On 4.4.2013 21:46, Michiel Beijen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:25 PM, kmx wrote:
C:\strawberry\cpan\build\Log-Log4perl-1.40-XYO4Rb\blib\lib/Log/Log4perl/Resurrector.pm
line 28.t/053Resurrect.t .
Dubious, test returned 253 (wstat 64768, 0xfd00)
You have to downgrade File::Temp to vers
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:25 PM, kmx wrote:
>> C:\strawberry\cpan\build\Log-Log4perl-1.40-XYO4Rb\blib\lib/Log/Log4perl/Resurrector.pm
>> line 28.t/053Resurrect.t .
>> Dubious, test returned 253 (wstat 64768, 0xfd00)
>
> You have to downgrade File::Temp to version 0.22 then it works nice with
>
On 4.4.2013 16:46, Michiel Beijen wrote:
Hi kmx,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:25 PM, kmx wrote:
So, 32bit strawberry perl 5.18.x will be built with USE_64_BIT_INT
You can test 5.17.10 beta (32bit+USE_64_BIT_INT) from:
http://strawberryperl.com/beta/ (MSI+ZIP+Portable)
Great! I'm using it right
Hi kmx,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:25 PM, kmx wrote:
> So, 32bit strawberry perl 5.18.x will be built with USE_64_BIT_INT
>
> You can test 5.17.10 beta (32bit+USE_64_BIT_INT) from:
> http://strawberryperl.com/beta/ (MSI+ZIP+Portable)
Great! I'm using it right now to test some modules.
I got this
So, 32bit strawberry perl 5.18.x will be built with USE_64_BIT_INT
You can test 5.17.10 beta (32bit+USE_64_BIT_INT) from:
http://strawberryperl.com/beta/ (MSI+ZIP+Portable)
--
kmx
-Original Message-
From: kmx
> ActivePerl binaries (ppm packages) will not be usable on the 64int
> architecture Strawberry Perl - unless, of course, ActiveState also start
> providing packages for the 64int architecture. (I've no idea what
> ActiveState are planning to do in this reg
On 13.3.2013 23:14, sisyph...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
-Original Message- From: kmx
Hi,
is anybody against turning on USE_64_BIT_INT in coming 32bit Strawberry
Perl 5.18.x series ?
I have done some testing with PDL guys approx a year ago on 5.16.0 (I guess
Rob is also subscribed to this
Hi,
is anybody against turning on USE_64_BIT_INT in coming 32bit Strawberry
Perl 5.18.x series ?
I have done some testing with PDL guys approx a year ago on 5.16.0 (I guess
Rob is also subscribed to this list) and AFAIK it works.
Pros:
1/ perl core 5.17.* supports building perl with USE_64
-Original Message-
From: kmx
Hi,
is anybody against turning on USE_64_BIT_INT in coming 32bit Strawberry
Perl 5.18.x series ?
I have done some testing with PDL guys approx a year ago on 5.16.0 (I
guess
Rob is also subscribed to this list) and AFAIK it works.
I've been testing it c
Hi,
is anybody against turning on USE_64_BIT_INT in coming 32bit Strawberry
Perl 5.18.x series ?
I have done some testing with PDL guys approx a year ago on 5.16.0 (I guess
Rob is also subscribed to this list) and AFAIK it works.
Pros:
1/ perl core 5.17.* supports building perl with USE_64
10 matches
Mail list logo