huge library renaming ?

2001-02-23 Thread Andreas Mohr
Hello all, one thing that occurred to me: Shouldn't we rename *all* Wine libraries to libwineXXX ? AFAIR there have been several naming conflicts with other projects (libole, ...), and people who need to remove a previous Wine install from their system manually have a rather hard time... Any

Re: huge library renaming ?

2001-02-23 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 08:31:50PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote: Hello all, one thing that occurred to me: Shouldn't we rename *all* Wine libraries to libwineXXX ? AFAIR there have been several naming conflicts with other projects (libole, ...), and people who need to remove a previous Wine

RE: huge library renaming ?

2001-02-23 Thread Patrik Stridvall
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 08:31:50PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote: Hello all, one thing that occurred to me: Shouldn't we rename *all* Wine libraries to libwineXXX ? AFAIR there have been several naming conflicts with other projects (libole, ...), and people who need to remove a

Re: huge library renaming ?

2001-02-23 Thread Andreas Mohr
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 01:29:29PM +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote: On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 08:31:50PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote: Hello all, one thing that occurred to me: Shouldn't we rename *all* Wine libraries to libwineXXX ? AFAIR there have been several naming conflicts with

Re: huge library renaming ?

2001-02-23 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Marcus Meissner wrote: Why not put them in /usr/lib/wine/ as suggested by the FHS? That's what I've been doing for the FreeBSD port for ages. Welcome to the club! :-) Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/

Re: huge library renaming ?

2001-02-23 Thread Ove Kaaven
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Andreas Mohr wrote: AFAIR there have been several naming conflicts with other projects (libole, ...), and people who need to remove a previous Wine install from their system manually have a rather hard time... Any reason for not doing this ? I can't think of any...

IBM Websphere Studio

2001-02-23 Thread David . Goodenough
Having got Java running properly under Wine 20010216, now I return to the application that caused me to start looking at Java, Websphere Studio. I managed to get it to install with a few non-fatal messages, and it starts. It is very slow, but my first interest is to get it to work. It uses

Re: huge library renaming ?

2001-02-23 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Ove Kaaven wrote: AFAIR there have been several naming conflicts with other projects (libole, ...), and people who need to remove a previous Wine install from their system manually have a rather hard time... Any reason for doing this? I can't think of any... The

RE: huge library renaming ?

2001-02-23 Thread Patrik Stridvall
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Andreas Mohr wrote: AFAIR there have been several naming conflicts with other projects (libole, ...), and people who need to remove a previous Wine install from their system manually have a rather hard time... Any reason for not doing this ? I can't think of

RE: huge library renaming ?

2001-02-23 Thread Ove Kaaven
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Patrik Stridvall wrote: Sure Wine uses (or can be made to use rpath), but I'm not sure we want to require all Winelib applications to do the same. No, the configure script applies rpath to the winelib dlls. The wine binary itself doesn't use rpath by default. It would

Re: huge library renaming ?

2001-02-23 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Andreas Mohr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: one thing that occurred to me: Shouldn't we rename *all* Wine libraries to libwineXXX ? This was discussed already. The dlls will ultimately reside in /usr/lib/wine so there won't be any conflict; the libraries that have to be in /usr/lib already use the

Re: Perl/Wine extension for perusal

2001-02-23 Thread Eric Pouech
So, this imposes to have the test programs also (compile) and run under windows... This could even allow (from source code for example) to have 3 test caes : 1/ compiled and running under windows 2/ compiled under windows, but run with wine 3/ compiled as a winelib app The idea of

Re: Perl/Wine extension for perusal

2001-02-23 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Eric Pouech [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Do you really feel like a C compiler is less common than a perl binary under Windows ? I seriously doubt it... Anybody can install a perl binary on their machine, while nearly all Windows compilers are commercial software... well, the stubs between perl

Re: Perl/Wine extension for perusal

2001-02-23 Thread Eric Pouech
Alexandre Julliard wrote: Eric Pouech [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Do you really feel like a C compiler is less common than a perl binary under Windows ? I seriously doubt it... Anybody can install a perl binary on their machine, while nearly all Windows compilers are commercial

Re: ./dlls/libntdll.so: undefined reference to `PTHREAD_init_done'

2001-02-23 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Gerald Pfeifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm leaving for holidays very soon and have to proof-read some 60 exams before that, so I won't be able to track this down, but perhaps one of could fix the build failure seen on FreeBSD 4.2? Perhaps just some incomplete #ifdef ... #endif sequence?

Re: ./dlls/libntdll.so: undefined reference to `PTHREAD_init_done'

2001-02-23 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On 23 Feb 2001, Alexandre Julliard wrote: Perhaps just some incomplete #ifdef ... #endif sequence? Yep, here's a fix: Index: scheduler/pthread.c Yes, that fixes it. Thanks! Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/

Re: huge library renaming ?

2001-02-23 Thread admiral coeyman
Group, Sure Debian handles everything perfectly, and sure other distros do the same, but this *will* fail at the user level somewhere e.g. if they want to install the stuff themselves, and e.g. need to uninstall the mess cleanly again. (I know my newbies ;-) The main problem we'll