On Thursday 07 November 2002 3:44 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
We're still missing one. Any takers?
Yes, I'd really like to do that. What do I have to do to join up?
On Thursday 07 November 2002 6:59 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On November 7, 2002 01:55 pm, Steve Langasek wrote:
What do you mean by Debian maintainer, precisely? The most recent wine
package in Debian is version 0.0.20021007-1, uploaded October 20 by Ove
Kaaven. Has Ove indicated that
Ove Kaaven wrote:
If you want, you or someone else could help by checking the Debian bugs on
the package though
Ok sounds good. Did you want me to just contact you with a list of bugs you
can close out, or should I apply to become a Debian maintainer so that I can
close them out?
On Friday
On Thursday 31 October 2002 1:53 am, Matthew Bloch wrote:
Okay, but presumably it's easier (as in not impossible!) for me to debug a
program with GDB if I'm using a elf binary as opposed to a PE binary, which
is mostly my object here.
gdb does have support for PEs (since there are Windows
On Friday 14 Jun 2002 6:20 pm, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
some application (xilinx webpack) dind't find it's initialisation file when
started in the debugger (winedbg bin/nt/webpack.exe versus wine
bin/nt/exepack started in l:/xilinx). As trap there is also a directory
l:/xilinx/xilinx. The starting
On Saturday 01 Jun 2002 5:56 pm, Michael Cardenas wrote:
This was discussed at wineconf, well, getting gdb to work with wine was
discussed at wineconf because of the huge value in having a graphical
front end for debugging.
Ont major problem is that gdb doesn't understand wine's handling of
On Wednesday 22 May 2002 10:39 am, Tijs van Bakel wrote:
Either I could work on winedbg to match
gdb's features, or I could try to make gdb understand Wine better.
Given the amount of useful frontends for gdb, it seems wiser to go for
the second option.
gdb can debug Windows programs
I posted a utility to convert between unix and DOS paths the other day,
something like cygwin's cygpath, and it didn't get applied.
So I was wondering why? Was it not thought to be useful or was there
semething wrong that I can fix?
MIke
The 'configure' band still had broken long lines, and perhaps I
shouldn't have had it there anyway since it can be generated, so I've
just removed it.
ChangeLog:
* configure, configure.ac, Makefile.in, schedule/process.c
programs/Makefile.in, programs/winepath/.cvsignore
On Wednesday 24 Apr 2002 7:51 pm, you wrote:
--- Michael Wetherell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes I know cygpath, winepath is intended to be a
kind of Wine version of the
same thing.
The programs aren't interchangeable though, cygpath
knows about Cygwin's
mount points while
10 matches
Mail list logo
