[Wikitech-l] SOA in .NET, or Microsoft is going open source MIT style

2015-02-04 Thread Yuri Astrakhan
flame war ahead For those not adicted to slashdot, see here http://news.slashdot.org/story/15/02/04/0332238/microsoft-open-sources-coreclr-the-net-execution-engine . Licenced under MIT https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr/blob/master/LICENSE.TXT, plus an additional patents promise

Re: [Wikitech-l] SOA in .NET, or Microsoft is going open source MIT style

2015-02-04 Thread Nikolas Everett
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Yuri Astrakhan yastrak...@wikimedia.org wrote: flame war ahead For those not adicted to slashdot, see here http://news.slashdot.org/story/15/02/04/0332238/microsoft-open-sources-coreclr-the-net-execution-engine . Licenced under MIT

Re: [Wikitech-l] SOA in .NET, or Microsoft is going open source MIT style

2015-02-04 Thread David Gerard
Functionally. If you make a loud public declaration WE SHALL NOT SUE then you sue, judges *tend* to look upon it very unfavourably. YMMV of course. On 4 February 2015 at 13:42, Nikolas Everett never...@wikimedia.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Yuri Astrakhan yastrak...@wikimedia.org