On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 07:11:53PM -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: WINE virus thing
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 22:33:29 +0100 (MET)
From: Marcel Partap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Dimitrie,
I am not on the mailing list for
Andreas Mohr wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 06:47:35PM +0200, Jukka Heinonen wrote:
After this patch winedos contains almost complete int31
emulation. What has not been moved to winedos is mostly
functions that require either W32S_WINE2APP or W32S_APP2WINE.
This makes me wonder whether
Hi All,
I have been a silent observer on here for some time. (about 2 years or so).
In the course of this time it has occurred to me that you are developing
WINE with the aim of allowing all M$ platform programs to run on the
_much_ more stable Linux platform.
In light of some recent news here
If you look at these files:
http://theoretic.com/template.css
and
http://theoretic.com/pngbehavior.htc
you can see how to get PNG transparency in IE. Essentially it involves
uploading the .htc file and referencing it via CSS. Ugly, but it works.
The reason this is needed is because some time
Sorry, URL slipped out of the link :(
http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,5421656%5e16123%5e%5enbv%5e,00.html
--
cheers
Gregory Hicks
Q48036388 3rd Year CQU BIT
I took a bigger challenge - study externally and long distance
begin:vcard
n:Hicks;Gregory
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
You're absolutely right.
I compiled ENTIRE wine with CFLAGS=-O0.
You know what ? Everything works, and it even speeds up games like
Quake III !!
Hmm. It work fine if you remove -O2.
I almost never compile Wine with optimization so I haven't detected
it.
OK. I will see what I can do. It
Hi
I have a program that crashes at startup. The backtrace shows only one
entry (and obviously a wrong one). What's the best way to find this error?
Is it possible that my program can write into wine's memory? It runs fine
in Windows so I don't think that there are many flaws in it (though still
On 5 Nov 2002, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Ove Kaaven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can I bring your (apparently minor) widl changes into rewind, so that I
can generate a diff from there that'll apply directly to wine?
Not sure what I changed, if it's only a couple of lines you can
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, kevin wrote:
COM error!
I have test COM On wine.
Tonight,I wrote a test program
First,I called CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_MULTITHREADED)...
Second,I called CoGetClassObject(rclsid, dwClsContext,
NULL,IID_IClassFactory, (PVOID*)pcf) and return
--- Gregory Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I have been a silent observer on here for some time. (about 2 years or so).
In the course of this time it has occurred to me that you are developing
WINE with the aim of allowing all M$ platform programs to run on the
_much_ more stable
Please don't let me distract you from your important work, but Thomas
Wickline asked me to stop in and say hello to all of you. I understand
that we are approaching the 10 year anniversary of Wine. That is a
remarkable feat. All of you should be proud to be contributing to this
effort. It
Laurent's copy protection patch, while impressive, does have a pretty
serious
copyright-related issue, which has nothing to do with the DMCA. The problem
is that his SafeDisc driver is - at least in parts - a direct translation
of a
dissassembly. Such translation means that technically
On November 6, 2002 10:27 am, Martin Wilck wrote:
- Keep old behavior as default, using new config option to change.
Can you also please update the documentation as well (man pages, etc.)?
--
Dimi.
(I'm not sure this will get through to the list, as I am not subscribed,
so I am Cc:ing you.)
You wrote:
4. Enlist some 'official' distribution maintainers
(at the minimum RedHat, Suse, Mandrake, Debian)
Please also include FreeBSD, and feel free to contact me for
FreeBSD-related issues,
Martin Wilck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+/**
+ * netbios_char (INTERNAL)
+ */
+static WCHAR netbios_char ( WCHAR wc )
+{
+static const WCHAR special[] =
What's the history of Wine?
Hmm. I actually started on something like this.
Google's groups are a great way to find info.
Some of the stuff I started on was the very early
years - 1993 - 1995. I'm sure Marcus or Alexandre
could fill in the blanks after that.
