Re: [Wikitech-l] Needs Volunteer priority field value in Phabricator
Patch to change 'Needs Volunteer' back to 'Lowest' https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/192205/ has six +1s but nobody's +2'd it. (I would but I don't have +2 in that repo.) Do we have enough consensus to continue on with this change or are we still collecting feedback on https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T78617? -- brion On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org wrote: Apparently the idea to rename the Priority field value from Lowest in Bugzilla to Needs Volunteer in Phabricator created more confusion than expected. I am sorry for that - wasn't intended. To fix that, there are two questions that welcome input in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T78617 : 1) Our Phabricator currently offers six levels of prioritization. See https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Project_management#Priority_levels Do project maintainers / devs really feel a need for planning to differentiate between low priority and one level below that? Or could we reduce our six levels with five levels? 2) If there is a need for a level below low: Let's rename Needs Volunteer back to Lowest (Looking at the proposed names in T78617, Lowest seems to be the least confusing term / smallest evil.) If you feel like helping make a decision by adding some *additional* arguments based on your experience, please raise your voice in T78617 after reading the existing comments and arguments in that task. Thank you for your help! andre -- Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Needs Volunteer priority field value in Phabricator
As the famous poet Monte Hurd once said... SHIP IT! Dan On Wednesday, February 25, 2015, Brion Vibber bvib...@wikimedia.org wrote: Patch to change 'Needs Volunteer' back to 'Lowest' https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/192205/ has six +1s but nobody's +2'd it. (I would but I don't have +2 in that repo.) Do we have enough consensus to continue on with this change or are we still collecting feedback on https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T78617? -- brion On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org javascript:; wrote: Apparently the idea to rename the Priority field value from Lowest in Bugzilla to Needs Volunteer in Phabricator created more confusion than expected. I am sorry for that - wasn't intended. To fix that, there are two questions that welcome input in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T78617 : 1) Our Phabricator currently offers six levels of prioritization. See https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Project_management#Priority_levels Do project maintainers / devs really feel a need for planning to differentiate between low priority and one level below that? Or could we reduce our six levels with five levels? 2) If there is a need for a level below low: Let's rename Needs Volunteer back to Lowest (Looking at the proposed names in T78617, Lowest seems to be the least confusing term / smallest evil.) If you feel like helping make a decision by adding some *additional* arguments based on your experience, please raise your voice in T78617 after reading the existing comments and arguments in that task. Thank you for your help! andre -- Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org javascript:; https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org javascript:; https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- Dan Garry Associate Product Manager, Mobile Apps Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Needs Volunteer priority field value in Phabricator
Ok Daniel Zahn poked it. :) -- brion On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Dan Garry dga...@wikimedia.org wrote: As the famous poet Monte Hurd once said... SHIP IT! Dan On Wednesday, February 25, 2015, Brion Vibber bvib...@wikimedia.org wrote: Patch to change 'Needs Volunteer' back to 'Lowest' https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/192205/ has six +1s but nobody's +2'd it. (I would but I don't have +2 in that repo.) Do we have enough consensus to continue on with this change or are we still collecting feedback on https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T78617? -- brion On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org javascript:; wrote: Apparently the idea to rename the Priority field value from Lowest in Bugzilla to Needs Volunteer in Phabricator created more confusion than expected. I am sorry for that - wasn't intended. To fix that, there are two questions that welcome input in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T78617 : 1) Our Phabricator currently offers six levels of prioritization. See https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Project_management#Priority_levels Do project maintainers / devs really feel a need for planning to differentiate between low priority and one level below that? Or could we reduce our six levels with five levels? 2) If there is a need for a level below low: Let's rename Needs Volunteer back to Lowest (Looking at the proposed names in T78617, Lowest seems to be the least confusing term / smallest evil.) If you feel like helping make a decision by adding some *additional* arguments based on your experience, please raise your voice in T78617 after reading the existing comments and arguments in that task. Thank you for your help! andre -- Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org javascript:; https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org javascript:; https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- Dan Garry Associate Product Manager, Mobile Apps Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Needs Volunteer priority field value in Phabricator
