Re: [Wikitech-l] Adopting Composer's composer.json for extensions

2015-02-16 Thread Mark A. Hershberger
Legoktm writes: > Can we please centralize this discussion? We're discussing this > on-wiki, and now it's spread to Phabricator and wikitech-l. I apologize for the diffusion. I'm trying to get attention on this issue, but obviously I've overstepped. I'm fine with continuing on-wiki and in the

Re: [Wikitech-l] Adopting Composer's composer.json for extensions

2015-02-16 Thread Legoktm
On 02/16/2015 09:34 AM, Mark A. Hershberger wrote: I've opened a task on Phabricator[1] to attempt to merge the information in extension.json with Composer's already-used-by-several-extensions-and-skins composer.json. Can we please centralize this discussion? We're discussing this on-wiki, an

Re: [Wikitech-l] Adopting Composer's composer.json for extensions

2015-02-16 Thread Daniel Friesen
On 2015-02-16 9:34 AM, Mark A. Hershberger wrote: > I've opened a task on Phabricator[1] to attempt to merge the information > in extension.json with Composer's > already-used-by-several-extensions-and-skins composer.json. > > Kunal has rightly pointed out that composer doesn't fit some use-cases >

Re: [Wikitech-l] Adopting Composer's composer.json for extensions

2015-02-16 Thread Bryan Davis
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Mark A. Hershberger wrote: > > I've opened a task on Phabricator[1] to attempt to merge the information > in extension.json with Composer's > already-used-by-several-extensions-and-skins composer.json. > > Kunal has rightly pointed out that composer doesn't fit s

[Wikitech-l] Adopting Composer's composer.json for extensions

2015-02-16 Thread Mark A. Hershberger
I've opened a task on Phabricator[1] to attempt to merge the information in extension.json with Composer's already-used-by-several-extensions-and-skins composer.json. Kunal has rightly pointed out that composer doesn't fit some use-cases for MediaWiki. I see that as an opportunity to be good cit