Re: [Wikitech-l] Wikipedia in Pig Latin

Am 05.04.2016 um 21:47 schrieb Siebrand Mazeland: > We just had April fools. Please don't. A single test variant is fine, but > we don't need more. I realize that this was probably a joke. But i do think it would be useful. I'd be fine with making this an extension though, instead of baking it

Re: [Wikitech-l] Wikipedia in Pig Latin

We just had April fools. Please don't. A single test variant is fine, but we don't need more. On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Purodha Blissenbach wrote: > Yes, plase! > (I shall add the German semi-equivalent "Hühnersprache" [1] as soon as I > am able) > Purodha > >

Re: [Wikitech-l] Wikipedia in Pig Latin

Yes, plase! (I shall add the German semi-equivalent "Hühnersprache" [1] as soon as I am able) Purodha [1] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spielsprache#H.C3.BChnersprache On 05.04.2016 16:00, Daniel Kinzler wrote: Am 01.04.2016 um 19:08 schrieb C. Scott Ananian: On a somewhat serious note, I'm

[Wikitech-l] Migrating to Scap from Trebuchet, Timelines and Such

The Release Engineering team's goal for the April-June 2016 quarter is to move everything that is currently deployed with Trebuchet over to Scap. With the release of Scap 3.1.0, everything that is deployed via Trebuchet can be ported to Scap—it supports git-fat, restarting services, and there is

Re: [Wikitech-l] Kunal (User:Legoktm) moving to Parsing Team

I suppose you've figured out that I don't know how to write citations. Subtract -1 from N for all [N] in the body. :-) -S. On 04/05/2016 11:41 AM, Subramanya Sastry wrote: Hi everyone, We would like to let you know that Kunal (User:Legoktm for those who don’t already know) is moving inside

[Wikitech-l] Kunal (User:Legoktm) moving to Parsing Team

Hi everyone, We would like to let you know that Kunal (User:Legoktm for those who don’t already know) is moving inside the Editing Department from the Collaboration Team to the Parsing Team. The Collaboration team is grateful for Kunal’s great work over the past year, especially on the

Re: [Wikitech-l] Wikipedia in Pig Latin

On 2016-04-05 17:37, Jon Robson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Daniel Kinzler wrote: >> Yes, please! I have been using a patch that Liangent wrote a few years ago, but >> which never got merged, for exactly this purpose. Piglatin may just be a fun >> easter egg

Re: [Wikitech-l] tags are a usability nightmare for editing on mediawiki.org

2. Identifying document fragments for translation is another instance of the same problem of associating metadata with document fragments *across edits*. Citations, content-translation, comments-as-documentation, authorship information, maintaining-association-between-translated-fragments, etc.

Re: [Wikitech-l] Wikipedia in Pig Latin

+1. Where can I +2 this? On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Daniel Kinzler wrote: > Am 01.04.2016 um 19:08 schrieb C. Scott Ananian: >> On a somewhat serious note, I'm a big fan of enabling pig Latin as a >> language variant in enwiki. > > Yes, please! I have been using a

Re: [Wikitech-l] Wikipedia in Pig Latin

Am 01.04.2016 um 19:08 schrieb C. Scott Ananian: > On a somewhat serious note, I'm a big fan of enabling pig Latin as a > language variant in enwiki. Yes, please! I have been using a patch that Liangent wrote a few years ago, but which never got merged, for exactly this purpose. Piglatin may

Re: [Wikitech-l] productivity of mediawiki developers

I personally reserve -2 for "this is a fundamentally bad idea" or "this requires community consensus before being implemented". Anything that is fixable in the code should get a -1 or 0. Btw, I personally prefer to get -1 reviews over 0 reviews, simply because it's easier to spot them as "todo"

Re: [Wikitech-l] productivity of mediawiki developers

I think a review is valuable no matter what the score... with the possible exception of -2 which I fear is probably a bit too aggressive and unnecessary in our ecosystem for which reason the reading web team agreed to avoid the use of -2 except to stop merges in progress that were not ready. I

Re: [Wikitech-l] productivity of mediawiki developers

> I, for example, value better good -1 code reviews Same here. There are statistics for -1 too, two clicks away from the link I provided in the previous message. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/Reports/Code_review_activity Nemo ___ Wikitech-l

[Wikitech-l] The CoC and the problems in Wikimedia tech communities

Hi, back from the Hackathon in Jerusalem, where technical collaboration worked at its best. :) I have been asking hackathon participants about their opinions on the Code of Conduct, especially among volunteers that haven't participated in the draft. The replies could be mainly classified in two

Re: [Wikitech-l] tags are a usability nightmare for editing on mediawiki.org

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Ryan Kaldari wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Brion Vibber > wrote: > > > 2) Some/many pages use ... incorrectly: spanning > > paragraphs, markup level boundaries, etc. > > > > The documentation says to do

Re: [Wikitech-l] tags are a usability nightmare for editing on mediawiki.org

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Niklas Laxström wrote: > The use case for CX is very different from Translate's page > translation. Former supports one-time "free form" translation from one > language to one language. The latter supports maintaining >

Re: [Wikitech-l] tags are a usability nightmare for editing on mediawiki.org

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Brion Vibber wrote: > 2) Some/many pages use ... incorrectly: spanning > paragraphs, markup level boundaries, etc. > The documentation says to do it that way: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Extension:Translate/Page_translation_example