Re: [Wikitech-l] Turkey ban

I suspect if this will work, they also created on a own OS which... isn't popular at all. Von: Wikitech-l im Auftrag von Jonathan Morgan Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Mai 2017 18:00 An: Wikimedia

Re: [Wikitech-l] Code of Conduct

anners). --Steinsplitter Von: Wikitech-l <wikitech-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org> im Auftrag von Andre Klapper <aklap...@wikimedia.org> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. September 2016 15:58 An: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org Betreff: Re: [Wikitech-l] Code of Conduct   On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 11:07 +0

[Wikitech-l] Code of Conduct

Hello, I am not sure where to ask, thus i write here. Sorry if this is the wrong place! I noticed that a Code of Conduct for Phabricator is getting developed. Cool to see that people are creating such a policy, it is standard yet in big other projects. :-) Just a few thoughts: Unfortunately,

Re: [Wikitech-l] FW: File with an unknown copyright status on MediaWiki.org

There are hundreds of files in https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Category:Files_with_unknown_copyright_status Likely they schould be nominated after one week or moor automatically for deletion (using parser function). Then a human can review it and press delete. Likely Template:Information

[Wikitech-l] FW: File with an unknown copyright status on MediaWiki.org

Hello, I hope this is the right place to ask, if not please excuse. All files uploaded to MediaWiki.org must be available under a free license (no "fair use" or "noncommercial"). What we do with files with unclear copyright status (no license, no author, etc.) such as: *

Re: [Wikitech-l] New [[Main Page]] for Wikitech

Well done! :-) > Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:55:40 +0100 > From: puro...@blissenbach.org > To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] New [[Main Page]] for Wikitech > > Well done! > Purodha > > On 29.01.2016 07:25, MZMcBride wrote: > > Bryan Davis wrote: > >>I've been working

[Wikitech-l] UploadWizard long term problems

Hi, UploadWizard has a lot of bugs and is sometimes defacto unusable. See error reports here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Upload_Wizard_feedback See also reports on phabricator. It is a huge problem that the UploadWizard is not fixed for years now. Especially during WLM we

Re: [Wikitech-l] [Engineering] Code of conduct

Why we need a committee? I think admins can enforce if necessary. Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 00:30:40 -0600 From: bawo...@gmail.com To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] [Engineering] Code of conduct On 8/22/15, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote: David, thanks for this

Re: [Wikitech-l] Code of conduct committee

Some thoughts about https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Code_of_conduct_for_technical_spaces/Draft * I can't see community consensus (RFC) for this. * I see a lot (maybe 70%) staffer edits there. * It is complicated to understand the policy. I have the feeling that only a few staffer building this.

Re: [Wikitech-l] Geohack tools

You can integrate it in templates. Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 23:01:46 -0700 From: wiki.p...@gmail.com To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Wikitech-l] Geohack tools I just now realized how powerful these tools are when I started clicking around.

Re: [Wikitech-l] Slides from Lila's presentation at Wikimania

Nice .pdf ... but why it was necessary to post this to x-lists? Seems offtopic here. Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 16:31:22 -0700 From: wiki.p...@gmail.com To: wikimani...@lists.wikimedia.org; wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org; wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Wikitech-l] Slides from

Re: [Wikitech-l] Provide a well-performing API to rotate an image

Apologies if I'm missing something but is there any reason why we can't do image rotation on the client using the canvas JavaScript api? Client side rotation takes ages, especially with big files. Agreed! Most of that probably should be non-destructive editing that keeps the original and

Re: [Wikitech-l] Provide a well-performing API to rotate an image

Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] Provide a well-performing API to rotate an image Hi Steinsplitter, On 16 July 2015 at 09:00, Steinsplitter Wiki steinsplitter-w...@live.com wrote: Out of curiosity what is the problem with the bot that prevents it from working? It is very

