of git products and
commands.

On 10/21/15, Brandon Harris  wrote:
>
>   Try putting /usr/local/bin in your path before /usr/bin.  El Capitan
> rebuilt it's Python instance.d
>
>   Do this:
>
>   echo $PATH
>
>   And see what the order is.  Your path is set in your .bash_profile file:
>
>   export
> PATH=/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:$HOME/bin:/usr/local/mysql/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin
>
>   You may find, especially if you install lots of stuff via homebrew, that
> reinstalling them will also solve issues.
>
>
>
>> On Oct 21, 2015, at 1:47 PM, Ryan Kaldari  wrote:
>>
>> Recently I upgraded my Mac to OSX 10.10.5 and upgraded a lot of other
>> stuff
>> in the process. But now I can't get git-review to work. Whenever I try to
>> run it, it gives the following stacktrace:
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>  File "/usr/local/bin/git-review", line 11, in 
>>sys.exit(main())
>>  File "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/git_review/cmd.py", line 1522, in
>> main
>>_main()
>>  File "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/git_review/cmd.py", line 1377, in
>> _main
>>(os.path.split(sys.argv[0])[-1], get_version()))
>>  File "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/git_review/cmd.py", line 209, in
>> get_version
>>provider = pkg_resources.get_provider(requirement)
>>  File
>> "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.14-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
>> line 177, in get_provider
>>return working_set.find(moduleOrReq) or require(str(moduleOrReq))[0]
>>  File
>> "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.14-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
>> line 654, in require
>>needed = self.resolve(parse_requirements(requirements))
>>  File
>> "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.14-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
>> line 552, in resolve
>>raise DistributionNotFound(req)
>> pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: git-review
>>
>> If I run "pip install --upgrade setuptools":
>> Requirement already up-to-date: setuptools in
>> /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages
>>
>> If I run "pip install -U git-review":
>> Requirement already up-to-date: git-review in
>> /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages
>> Requirement already up-to-date: argparse in
>> /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages (from git-review)
>> Requirement already up-to-date: requests>=1.1 in
>> /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages (from git-review)
>>
>> If I run "/usr/bin/easy_install --version":
>> distribute 0.6.14
>>
>> I couldn't find any solution on Google or in our git-review docs. Any
>> suggestions?
>> ___
>> Wikitech-l mailing list
>> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
> ---
> Brandon Harris :: bhar...@gaijin.com :: made of steel wool and whiskey
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


-- 
Regards
Alangi Derick Ndimnain

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] can't get git-review to work

2015-10-21 Thread Brandon Harris 

Try putting /usr/local/bin in your path before /usr/bin.  El Capitan 
rebuilt it's Python instance.d

Do this: 

echo $PATH

And see what the order is.  Your path is set in your .bash_profile file:

export 
PATH=/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:$HOME/bin:/usr/local/mysql/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin

You may find, especially if you install lots of stuff via homebrew, 
that reinstalling them will also solve issues.



> On Oct 21, 2015, at 1:47 PM, Ryan Kaldari  wrote:
> 
> Recently I upgraded my Mac to OSX 10.10.5 and upgraded a lot of other stuff
> in the process. But now I can't get git-review to work. Whenever I try to
> run it, it gives the following stacktrace:
> 
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>  File "/usr/local/bin/git-review", line 11, in 
>sys.exit(main())
>  File "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/git_review/cmd.py", line 1522, in
> main
>_main()
>  File "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/git_review/cmd.py", line 1377, in
> _main
>(os.path.split(sys.argv[0])[-1], get_version()))
>  File "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/git_review/cmd.py", line 209, in
> get_version
>provider = pkg_resources.get_provider(requirement)
>  File
> "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.14-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
> line 177, in get_provider
>return working_set.find(moduleOrReq) or require(str(moduleOrReq))[0]
>  File
> "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.14-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
> line 654, in require
>needed = self.resolve(parse_requirements(requirements))
>  File
> "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.14-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
> line 552, in resolve
>raise DistributionNotFound(req)
> pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: git-review
> 
> If I run "pip install --upgrade setuptools":
> Requirement already up-to-date: setuptools in
> /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages
> 
> If I run "pip install -U git-review":
> Requirement already up-to-date: git-review in
> /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages
> Requirement already up-to-date: argparse in
> /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages (from git-review)
> Requirement already up-to-date: requests>=1.1 in
> /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages (from git-review)
> 
> If I run "/usr/bin/easy_install --version":
> distribute 0.6.14
> 
> I couldn't find any solution on Google or in our git-review docs. Any
> suggestions?
> ___
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

