Il 20/10/2014 22:53, Luis Villa ha scritto:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Ricordisamoa ricordisa...@openmailbox.org
wrote:
Are there policies/guidelines regarding the use of third-party icons in
software maintained on WMF's Gerrit instance (e.g. MediaWiki extensions)?
I'm unaware of any
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Ricordisamoa ricordisa...@openmailbox.org
wrote:
Are there policies/guidelines regarding the use of third-party icons in
software maintained on WMF's Gerrit instance (e.g. MediaWiki extensions)?
I'm unaware of any formal policies, aside from a general
Il 04/09/2014 04:11, Ricordisamoa ha scritto:
Are there policies/guidelines regarding the use of third-party icons
in software maintained on WMF's Gerrit instance (e.g. MediaWiki
extensions)?
For example, the Chameleon
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Skin:Chameleon skin appears to use
I am not employed by the WMF nor do I know the relevant policies of
the WMF. I am also not a lawyer.
I do not think that the use of Glyphicons is a problem in the case of Chameleon.
1. The Chameleon skin does not actually contain the Glyphicons
Halflings font. In fact, it does not even contain
On Thursday, September 4, 2014, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Ricordisamoa ricordisa...@openmailbox.org
javascript:;
wrote:
Even git.wikimedia.org https://git.wikimedia.org uses Glyphicons (the
free PNG version) without complying with the CC-BY 3.0
