Thanks Erik for the extensive response.
Ultimately what counts is ongoing progress. If the model proposed is an
improvement from the current, solving specific problems we currently
have, then fine and I'm all or it.
I'm still stuck in one point:
On 11/19/2012 07:54 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
There is a blog post video circulating these days, about how GitHub Inc is
organized as a company. They also manage a version control system promoting
decentralized collaboration, plus other tools supporting this core goal and
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Quim Gil quim...@gmail.com wrote:
While it makes total sense to organize Product Management, Design and
Analytics under Product Development, it feels old school and odd to leave
out the software engineers fully dedicated to product development. It
enforces
Quim, thanks for writing that. I am happy about the conversations that are
happening about this, and I'm finding people's thoughts and input useful.
There have been (and are being) lots of face-to-face conversations as well
as the ones on the lists and in other venues: it's all good.
There is of
Sue Gardner, 08/11/2012 07:03:
I kind of have the sense that people are considering this a done
deal. [...]
So to be super-clear: None of this is a done deal at this moment. Lots
of conversations are happening in various places, and it's all good.
That's why Erik made the pre-announcement
Thank you, Erik. Before (or rather than) commenting, I have a single
question below; the rest of the email is just a premise+addendum to it. ;-)
Terry Chay, 07/11/2012 21:04:
You aren't the only one. It turns out we use a lot of industry
terminology, without realizing that we are
On 07/11/12 22:21, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
Terry Chay, 07/11/2012 21:04:
You aren't the only one. It turns out we use a lot of industry
terminology, without realizing that we are poorly communicating what
that means to most people. [...]
First of all, this will help greatly to the
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/11/12 22:21, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
Terry Chay, 07/11/2012 21:04:
You aren't the only one. It turns out we use a lot of industry
terminology, without realizing that we are poorly communicating what
that
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your explanation but personally I'm more confused than before
about the difference between Engineering and Product, also because the
terminology didn't appear internally consistent. :-)
I feel like you,
Picking up this thread as Erik asked me to explain the different functions
that fall under Product. To do that, it's worth describing in a bit more
detail how our project teams work.
This may be a bit reductive (apologies in advance), but there are a basic
set of things that need to happen when
Hey folks,
I think all the conversation about this is really helpful, and it's
been particularly useful thus far to hear from community members about
what's confusing about the current and proposed structures. (Not
being confusing isn't the primary motivation for a restructure, but
it's obviously
11 matches
Mail list logo
