I am currently in the process of implementing a stubbed version of
ctl3d.dll. For functions that return BOOL, I'm printing a fixme and
then returning TRUE. What is the convention for stubbed
implementations that return a Windows object (HBRUSH, HWND, etc)?
Thanx,
Ian
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 05:23:39PM +0300, Jukka Heinonen wrote:
+ /*
+ * FIXME: This routine will not work if it is called
+ *from 32 bit DPMI program and the program returns
+ *to protected mode while ESP or EIP is over 0x.
+ * FIXME: This
On May 10, 2002 10:21 pm, Guy L. Albertelli wrote:
Dimi
I would be very glad of help on common controls. I think common controls
is big enough to keep both of us busy. I would recommend that we be
co-owners of this part.
If we can be co-owners, by all means. I know a few of them very well,
On Saturday 11 May 2002 02:24, Dustin Navea wrote:
Hi,
Sorry I wasn't very clear - its not really a
wine-users question per se - I
want to be able to hack on Wine whilst keeping
up-to-date with the
cvs.winehq.com version and need to know how to build
it. I'm aware
wineinstall
List,
I'd like to be listed under DOS, but I'm not good enough to be in charge of
anything. Right now, I cannot even get wine to compile. ( signal 11 on
control.c )
God Bless,
--Robert 'Admiral' Coeyman
--
---
May you live as long as you wish and age but a
Hello All,
I was trying to install TCL 8.4. The install went all the way through
and said installation completed via their installer, but then the
last window to popup from the installer froze up wine.
I was then able to get these error messages from a program
called OpenVision and I do not
degs,
please post your messages when configure fails...
that will be better than only words...
cvs checkout wine
while(1) {
./configure make all install
sleep(days)
cvs update wine
}
eventually configure fails. (some way in - in
makefile generation I think). I
err:font:AddFontFileToList Unable to load font
file /c/windows/Fonts/SFMATEXT.PFM err = 2
ignore them
wine: Unhandled exception, starting debugger...
Warning: /usr/local/bin/winedbg.exe not accessible
from a configured
DOS drive
put a drive for /usr, it will leave many error
messages.
On Sat, 11 May 2002, degs wrote:
cvs checkout wine
while(1) {
./configure make all install
sleep(days)
cvs update wine
cvs update -Pd wine
(as the instructions on www.winehq.com tells you)
}
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:44:53AM -0400, admiral coeyman wrote:
List,
I'd like to be listed under DOS, but I'm not good enough to be in charge of
anything. Right now, I cannot even get wine to compile. ( signal 11 on
control.c )
Can you fetch older versions of control.c via CVS
Hello,
Ok, I have been able to get the debugger started and it is now
running, but I am a little unclear as to how I should get the
information that you, or the group, might need to see what the
problem is.
I am a little new to this part of the Wine development so please bare
with me as I learn
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 05/11/02
at 01:50 PM, Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
: What about if the physical file system is FAT, we support all of the flags
: just like Windows does.
:I guess we need a kernel with Extended Atributes (EA).
:It's in Linux 2.5, but until 2.6 is
--- degs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 11 May 2002 02:24, Dustin Navea wrote:
Hi,
Sorry I wasn't very clear - its not really a
wine-users question per se - I
want to be able to hack on Wine whilst keeping
up-to-date with the
cvs.winehq.com version and need to know
--- degs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 11 May 2002 21:30, you wrote:
try doing cvs update -RdP wine
and see if configure fails after that...
thanks
-- degs
__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
which sound cards is this meant for? i have a live
platinum 5.1, is it to be used by people who _do_ or
who _dont_ have sb cards? i must be missing the
point, but what is the need for sb emulation?
-Dustin
__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo!
--- degs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have to wait until someone removes something from
Wine cvs which would
otherwise cause configure to screw up if 'cvs update
-RdP' didn't remove it I
guess - its one of those
no-non-black-crows-disproving-the-all-crows-are-black
kind of deals :-)
--
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:51:05PM -0700, Dustin Navea wrote:
which sound cards is this meant for? i have a live
platinum 5.1, is it to be used by people who _do_ or
who _dont_ have sb cards? i must be missing the
point, but what is the need for sb emulation?
Of course it's meant to be for
--- Andreas Mohr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:51:05PM -0700, Dustin
Navea wrote:
which sound cards is this meant for? i have a
live
platinum 5.1, is it to be used by people who _do_
or
who _dont_ have sb cards? i must be missing the
point, but what is the need
On Sat, 11 May 2002, Vincent Béron wrote:
There's a bunch of APIs defined with ptr instead of str/wstr: should I
clean them up also?
Changelog:
- The definition of GetSystemWideDirectory{A,W} in kernel32.spec had
some ptr args, while they are supposed to be {str, wstr} respectively.
This
On Sat, 11 May 2002, Vincent Béron wrote:
[...]
Also, I'm not sure how to translate that code to the W version of the
function. Should the W call the A? Or reimplement the same algorithm,
with different string constants and function calls (A vs W)?
xxxA should call xxxW. Typically this is
Changelog:
- The definition of GetSystemWideDirectory{A,W} in kernel32.spec had
some ptr args, while they are supposed to be {str, wstr} respectively.
I think we should keep the ptr here...
in fact, the difference between str and ptr (in relay trace for 32 bit
functions) is that, on entry,
Ian D. Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am currently in the process of implementing a stubbed version of
ctl3d.dll. For functions that return BOOL, I'm printing a fixme and
then returning TRUE. What is the convention for stubbed
implementations that return a Windows object (HBRUSH,
On Sat, 11 May 2002, admiral coeyman wrote:
List,
I'd like to be listed under DOS, but I'm not good enough to be in charge of
anything. Right now, I cannot even get wine to compile. ( signal 11 on
control.c )
Could it be a compiler version issue? Which version of gcc are you
using?
Dustin Navea wrote:
[snip]
--- tools/wineinstall Sat May 4 13:31:24 2002
+++ tools/wineinstall.new Sat May 11 01:19:04 2002
-319,7 +319,9
# to our sucommand string
if [ -f /etc/ld.so.conf ]
then
- if [ ! grep -qs $libdir /etc/ld.so.conf ]
+ # why were there
Andreas Mohr,
I'd like to be listed under DOS, but I'm not good enough to be in charge of
anything. Right now, I cannot even get wine to compile. ( signal 11 on
control.c )
Can you fetch older versions of control.c via CVS until you find one
that doesn't bail out ?
Signal
25 matches
Mail list logo