---
Brandon Harris :: bhar...@gaijin.com :: made of steel wool and whiskey




___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] can't get git-review to work

2015-10-21 Thread Ryan Kaldari 
Tried Brandon's suggestion (and some others that I got privately), but no
luck. Also tried uninstalling and reinstalling git-review.

When I do "echo $PATH":
/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/Users/kaldari/bin:/usr/local/mysql/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/lib/php:/usr/local/php5/bin

which pip:
/usr/local/bin/pip

which easy_install:
/usr/local/bin/easy_install

which git-review:
/usr/local/bin/git-review

But 'git-review' or 'git review' still give the same stack trace. I'll try
asking in #git. Thanks for the suggestions!

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Kevin Smith  wrote:

> I'm a bit wikitech-l shy, but that looks very similar to this:
>
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/wikitech/481421
>
> Unfortunately, the solution didn't look all that satisfying to me, but
> maybe you can get something out of it.
>
>
>
> Kevin Smith
> Agile Coach, Wikimedia Foundation
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Ryan Kaldari 
> wrote:
>
>> Recently I upgraded my Mac to OSX 10.10.5 and upgraded a lot of other
>> stuff
>> in the process. But now I can't get git-review to work. Whenever I try to
>> run it, it gives the following stacktrace:
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/usr/local/bin/git-review", line 11, in 
>> sys.exit(main())
>>   File "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/git_review/cmd.py", line 1522,
>> in
>> main
>> _main()
>>   File "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/git_review/cmd.py", line 1377,
>> in
>> _main
>> (os.path.split(sys.argv[0])[-1], get_version()))
>>   File "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/git_review/cmd.py", line 209, in
>> get_version
>> provider = pkg_resources.get_provider(requirement)
>>   File
>>
>> "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.14-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
>> line 177, in get_provider
>> return working_set.find(moduleOrReq) or require(str(moduleOrReq))[0]
>>   File
>>
>> "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.14-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
>> line 654, in require
>> needed = self.resolve(parse_requirements(requirements))
>>   File
>>
>> "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/distribute-0.6.14-py2.7.egg/pkg_resources.py",
>> line 552, in resolve
>> raise DistributionNotFound(req)
>> pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: git-review
>>
>> If I run "pip install --upgrade setuptools":
>> Requirement already up-to-date: setuptools in
>> /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages
>>
>> If I run "pip install -U git-review":
>> Requirement already up-to-date: git-review in
>> /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages
>> Requirement already up-to-date: argparse in
>> /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages (from git-review)
>> Requirement already up-to-date: requests>=1.1 in
>> /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages (from git-review)
>>
>> If I run "/usr/bin/easy_install --version":
>> distribute 0.6.14
>>
>> I couldn't find any solution on Google or in our git-review docs. Any
>> suggestions?
>> ___
>> Wikitech-l mailing list
>> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
>
>
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

[Wikitech-l] Code of Conduct and publication of private non-harassing communication

2015-10-21 Thread Matthew Flaschen 
Quim has proposed an alternative wording for the text about 
republication of private communication.


You can comment at 
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Code_of_Conduct/Draft#New_proposal.2C_welcomes_feedback 
or to conduct-discuss...@wikimedia.org .


Thanks as always,

Matt Flaschen

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

[Wikitech-l] RFC meeting this week

2015-10-21 Thread Tim Starling 
In the next RFC meeting, we will discuss the following RFC:

* Hygienic (heredoc) arguments for templates


The meeting will be on the IRC channel #wikimedia-office on
chat.freenode.net at the following time:

* UTC: Wednesday 21:00
* US PDT: Wednesday 14:00
* Europe CEST: Wednesday 23:00
* Australia AEDT: Thursday 08:00

-- Tim Starling


___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l