I'd like to add that the md5 of the *uncompressed* file is
cd4eee6d3d745ce716db2931c160ee35 . That's what I got from both the
uncompressed 7z and the uncompressed bz2. They matched, whew.
Uncompressing and md5ing the bz2 took well over a week. Uncompressing and
md5ing the 7z took less than a
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Q overlo...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 4/8/2010 4:28 PM, Anthony wrote:
I'd like to add that the md5 of the *uncompressed* file is
cd4eee6d3d745ce716db2931c160ee35 . That's what I got from both the
uncompressed 7z
Got an md5sum?
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Tomasz Finc tf...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I love lzma compression.
enwiki-20100130-pages-meta-history.xml.bz2 280.3 GB
enwiki-20100130-pages-meta-history.xml.7z 31.9 GB
Download at http://tinyurl.com/yeelbse
Enjoy!
--tomasz
Tomasz Finc
You can find all the md5sums at
http://download.wikipedia.org/enwiki/20100130/enwiki-20100130-md5sums.txt
--tomasz
Anthony wrote:
Got an md5sum?
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Tomasz Finc tf...@wikimedia.org
mailto:tf...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I love lzma compression.
On Mar 19 2010, Platonides wrote:
Zeyi wrote:
Hi,
Firstly, congratulations for this! as i Know it has taken for a long
time!
and May I ask a small question: what difference between current dump and
history dump. I know current one only includes current edits, and history
one has all
On 03/19/2010 11:02 AM, zh...@york.ac.uk wrote:
What I mean is that if the current dump show there are 30 edits under the
particular article name, and history dump show there are 100 edits under
the same article. what's different between these 30 and 100?
The current dump shows 1 edit for
On Mar 19 2010, Conrad Irwin wrote:
On 03/19/2010 11:02 AM, zh...@york.ac.uk wrote:
What I mean is that if the current dump show there are 30 edits under
the particular article name, and history dump show there are 100 edits
under the same article. what's different between these 30 and
Hi,
Firstly, congratulations for this! as i Know it has taken for a long time!
and May I ask a small question: what difference between current dump and
history dump. I know current one only includes current edits, and history
one has all edits as introduction said. More specifically, how
Zeyi wrote:
Hi,
Firstly, congratulations for this! as i Know it has taken for a long time!
and May I ask a small question: what difference between current dump and
history dump. I know current one only includes current edits, and history
one has all edits as introduction said.
You have
Date:
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:15:24 +0100
From: Platonides
platoni...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l]
[Xmldatadumps-admin-l] 2010-03-11 01:10:08:
enwiki Checksumming
pages-meta-history.xml.bz2 :D
To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Message-ID:
hnqo49$it...@dough.gmane.org
Content
--- El mar, 16/3/10, Kevin Webb kpw...@gmail.com escribió:
De: Kevin Webb kpw...@gmail.com
Asunto: Re: [Xmldatadumps-admin-l] 2010-03-11 01:10:08: enwiki Checksumming
pages-meta-history.xml.bz2 :D
Para: Tomasz Finc tf...@wikimedia.org
CC: Wikimedia developers
Let alone that, for some of us outside USA (and even with a good connection to
the EU resarch network) the download process takes, so to say, slightly more
time than expected (and is prone to errors as the file gets larger).
So other +1 to replace bzip with 7zip.
F.
--- El mar, 16/3/10,
Tomasz Finc wrote:
New full history en wiki snapshot is hot off the presses!
It's currently being checksummed which will take a while for 280GB+ of
compressed data but for those brave souls willing to test please grab it
from
--- El jue, 11/3/10, Tomasz Finc tf...@wikimedia.org escribió:
De: Tomasz Finc tf...@wikimedia.org
Asunto: [Xmldatadumps-admin-l] 2010-03-11 01:10:08: enwiki Checksumming
pages-meta-history.xml.bz2 :D
Para: Wikimedia developers wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org,
Tomasz Finc wrote:
Brian J Mingus wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Tomasz Finctf...@wikimedia.org
mailto:tf...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Yup, that's the one. If you have a fast upload pipe then I'm more then
happy to setup space for it. Otherwise it should be arriving in our
Thankfully due to an awesome volunteer we'll be able to get that 2008
snapshot in our archive. I'll mail out when it shows up in our snail mail.
--tomasz
Erik Zachte wrote:
I'm thrilled. Big thanks to Tim and Tomasz for pulling this off.
For the record the 2008-10-03 dump existed for a short
Yup, that's the one. If you have a fast upload pipe then I'm more then
happy to setup space for it. Otherwise it should be arriving in our
snail mail after a couple of days.
-tomasz
Kevin Webb wrote:
Many thanks to everyone involved.
Also, in case it's of use to anyone I have a copy of the
Brian J Mingus wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Tomasz Finc tf...@wikimedia.org
mailto:tf...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Yup, that's the one. If you have a fast upload pipe then I'm more then
happy to setup space for it. Otherwise it should be arriving in our
snail mail after
18 matches
Mail list logo