As far as Bob goes, there
Am Mit, 2002-11-06 um 16.54 schrieb Dmitry Timoshkov:
Shouldn't be sizeof(special) above divided by sizeof(WCHAR)?
Good catch, thanks.
Martin
Sure, I know that (I'm working on DPMI32 which isn't for standard mode
Windows programs), I was probably being a bit unclear about
what I was wondering about. It is quite difficult to find any information
about Win32s nowadays and everything I have found was suggesting that
Win32s was for
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 08:37:26AM -0800, Robert Amstadt wrote:
Sure, I know that (I'm working on DPMI32 which isn't for standard mode
Windows programs), I was probably being a bit unclear about
what I was wondering about. It is quite difficult to find any information
about Win32s nowadays
Am Mit, 2002-11-06 um 16.43 schrieb Dimitrie O. Paun:
Can you also please update the documentation as well (man pages, etc.)?
Ok. Btw is there any specific reason why the man pages have not been
converted to Docbook yet? I really dislike hand-editing troff.
Martin
--
Martin Wilck
Mr. Amstadt, I just was marvelling at seeing you on the list ;) and the
question happened to pop into my head, what do you think about the whole
wine relicensing ordeal, and TransGaming trying to get at the
LGPL-licensed code?
I haven't followed the situation. So, I really can't comment.
Mr. Amstadt, I just was marvelling at seeing you on the list ;) and the
question happened to pop into my head, what do you think about the whole wine
relicensing ordeal, and TransGaming trying to get at the LGPL-licensed code?
-Dustin Navea
WebHosting Tech Support, RackShack.net Internet Services
On November 6, 2002 11:47 am, Andreas Mohr wrote:
If anyone needs that, I guess I could easily dig up the mail from Ulrich
Weigand that explained the miracles accomplished at that time in great
detail. (it was not much more other than pure luck that we were able to do
what we did with Win32s
On November 6, 2002 11:55 am, Martin Wilck wrote:
Ok. Btw is there any specific reason why the man pages have not been
converted to Docbook yet? I really dislike hand-editing troff.
I had a similar reaction (never touched troff before), but you're
better off than trying to install the docbook
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:55:20PM +0100, Martin Wilck wrote:
Am Mit, 2002-11-06 um 16.43 schrieb Dimitrie O. Paun:
Can you also please update the documentation as well (man pages, etc.)?
Ok. Btw is there any specific reason why the man pages have not been
converted to Docbook yet? I
Am Mit, 2002-11-06 um 18.19 schrieb Dimitrie O. Paun:
I had a similar reaction (never touched troff before), but you're
better off than trying to install the docbook tools :)
I guess that nobody did it (you have to set up the .sgml - troff
conversion as well).
That's a no-brainer, really,
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 12:12:45PM -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On November 6, 2002 11:47 am, Andreas Mohr wrote:
If anyone needs that, I guess I could easily dig up the mail from Ulrich
Weigand that explained the miracles accomplished at that time in great
detail. (it was not much more
On November 6, 2002 01:19 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote:
What's relevant is whether we still need to be able to use a real Win32s
subsystem or not (and whether it's even still possible !).
This is a hacky subsystem, and the associated code is hard to understand,
and maintain. I see no reason to
On November 6, 2002 04:10 am, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
You wrote:
4. Enlist some 'official' distribution maintainers
(at the minimum RedHat, Suse, Mandrake, Debian)
Please also include FreeBSD, and feel free to contact me for
FreeBSD-related issues, especially concerning this kind of
Ove Kaaven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You added enum attr_type and changed stuff to use that instead of the
bison tokens from y.tab.h (no real idea why). Probably around 30 lines.
I think it was to fix a problem with header dependencies. Sure, you
can merge that into rewind.
Well, I try to do
Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alexandre, will you accept a patch removing that stuff?
