This is great discussion and I would like others to benefit from it by
moving future conversation to the discussion page of the RFC. For this
reason, I have double posted the below response there:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Requests_for_comment/Related_Pages#overlap_with_see_also
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Moushira Elamrawy
wrote:
> ...
>
In fact, we are not sure if an rfc is the best strategy to move forward
> with product decisions, but lets see how the discussion evolves, and we
> might explore the need for a different process, as we
Thank you for testing it Vituzzu. If I recall correctly the images got
worse because of a change to the PageImages extension so that copyrighted
images wouldn't be used outside of the main article page (which are usually
the good representative images in a lot of articles in english wikipedia
1) The related articles are editable via the {{RelatedArticles}} magic
word. They have been since day one of launch.
2) There is a great conversation around how this feature could serve as a
see also replacement here:https://www.mediawiki.org/w/
I have nothing against "related pages", I've been testing it for a while
but:
*its graphics suddenly worsened not so much time after the first release
*it often overlaps with pages already listed in "see also" section
*some results aren't relevant at all
IMHO all these issues should be
This feature appears to be an automated edition of the "See also" section
on English Wikipedia. Having both Related Articles and See also feels like
a usability issue.
Has there been any discussions on the wikis about this overlap?
On 24 Mar 2016 05:18, "Moushira Elamrawy"