Re: Call for opinion: strawberry perl 5.18.x/32bit with USE_64_BIT_INT

2013-04-04 Thread kmx
On 4.4.2013 21:46, Michiel Beijen wrote: On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:25 PM, kmx wrote: C:\strawberry\cpan\build\Log-Log4perl-1.40-XYO4Rb\blib\lib/Log/Log4perl/Resurrector.pm line 28.t/053Resurrect.t . Dubious, test returned 253 (wstat 64768, 0xfd00) You have to downgrade File::Temp to vers

Re: Call for opinion: strawberry perl 5.18.x/32bit with USE_64_BIT_INT

2013-04-04 Thread Michiel Beijen
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:25 PM, kmx wrote: >> C:\strawberry\cpan\build\Log-Log4perl-1.40-XYO4Rb\blib\lib/Log/Log4perl/Resurrector.pm >> line 28.t/053Resurrect.t . >> Dubious, test returned 253 (wstat 64768, 0xfd00) > > You have to downgrade File::Temp to version 0.22 then it works nice with >

Re: Call for opinion: strawberry perl 5.18.x/32bit with USE_64_BIT_INT

2013-04-04 Thread kmx
On 4.4.2013 16:46, Michiel Beijen wrote: Hi kmx, On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:25 PM, kmx wrote: So, 32bit strawberry perl 5.18.x will be built with USE_64_BIT_INT You can test 5.17.10 beta (32bit+USE_64_BIT_INT) from: http://strawberryperl.com/beta/ (MSI+ZIP+Portable) Great! I'm using it right

Re: Call for opinion: strawberry perl 5.18.x/32bit with USE_64_BIT_INT

2013-04-04 Thread Michiel Beijen
Hi kmx, On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:25 PM, kmx wrote: > So, 32bit strawberry perl 5.18.x will be built with USE_64_BIT_INT > > You can test 5.17.10 beta (32bit+USE_64_BIT_INT) from: > http://strawberryperl.com/beta/ (MSI+ZIP+Portable) Great! I'm using it right now to test some modules. I got this

Re: Call for opinion: strawberry perl 5.18.x/32bit with USE_64_BIT_INT

2013-04-03 Thread kmx
So, 32bit strawberry perl 5.18.x will be built with USE_64_BIT_INT You can test 5.17.10 beta (32bit+USE_64_BIT_INT) from: http://strawberryperl.com/beta/ (MSI+ZIP+Portable) -- kmx

Re: Call for opinion: strawberry perl 5.18.x/32bit with USE_64_BIT_INT

2013-03-14 Thread sisyphus1
-Original Message- From: kmx > ActivePerl binaries (ppm packages) will not be usable on the 64int > architecture Strawberry Perl - unless, of course, ActiveState also start > providing packages for the 64int architecture. (I've no idea what > ActiveState are planning to do in this reg

Re: Call for opinion: strawberry perl 5.18.x/32bit with USE_64_BIT_INT

2013-03-14 Thread kmx
On 13.3.2013 23:14, sisyph...@optusnet.com.au wrote: -Original Message- From: kmx Hi, is anybody against turning on USE_64_BIT_INT in coming 32bit Strawberry Perl 5.18.x series ? I have done some testing with PDL guys approx a year ago on 5.16.0 (I guess Rob is also subscribed to this

Call for opinion: strawberry perl 5.18.x/32bit with USE_64_BIT_INT

2013-03-13 Thread kmx
Hi, is anybody against turning on USE_64_BIT_INT in coming 32bit Strawberry Perl 5.18.x series ? I have done some testing with PDL guys approx a year ago on 5.16.0 (I guess Rob is also subscribed to this list) and AFAIK it works. Pros: 1/ perl core 5.17.* supports building perl with USE_64

Re: Call for opinion: strawberry perl 5.18.x/32bit with USE_64_BIT_INT

2013-03-13 Thread sisyphus1
-Original Message- From: kmx Hi, is anybody against turning on USE_64_BIT_INT in coming 32bit Strawberry Perl 5.18.x series ? I have done some testing with PDL guys approx a year ago on 5.16.0 (I guess Rob is also subscribed to this list) and AFAIK it works. I've been testing it c

Call for opinion: strawberry perl 5.18.x/32bit with USE_64_BIT_INT

2013-03-13 Thread kmx
Hi, is anybody against turning on USE_64_BIT_INT in coming 32bit Strawberry Perl 5.18.x series ? I have done some testing with PDL guys approx a year ago on 5.16.0 (I guess Rob is also subscribed to this list) and AFAIK it works. Pros: 1/ perl core 5.17.* supports building perl with USE_64