RE: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MVL
I updated the book collections in the MVL:
- replaced obsolete SVN articles with their git/gerrit counterparts
- modified the saved_book template: in addition to PDF downloads, e-book
epub download link is available
These books are presently in the MVL
2013/1/2 Matthew Flaschen mflasc...@wikimedia.org
He may have misspoke on the we part. However, for wikis with bot
approval processes (e.g.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_Approvals_Group ), there is
tracking on what bots work on (due to the potentially disruptive nature
of an
What I would like is really something simple that says when something
is to be made available, and what would be the visible feature. At
least what is to be expected for the next 2-3 months, preferable with
something about which roll-out cycle and a last date to give a go (or
stop) on the planned
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:16 AM, John Erling Blad jeb...@gmail.com wrote:
What I would like is really something simple that says when something
is to be made available, and what would be the visible feature. At
least what is to be expected for the next 2-3 months, preferable with
something
On Tue, 2013-01-01 at 22:36 -0700, Mono wrote:
The video player still looks ugly (by the way) compared to a YouTube/Vimeo
or even a standard Kaltura player...
Assuming you refer to the new player [1]:
If you have specific improvements in mind, please feel free to file
enhancement requests in
On 01/02/2013 03:29 AM, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
He may have misspoke on the we part. However, for wikis with bot
approval processes (e.g.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_Approvals_Group ), there is
tracking on what bots work on (due to the potentially disruptive nature
of an active
Dear Pine,
thank you for sharing these links. I cannot read everything now, but one of
these warticles was also recommended by a friend, Sure, Big Data Is Great.
But So Is
Intuition.http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/30/technology/big-data-is-great-but-dont-forget-intuition.html?_r=1;,
by Steve
This is not about bot status (+bot) but about its system status (UP / DOWN
etc)
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Lars Aronsson l...@aronsson.se wrote:
On 01/02/2013 03:29 AM, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
He may have misspoke on the we part. However, for wikis with bot
approval processes (e.g.
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Bryan Tong Minh
bryan.tongm...@gmail.comwrote:
This is an annoyance to me as well. So, I went triaging, and finally found
the issues that failed the unit tests for me. I have committed fixes for
them to gerrit:
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/41362/
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:02 AM, Thomas Gries m...@tgries.de wrote:
mwbook #06 MediaWiki Git Guide (MGG)
Please do not add more pages to the Git documentation.
It's confusing enough for people as it is.
-Chad
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
On 01/02/2013 03:03 AM, Bináris wrote:
Before generalizing it will be very useful to overview various
wikis. According to the interwikis, very few wikis have an explicit
bot policy like enwiki and even less have BAG. Definition of a bot
may vary, too: in the bot policy of enwiki only
On 01/02/2013 08:25 AM, Lars Aronsson wrote:
On 01/02/2013 03:29 AM, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
He may have misspoke on the we part. However, for wikis with bot
approval processes (e.g.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_Approvals_Group ), there is
tracking on what bots work on (due to
Matt, let's be clearer then: what you describe is ok ONLY for en.wiki.
ALL the other wikis have a different system.
Thanks,
Nemo
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
On 01/02/2013 01:24 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
Matt, let's be clearer then: what you describe is ok ONLY for en.wiki.
ALL the other wikis have a different system.
I was replying to Lars, who made the across-the-board statement once
the status is granted, that idea can change without having
The Editor Engagement team will be holding a special Echo IRC office
hours specifically for developers next Tuesday. We would like to let the
other developers know what we're up to and allow them to ask any
questions they may have about the Echo Notifications system. Since Echo
is designed to
On 12/28/2012 07:08 PM, Merlijn van Deen wrote:
(responding to Siebrand, although others have made the same p
I hope that you're excluding adding people as reviewer to all patch sets by
user L10n-bot, by the way...
Initially not, but I just added an exception for L10n-bot - all it's
changes
On 2 January 2013 21:34, Matthew Flaschen mflasc...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Thank you Could you please also exclude the owner? In other words,
don't add the owner as a reviewer to their own change.
Fixed!
Merlijn
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
On 01/02/2013 05:38 PM, Merlijn van Deen wrote:
On 2 January 2013 21:34, Matthew Flaschen mflasc...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Thank you Could you please also exclude the owner? In other words,
don't add the owner as a reviewer to their own change.
Great, thank you.
Matt Flaschen
18 matches
Mail list logo