Certainly. I don't mind keeping it around as long as it doesn't impact
anything, but if it gets in the way let's just kill that stuff.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On November 6, 2002 01:40 pm, Marcus Meissner wrote:
+
+FIXME((%p, %ld, %d, %d, %d, %p, %p, %p)\n,
+ pvInstance, oVft, cc, vtReturn, cActuals, prgvt, prgpvarg, pvargResult +
);
Why is this one a FIXME, and not a TRACE?
[snip]
+/* FIXME: Must handle pvargResult. How? */
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 10:10:59AM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
You wrote:
4. Enlist some 'official' distribution maintainers
(at the minimum RedHat, Suse, Mandrake, Debian)
...
Many contributors (including myself) have been providing patches to
improve portability or support
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 01:53:40PM -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On November 6, 2002 01:40 pm, Marcus Meissner wrote:
+
+FIXME((%p, %ld, %d, %d, %d, %p, %p, %p)\n,
+ pvInstance, oVft, cc, vtReturn, cActuals, prgvt, prgpvarg, pvargResult +
);
Why is this one a FIXME, and
On November 6, 2002 12:40 pm, Martin Wilck wrote:
The converted man pages could be part of CVS (as some other
autogenerated files are) so that users wouldn't be required to have
docbook in order to generate the manual pages.
We have to have the troff stuff in CVS, we can't require users
to
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 01:32:07PM -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On November 6, 2002 01:19 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote:
What's relevant is whether we still need to be able to use a real Win32s
subsystem or not (and whether it's even still possible !).
This is a hacky subsystem, and the
On November 6, 2002 02:24 pm, Andreas Mohr wrote:
(you know how harsh and proficient I can be at flaming back, so better
don't challenge me ;-)))
So you're asserting your exclusive right to be harsh? :)
And yes, I certainly agree on removing it in case it is a problem
(unless it's really
On November 6, 2002 02:38 pm, Patrik Stridvall wrote:
Fixed mismatches between the Wine headers and the Microsoft headers.
Patrick, what's the status of compiling stuff on Windows?
The tests compiles fine (except for ntdll if the Microsoft
headers are used). Some fails on Windows when
On November 6, 2002 02:38 pm, Patrik Stridvall wrote:
Fixed mismatches between the Wine headers and the Microsoft headers.
Patrick, what's the status of compiling stuff on Windows?
--
Dimi.
Enrico Horn a écrit :
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 20:29, Eric Pouech wrote:
RFE:
Actually I am not interested in debug msgs after the debugger started.
Could there be an option that an debugger start turns off debug msgs.
set - all
the debugger is called on an unhandled
On Wednesday 06 November 2002 12:50 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Ove Kaaven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You added enum attr_type and changed stuff to use that instead of
the bison tokens from y.tab.h (no real idea why). Probably around
30 lines.
I think it was to fix a problem with header
--- Patrik Stridvall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On November 6, 2002 02:38 pm, Patrik Stridvall wrote:
Fixed mismatches between the Wine headers and the Microsoft headers.
Patrick, what's the status of compiling stuff on Windows?
Under Mingw most of the dlls except the lower level ones
This is based upon the Wine 0.8 TODO v0.2 send earlier to the list.
It is important to get a comprehensive list of what needs to be done,
in order to have a successful 0.9 release. This includes all things
Wine-related, not only the code.
I can not do it alone -- I need your input.
Before I
bigdiff.new:
generates a list of files that are only in one tree or the other.
Interesting, using 8-bit encoding, it wraps even as an enclosure.
Here's another try...
--
gmt
Do you frequently think there ought to be a law...?
Afraid that people you /don't like/ have too much FREEDOM?
Robert Amstadt wrote:
Please don't let me distract you from your important work, but Thomas
Wickline asked me to stop in and say hello to all of you.
Hello Bob,
I'm glad to see you made it back :)
Best Wishes
Thomas Wickline
-
Bob Amstadt
http://www.amstadt.com/~bob
[EMAIL
One more bug:
FIXME still reports the CF_ENABLETEMPLATE flag as non-supported.
