I suspect if this will work, they also created on a own OS which... isn't
popular at all.
Von: Wikitech-l im Auftrag von
Jonathan Morgan
Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Mai 2017 18:00
An: Wikimedia
anners).
--Steinsplitter
Von: Wikitech-l <wikitech-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org> im Auftrag von Andre
Klapper <aklap...@wikimedia.org>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. September 2016 15:58
An: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Betreff: Re: [Wikitech-l] Code of Conduct
On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 11:07 +0
Hello,
I am not sure where to ask, thus i write here. Sorry if this is the wrong place!
I noticed that a Code of Conduct for Phabricator is getting developed. Cool to
see that people are creating such a policy, it is standard yet in big other
projects. :-)
Just a few thoughts:
Unfortunately,
There are hundreds of files in
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Category:Files_with_unknown_copyright_status
Likely they schould be nominated after one week or moor automatically for
deletion (using parser function). Then a human can review it and press delete.
Likely Template:Information
Hello,
I hope this is the right place to ask, if not please excuse.
All files uploaded to MediaWiki.org must be available under a free license (no
"fair use" or "noncommercial").
What we do with files with unclear copyright status (no license, no author,
etc.) such as:
*
Well done! :-)
> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:55:40 +0100
> From: puro...@blissenbach.org
> To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] New [[Main Page]] for Wikitech
>
> Well done!
> Purodha
>
> On 29.01.2016 07:25, MZMcBride wrote:
> > Bryan Davis wrote:
> >>I've been working
Hi,
UploadWizard has a lot of bugs and is sometimes defacto unusable.
See error reports here:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Upload_Wizard_feedback
See also reports on phabricator.
It is a huge problem that the UploadWizard is not fixed for years now.
Especially during WLM we
Why we need a committee?
I think admins can enforce if necessary.
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 00:30:40 -0600
From: bawo...@gmail.com
To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] [Engineering] Code of conduct
On 8/22/15, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
David, thanks for this
Some thoughts about
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Code_of_conduct_for_technical_spaces/Draft
* I can't see community consensus (RFC) for this.
* I see a lot (maybe 70%) staffer edits there.
* It is complicated to understand the policy.
I have the feeling that only a few staffer building this.
You can integrate it in templates.
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 23:01:46 -0700
From: wiki.p...@gmail.com
To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wikitech-l] Geohack tools
I just now realized how powerful these tools are when I started clicking
around.
Nice .pdf ... but why it was necessary to post this to x-lists? Seems offtopic
here.
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 16:31:22 -0700
From: wiki.p...@gmail.com
To: wikimani...@lists.wikimedia.org; wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org;
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wikitech-l] Slides from
Apologies if I'm missing something but is there any reason why we can't do
image rotation on the client using the canvas JavaScript api?
Client side rotation takes ages, especially with big files.
Agreed! Most of that probably should be non-destructive editing that keeps
the original and
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] Provide a well-performing API to rotate an
image
Hi Steinsplitter,
On 16 July 2015 at 09:00, Steinsplitter Wiki
steinsplitter-w...@live.com
wrote:
Out of curiosity what is the problem with the bot that prevents it
from
working?
It is very
Hi,
I am not sure if this is the correct mailinglist to write.
Every week on commons a bot is rotating hunderts of files, however this bot
will stop working soon. In the last years tens of thousands files has been
rotated.
Rotating files is a vital feature on commons and therefore
On Jul 16, 2015 8:27 AM, Steinsplitter Wiki steinsplitter-w...@live.com
wrote:
Hi,
I am not sure if this is the correct mailinglist to write.
Every week on commons a bot is rotating hunderts of files, however this
bot will stop working soon. In the last years tens of thousands files
to rotate an image
Hi Steinsplitter,
On 16 July 2015 at 09:00, Steinsplitter Wiki steinsplitter-w...@live.com
wrote:
Out of curiosity what is the problem with the bot that prevents it from
working?
It is very old and bad written and needs a complete rewrite.
That doesn't really
All this unnecessary changes is just making wikicoders live hard. *sigh*
From: mai...@live.de
To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 08:17:41 +0200
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] API BREAKING CHANGE: Default continuation mode for
action=query will change at the end of this
Before playing around with api serious bugs should be fixed... I see xxXx
unresolved bugs on pahricator. It is frustrating
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 14:56:25 -0700
From: sp...@wikimedia.org
To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] API BREAKING CHANGE: Default
Maybe someone with enough time and knowledge can fork compat and keep it
alive...
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 13:03:03 +1000
From: jay...@gmail.com
To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] API BREAKING CHANGE: Default continuation mode for
action=query will change at the end
I'd like to thank John Daniel for all their work creating static-bz!
+1
From: aklap...@wikimedia.org
To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 17:13:08 +0200
Subject: [Wikitech-l] old-bugzilla.wikimedia.org to be switched off in favor
of static-bugzilla
Hi everybody!
I haven't followed this discussion, however i am wondering why api is not keep
backward compatible. This will break a lot of stuff and i am wondering why we
need such changes in the app---
Best :-)
Steinsplitter
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 16:42:47 -0400
From: bjor...@wikimedia.org
To:
, correct?
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 3:49 AM, Steinsplitter Wiki
steinsplitter-w...@live.com wrote:
I haven't followed this discussion, however i am wondering why api is not
keep backward compatible. This will break a lot of stuff and i am wondering
why we need such changes in the app
Most operator are volunteers and don't have time to change the code every month
because there is a change in the api. Because of this devs should keep the api
backward-compatible.
Also wondering why wee need this new api. The old one was imho perfectly.
Was the new api coded by WMF or by
It would be helpful to see how much mobile acconts getting indf. blocked (and
how much have all edits in main ns and file ns deleted)
Best
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 23:13:32 -0400
From: risker...@gmail.com
To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] Anonymous editing impact on
Hi,
I wanted to bring to your attention a few critical issues that are negatively
affecting the workof the Commons community and the wider Wikimedia projects.
First, there are about 36 unresolved bugs [0] in the Media storage component.
Swift is a vitalcomponent of the projects' ability to show
25 matches
Mail list logo