Re: [Wikitech-l] [WikimediaMobile] The future of Related Pages feature

2016-04-04 Thread Jon Katz
This is great discussion and I would like others to benefit from it by moving future conversation to the discussion page of the RFC. For this reason, I have double posted the below response there: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Requests_for_comment/Related_Pages#overlap_with_see_also

Re: [Wikitech-l] [WikimediaMobile] The future of Related Pages feature

2016-04-04 Thread Jonathan Morgan
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Moushira Elamrawy wrote: > ... > In fact, we are not sure if an rfc is the best strategy to move forward > with product decisions, but lets see how the discussion evolves, and we > might explore the need for a different process, as we

Re: [Wikitech-l] [WikimediaMobile] The future of Related Pages feature

2016-04-04 Thread Joaquin Oltra Hernandez
Thank you for testing it Vituzzu. If I recall correctly the images got worse because of a change to the PageImages extension so that copyrighted images wouldn't be used outside of the main article page (which are usually the good representative images in a lot of articles in english wikipedia

Re: [Wikitech-l] [WikimediaMobile] The future of Related Pages feature

2016-04-04 Thread Jon Robson
1) The related articles are editable via the {{RelatedArticles}} magic word. They have been since day one of launch. 2) There is a great conversation around how this feature could serve as a see also replacement here:https://www.mediawiki.org/w/

Re: [Wikitech-l] [WikimediaMobile] The future of Related Pages feature

2016-04-04 Thread Vituzzu
I have nothing against "related pages", I've been testing it for a while but: *its graphics suddenly worsened not so much time after the first release *it often overlaps with pages already listed in "see also" section *some results aren't relevant at all IMHO all these issues should be

Re: [Wikitech-l] [WikimediaMobile] The future of Related Pages feature

2016-04-04 Thread John Mark Vandenberg
This feature appears to be an automated edition of the "See also" section on English Wikipedia. Having both Related Articles and See also feels like a usability issue. Has there been any discussions on the wikis about this overlap? On 24 Mar 2016 05:18, "Moushira Elamrawy"