[Wikitech-l] Provide a well-performing API to rotate an image

Hi, I am not sure if this is the correct mailinglist to write. Every week on commons a bot is rotating hunderts of files, however this bot will stop working soon. In the last years tens of thousands files has been rotated. Rotating files is a vital feature on commons and therefore

Re: [Wikitech-l] Provide a well-performing API to rotate an image

On Jul 16, 2015 8:27 AM, Steinsplitter Wiki steinsplitter-w...@live.com wrote: Hi, I am not sure if this is the correct mailinglist to write. Every week on commons a bot is rotating hunderts of files, however this bot will stop working soon. In the last years tens of thousands files

Re: [Wikitech-l] Provide a well-performing API to rotate an image

to rotate an image Hi Steinsplitter, On 16 July 2015 at 09:00, Steinsplitter Wiki steinsplitter-w...@live.com wrote: Out of curiosity what is the problem with the bot that prevents it from working? It is very old and bad written and needs a complete rewrite. That doesn't really

Re: [Wikitech-l] API BREAKING CHANGE: Default continuation mode for action=query will change at the end of this month

All this unnecessary changes is just making wikicoders live hard. *sigh* From: mai...@live.de To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 08:17:41 +0200 Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] API BREAKING CHANGE: Default continuation mode for action=query will change at the end of this

Re: [Wikitech-l] API BREAKING CHANGE: Default continuation mode for action=query will change at the end of this month

Before playing around with api serious bugs should be fixed... I see xxXx unresolved bugs on pahricator. It is frustrating Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 14:56:25 -0700 From: sp...@wikimedia.org To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] API BREAKING CHANGE: Default

Re: [Wikitech-l] API BREAKING CHANGE: Default continuation mode for action=query will change at the end of this month

Maybe someone with enough time and knowledge can fork compat and keep it alive... Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 13:03:03 +1000 From: jay...@gmail.com To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] API BREAKING CHANGE: Default continuation mode for action=query will change at the end

Re: [Wikitech-l] old-bugzilla.wikimedia.org to be switched off in favor of static-bugzilla

I'd like to thank John Daniel for all their work creating static-bz! +1 From: aklap...@wikimedia.org To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 17:13:08 +0200 Subject: [Wikitech-l] old-bugzilla.wikimedia.org to be switched off in favor of static-bugzilla Hi everybody!

Re: [Wikitech-l] API BREAKING CHANGE: Default continuation mode for action=query will change at the end of this month

I haven't followed this discussion, however i am wondering why api is not keep backward compatible. This will break a lot of stuff and i am wondering why we need such changes in the app--- Best :-) Steinsplitter Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 16:42:47 -0400 From: bjor...@wikimedia.org To:

Re: [Wikitech-l] API BREAKING CHANGE: Default continuation mode for action=query will change at the end of this month

, correct? On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 3:49 AM, Steinsplitter Wiki steinsplitter-w...@live.com wrote: I haven't followed this discussion, however i am wondering why api is not keep backward compatible. This will break a lot of stuff and i am wondering why we need such changes in the app

Re: [Wikitech-l] API BREAKING CHANGE: Default continuation mode for action=query will change at the end of this month

Most operator are volunteers and don't have time to change the code every month because there is a change in the api. Because of this devs should keep the api backward-compatible. Also wondering why wee need this new api. The old one was imho perfectly. Was the new api coded by WMF or by

Re: [Wikitech-l] Anonymous editing impact on mobile

It would be helpful to see how much mobile acconts getting indf. blocked (and how much have all edits in main ns and file ns deleted) Best Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 23:13:32 -0400 From: risker...@gmail.com To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] Anonymous editing impact on

[Wikitech-l] Too much open bugs (Wikimedia Commons, Media storage)

Hi, I wanted to bring to your attention a few critical issues that are negatively affecting the workof the Commons community and the wider Wikimedia projects. First, there are about 36 unresolved bugs [0] in the Media storage component. Swift is a vitalcomponent of the projects' ability to show