I like that volunteer flag, please keep it. On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org wrote: Apparently the idea to rename the Priority field value from Lowest in Bugzilla to Needs Volunteer in Phabricator created more confusion than expected. I am sorry for that - wasn't intended. To fix that, there are two questions that welcome input in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T78617 : 1) Our Phabricator currently offers six levels of prioritization. See https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Project_management#Priority_levels Do project maintainers / devs really feel a need for planning to differentiate between low priority and one level below that? Or could we reduce our six levels with five levels? 2) If there is a need for a level below low: Let's rename Needs Volunteer back to Lowest (Looking at the proposed names in T78617, Lowest seems to be the least confusing term / smallest evil.) If you feel like helping make a decision by adding some *additional* arguments based on your experience, please raise your voice in T78617 after reading the existing comments and arguments in that task. Thank you for your help! andre -- Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Needs Volunteer priority field value in Phabricator
On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 18:48 +0100, Petr Bena wrote: I like that volunteer flag, please keep it. Let me repeat what I wrote below: If you feel like helping make a decision by adding some *additional* arguments based on your experience, please raise your voice in T78617 after reading the existing comments and arguments in that task. Thanks. ;) andre On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org wrote: Apparently the idea to rename the Priority field value from Lowest in Bugzilla to Needs Volunteer in Phabricator created more confusion than expected. I am sorry for that - wasn't intended. To fix that, there are two questions that welcome input in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T78617 : 1) Our Phabricator currently offers six levels of prioritization. See https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Project_management#Priority_levels Do project maintainers / devs really feel a need for planning to differentiate between low priority and one level below that? Or could we reduce our six levels with five levels? 2) If there is a need for a level below low: Let's rename Needs Volunteer back to Lowest (Looking at the proposed names in T78617, Lowest seems to be the least confusing term / smallest evil.) If you feel like helping make a decision by adding some *additional* arguments based on your experience, please raise your voice in T78617 after reading the existing comments and arguments in that task. Thank you for your help! andre -- Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[Wikitech-l] Needs Volunteer priority field value in Phabricator
Apparently the idea to rename the Priority field value from Lowest in Bugzilla to Needs Volunteer in Phabricator created more confusion than expected. I am sorry for that - wasn't intended. To fix that, there are two questions that welcome input in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T78617 : 1) Our Phabricator currently offers six levels of prioritization. See https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Project_management#Priority_levels Do project maintainers / devs really feel a need for planning to differentiate between low priority and one level below that? Or could we reduce our six levels with five levels? 2) If there is a need for a level below low: Let's rename Needs Volunteer back to Lowest (Looking at the proposed names in T78617, Lowest seems to be the least confusing term / smallest evil.) If you feel like helping make a decision by adding some *additional* arguments based on your experience, please raise your voice in T78617 after reading the existing comments and arguments in that task. Thank you for your help! andre -- Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Needs Volunteer priority field value in Phabricator
On Fri Feb 13 2015 at 9:43:00 AM Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org wrote: Apparently the idea to rename the Priority field value from Lowest in Bugzilla to Needs Volunteer in Phabricator created more confusion than expected. I am sorry for that - wasn't intended. To fix that, there are two questions that welcome input in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T78617 : 1) Our Phabricator currently offers six levels of prioritization. See https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/Project_ management#Priority_levels Do project maintainers / devs really feel a need for planning to differentiate between low priority and one level below that? Or could we reduce our six levels with five levels? I'd be fine with just 5. I think anything below normal signifies that nobody's going to work on it, I don't think we need two degrees to differentiate here. 2) If there is a need for a level below low: Let's rename Needs Volunteer back to Lowest (Looking at the proposed names in T78617, Lowest seems to be the least confusing term / smallest evil.) This would be my second choice. Needs volunteer isn't clear to everyone as we've seen. -Chad ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
