Re: [Wikitech-l] 2017-02-15 Scrum of Scrums meeting notes

2017-02-15 Thread Arlo Breault
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 8:01 PM, Pine W wrote: > > I'm happy to see "Starting to work on audio/video support in Parsoid (VE > will follow)". Any ETA on this? Links to Phab tickets would be appreciated > as well. Please see, https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T64270#2981630

Re: [Wikitech-l] 2017-02-15 Scrum of Scrums meeting notes

2017-02-15 Thread Pine W
I'm happy to see "Starting to work on audio/video support in Parsoid (VE will follow)". Any ETA on this? Links to Phab tickets would be appreciated as well. Thanks, Pine On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Grace Gellerman wrote: >

[Wikitech-l] Weigh in on whether to finalize "Amendments" section of Code of Conduct

2017-02-15 Thread Matthew Flaschen
Please comment on whether to approve the "Amendments" section of the draft Code of conduct for technical spaces. The draft text is at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=Code_of_Conduct/Draft=2389930#Page:_Code_of_Conduct.2FAmendments . You can comment at

Re: [Wikitech-l] Provisional notes for proposed revision table restructuring

2017-02-15 Thread Brion Vibber
Great feedback everybody -- I'll make more updates and we'll circle back for another discussion in a week or two! Meeting summary (full logs linked from there): https://tools.wmflabs.org/meetbot/wikimedia-office/2017/wikimedia-office.2017-02-15-22.01.html -- brion On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:06

[Wikitech-l] 2017-02-15 Scrum of Scrums meeting notes

2017-02-15 Thread Grace Gellerman
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Scrum_of_scrums/2017-02-15 = 2017-02-15 = == Technology == == Analytics == - Finished rebuilding pageview API for resiliency (10x improvments on throughput and latency were done last quarter). A “programatic way to get pageviews” was one of the most

Re: [Wikitech-l] Provisional notes for proposed revision table restructuring

2017-02-15 Thread Brion Vibber
Correction: 22:00 UTC / 2pm PST in #wikimedia-office. Sorry, I calculated with the wrong time by mistake! -- brion On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Brion Vibber wrote: > Whoops I forgot to mention in the list post -- we're planning to talk > about this topic in the

Re: [Wikitech-l] Results of the Developer Wishlist are in

2017-02-15 Thread Bryan Davis
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Gergo Tisza wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Jon Robson wrote: > >> I'd be interested to see how the priorities change. I'm interested >> specifically in what pain points newcomers to our code might experience.

Re: [Wikitech-l] Results of the Developer Wishlist are in

2017-02-15 Thread Gergo Tisza
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Jon Robson wrote: > I'd be interested to see how the priorities change. I'm interested > specifically in what pain points newcomers to our code might experience. We discussed running the wishlist in a more survey-like way (use Google Forms,

Re: [Wikitech-l] MediaWiki-Vagrant needs testers for Debian Jessie changes

2017-02-15 Thread Bartosz Dziewoński
It works! (On Windows, do setup.bat rather than ./setup.sh.) This is actually the third time I'm trying MediaWiki-Vagrant, and the first time I've gotten it to run (previous attempts ended with obscure error messages). So I'd say the Jessie migration was a success :) -- Bartosz Dziewoński

Re: [Wikitech-l] MediaWiki-Vagrant needs testers for Debian Jessie changes

2017-02-15 Thread Brion Vibber
Yesss! :) I'll test over the next few days. -- brion On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 2:53 AM, Bryan Davis wrote: > TL;DR See and try the new > jessie-migration branch. > > > The Wikimedia Foundation has been working on converting the

Re: [Wikitech-l] Results of the Developer Wishlist are in

2017-02-15 Thread Leon Ziemba
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Jon Robson wrote: > Would it be possible to also get these ranked such that they exclude WMF > staff? > > I'd be interested to see how the priorities change. I'm interested > specifically in what pain points newcomers to our code might

Re: [Wikitech-l] Results of the Developer Wishlist are in

2017-02-15 Thread Jon Robson
Would it be possible to also get these ranked such that they exclude WMF staff? I'd be interested to see how the priorities change. I'm interested specifically in what pain points newcomers to our code might experience. On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, 11:45 p.m. Quim Gil, wrote: > On