[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, David Elliott wrote:
Okay, this should all be acceptable for inclusion into wine.
The .tar.gz contains the dlls/msvcrt and include/msvcrt directories.
The .diff changes the following files: Make.rules.in configure.in
dlls/Makefile.in
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 09:15:40PM -0800, lee wrote:
i'm having trouble getting wine to work right..
the setup goes okay BUT it keeps saying invalid path c:\windows.000
now i know thats odd i created the .000 on purpose for reasons i don't
recall now but thats the "valid" path...
is
Sorry for the long post, theres a few issues raised here...
On Monday 18 December 2000 9:07 am, David Elliott wrote:
I am not yet including the testsuite in programs/msvcrttest but I will
be posting that to wine-devel with an explanation shortly.
I have a test harness for crtdll/msvcrt (or
On Monday 18 December 2000 8:07 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. For preference, keep a patch path in the same manner as the wine
ftp releases, so we can maintain it without repeated downloading.
Even better would be another cvs module. I don't know where we'd host it
though. But failing
Hello all,
some people asked us about a "Wine certification" effort, i.e.
a sticker on their product that says something like "yes, it runs on Wine".
IMO we should use the official wine glass as part of that sticker.
My proposal so far is:
/
// Yes, it runs on Wine
|__/
Hi -
For anyone not subscribed to wine-patches who's interested in
building wine on non-intel architectures, I just submitted a patch that
will let you build on the powerpc, although it won't get you running
(much). Since I think this patch is likely to be rejected (based on the
fate of
Hello -
In order to get wine to compile on the ppc processor (under linuxppc),
I needed to work on the resource compiler byteorder. I found that the
simplest thing to do was to change the line:
int byteorder = WRC_BO_NATIVE;
in wrc.c to
int byteorder = WRC_BO_LITTLE;
I don't fully
Josh DuBois wrote:
I don't fully understand the ramifications of this change, though. Is
there a general feeling about how resources should be stored on
non-intel architectures? Why is there so much switching in wrc based on
byteorder? Does windows regularly use both little and
Josh DuBois wrote:
For anyone not subscribed to wine-patches who's interested in
building wine on non-intel architectures, I just submitted a patch that
will let you build on the powerpc, although it won't get you running
(much). Since I think this patch is likely to be rejected (based
I re-submitted a patch that should at least be easier to read (diffs
with context, plus whitespace differences are ignored. (I had told
emacs to do some silly untabifying when saving C-mode buffers, which
I've stopped)). Sorry about the bad format the first time :-/
If it will
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
The big question here is how do you handle the case where the library
cannot be loaded when we need it. Right now if user32 fails to load
shell32 you simply don't get the about box, but with your change
AFAICS you get a crash instead...
correct, but the point of
Francois Gouget wrote:
And don't forget to let me know if you find bugs, have suggestions
(patches) for improvement, or questions.
one thing that could be added is the number of known APIs for each reference
system (set 1). This could give an "advancement percentage" (even, if it
could be
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Eric Pouech wrote:
Francois Gouget wrote:
And don't forget to let me know if you find bugs, have suggestions
(patches) for improvement, or questions.
one thing that could be added is the number of known APIs for each reference
system (set 1). This could give an
On Tuesday 19 December 2000 3:57 am, Francois Gouget wrote:
(even, if it could be rather easy to get the figures higher, with empty
stubs)
FWIW, I have written a stub dll generator which will read a win dll, and
generate a compilable [dll].spec [dll]_main.c and [dll].h from it. I was
what about "soberly runs on Wine" ? ;-)
A+
"Robert W. Cunningham" wrote:
Is this too simple?
"Best Served With Wine"
-BobC
Andreas Mohr wrote:
--
---
Eric Pouech (http://perso.wanadoo.fr/eric.pouech/)
"The future will be better tomorrow", Vice President Dan Quayle
15 matches
Mail list logo
