Re: Virtual memory under Win95

2001-04-23 Thread Uwe Bonnes
Dmitry == Dmitry Timoshkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ... Dmitry Could you (or anybody else with a Win95 machine) add the Dmitry following lines at the end of the previous test program and Dmitry report the result? This is with win98seg hMapping = 0014 p = 82D7E000

Re: Msvcrt fixes

2001-04-23 Thread Andreas Mohr
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 12:27:58AM -0700, François Gouget wrote: Btw, the Linux localtime documentation sucks. It's even worse than the MS one!!! Err, fix it ? ;-) Really, what is an Open Source programmer supposed to do when he realizes that something sucks ? Food for thought, --

Re: Msvcrt fixes

2001-04-23 Thread Michael Mauch
Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [patch for glibc manpage] I wonder where I should send it. Since I'm lazy I guess I will just send it over to Debian where it will join the 2+ years old bug reports for the manpages-dev package. (maybe I should check the source first though :-/)

Re: Msvcrt fixes

2001-04-23 Thread Francois Gouget
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Michael Mauch wrote: Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] The ctime manpage here is from 1996 (glibc-2.0.7 I guess), it came with the distribution. I don't see any glibc-2.1.3 or glibc-2.2 manpages, only texinfo/info files. Maybe they don't maintain man pages

Re: Virtual memory under Win95

2001-04-23 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Dmitry Timoshkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Perhaps applications which use assumptions about Win95 virtual memory management should be considered as broken? Or it is worth to support them? What should be considered broken is the memory management of Win95 ;-) But yes, we should probably