At 11:23 PM 01/05/2001 +0200, you wrote:
snip
I believe the potential problems that this can cause are way more important
than some claims that there are some problems with library freeing.
I've had that FreeLibrary() #if hack removed for a long time,
and I haven't see any adverse effects (not
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 06:19:26PM -0700, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Andreas Mohr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I for one would truly like to see it fixed ASAP.
If FreeLibrary() has a problem, then we need to fix it.
Running away from the problem by implementing strange hacks does no good
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 10:09:24AM +0200, gerard patel wrote:
At 11:23 PM 01/05/2001 +0200, you wrote:
snip
I believe the potential problems that this can cause are way more important
than some claims that there are some problems with library freeing.
I've had that FreeLibrary() #if hack
Bang Jun-Young wrote:
Hi,
For the last couple of weeks I spent some time doing porting Wine to
NetBSD (there used to be a port but was too out of date). After applying
patches my own, it has been successfully compiled and started running.
The most serious problem occurs, however,
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Bang Jun-Young wrote:
Hi,
For the last couple of weeks I spent some time doing porting Wine to
NetBSD (there used to be a port but was too out of date). After applying
patches my own, it has been successfully compiled and started running.
The most serious problem
gerard patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you remember, there are glibc problems with dlclose. Alexandre Julliard
said that it was not a problem because FreeLibrary was not doing anything.
So I guess that people with 'old' glibc could have now new crashes.
Actually we still cannot dlclose
Documented ? Oops, I missed completely this part.
This weekend I have browsed the wonderful Wine user manual for the
first time , since I have now a computer with a working db2html - now
I know what *is* the Wine user manual ;-)
I have not seen where this info is hiding.
well, it has been
At 02:30 PM 25/04/2001 +0200, I wrote:
At 09:30 AM 25/04/2001 +0200, I wrote:
Also several apps are not erasing parts of the screen : among others the word viewer
97
(freeware downloadable). A few other strange crashes.
Still talking to myself... I feel I'm soon one of these sad cases
gerard patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[patch snipped]
I got the following results :
Word viewer 32 bits, 16 bits, Lotus Notes (AFAICT), Statview, QuattroPro 1, and a
few old 16 bits apps I have display more or less as well as before (some crud for
WW32
that was not before, though