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
ChangeLog:
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Todo:
* Implement support for the scripts selection.
o Enum the scripts the font supports, and display the list
--- Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[-snip-]
5. Create nice page with apps that run virtually flawless [IN PROGRESS]
They should not require MS dlls, tricks, etc. to run
- worker: Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Add me on here, I will do some app testing from various sites...
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
This is based upon the Wine 0.8 TODO v0.2 send earlier to the list.
It is important to get a comprehensive list of what needs to be done,
in order to have a successful 0.9 release. This includes all things
Wine-related, not only the code.
A suggestion... As far as I
Dimitry Timoshkov wrote:
On November 6, 2002 11:47 am, Andreas Mohr wrote:
If anyone needs that, I guess I could easily dig up the mail from Ulrich
Weigand that explained the miracles accomplished at that time in great
detail. (it was not much more other than pure luck that we were able
El mié, 06 de nov de 2002, a las 13:16, Dustin Navea escribio:
--- Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[-snip-]
5. Create nice page with apps that run virtually flawless [IN PROGRESS]
They should not require MS dlls, tricks, etc. to run
- worker: Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here are a few early posts:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=1993Jul2.173648.3202%40amscons.com
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Amstadt)
Subject: Re: Impressions of WABI/Univel vs Linux
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Amstadt
On Wednesday 06 November 2002 21:25, you wrote:
Enrico Horn a écrit :
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 20:29, Eric Pouech wrote:
RFE:
Actually I am not interested in debug msgs after the debugger
started. Could there be an option that an debugger start turns off
debug msgs.
set
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 01:25:25PM -0800, Duane Clark wrote:
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
This is based upon the Wine 0.8 TODO v0.2 send earlier to the list.
It is important to get a comprehensive list of what needs to be done,
in order to have a successful 0.9 release. This includes all things
On November 6, 2002 04:58 pm, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Dimitry Timoshkov wrote:
^
Where did you come up with this? I wrote it... :)
--
Dimi.
Excuse me if I feel scared, but is this Appdb or something else ??
Now the question is:
a) One page for all the applications.
b) A index page with a table:
| Name| Version | Status |
On November 6, 2002 04:58 pm, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Dimitry Timoshkov wrote:
^
Where did you come up with this? I wrote it... :)
Argh. I should configure my mailer correctly so that
I don't need to hand-edit this :-/ Sorry ...
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
[EMAIL
Hi,
I was going over the notepad code, and it is implemented using richedit.
My question is - why? There is no functionality there that is not also
available through the usual Edit control. The Windows notepad is
notoriously implemented via the edit control. Is there a special reason
why our
I'm trying to revamp notepad a little. In particular, I'm trying to add
the select font option to it. This is problematic under the RICHEDIT
control, as each character there can, potentially, have it's own font.
In addition to that, I see such programs as an important tool to unit
test various
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was going over the notepad code, and it is implemented using richedit.
My question is - why? There is no functionality there that is not also
available through the usual Edit control. The Windows notepad is
notoriously implemented via the edit
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was going over the notepad code, and it is implemented using richedit.
My question is - why? There is no functionality there that is not also
available through the usual Edit control. The Windows notepad is
notoriously
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to revamp notepad a little. In particular, I'm trying to add
the select font option to it. This is problematic under the RICHEDIT
control, as each character there can, potentially, have it's own font.
In addition to that, I see such
On Wednesday 06 Nov 2002 11:02 pm, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I was going over the notepad code, and it is implemented using
richedit. My question is - why? There is no functionality there that is
not also available through the usual Edit control. The Windows notepad
is notoriously implemented via
Folks,
This time in HTML Technicolor, at:
http://www.dssd.ca/Wine-0.9-TODO.html
Please take a look, and let me know if you think
anything needs to change. If you are listed there
on a task, a status update would be more than
appreciated. If you feel like working on something,
I would
63 matches
Mail list logo
