On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 05:35:20PM +0100, Iris Fischer wrote:
Hi there,
I found your benchmark... it wasnt exactly what I was looking for, but do you maybe
have an idea on how I can find information about the demand for wine in Canada, or
North America on the internet?
Im writing my thesis
Andreas Mohr wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 05:35:20PM +0100, Iris Fischer wrote:
Hi there,
I found your benchmark... it wasnt exactly what I was looking for, but do you
maybe have an idea on how I can find information about the demand for wine in Canada,
or North America on the
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:32:40PM +, Eric Pouech wrote:
Andreas Mohr wrote:
I just *had* to approve this one.
It's just way too funny :-)
"Wine benchmark"... ROTFD.
(ROTF drunkenly)
hmmm I ROTFL:ed mainly because of "German Wine"... isn't that on oxymoron ?
(sorry Andi, I
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Andreas Mohr wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:32:40PM +, Eric Pouech wrote:
Andreas Mohr wrote:
I just *had* to approve this one.
It's just way too funny :-)
"Wine benchmark"... ROTFD.
(ROTF drunkenly)
hmmm I ROTFL:ed mainly because of "German
On a side note, wasn't this the vintage of benchmark
that lent itself to fudging by the video card
vendors? That is, wasn't there a big stink
about video drivers being written to these
tests.
Andreas, any chance you could rerun this
against a 'Standard VGA' driver and see if the
numbers change?
* Is optimizing the code based on these results really that good for
real life performance for 16bit applications.
One thing that is important to note is that Win16 is slower than Win32
because the Win16 API almost always converts it paramters and calls
the corresponding Win32 API.
This
Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* This is a 16bit benchmark but nowadays most applications are 32bits.
To what extent do these results reflect the performance we would get
with a 32bit application?
We must definitely use a 32-bit benchmark. Optimizing on the basis of
a 16-bit
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Patrik Stridvall wrote:
* Is optimizing the code based on these results really that good for
real life performance for 16bit applications.
One thing that is important to note is that Win16 is slower than Win32
because the Win16 API almost always converts it
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Patrik Stridvall wrote:
[...]
* This is a 16bit benchmark but nowadays most applications
are 32bits.
To what extent do these results reflect the performance we would get
with a 32bit application?
To a very large extent the same I think, especially for slow
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Patrik Stridvall wrote:
[...]
* This is a 16bit benchmark but nowadays most applications
are 32bits.
To what extent do these results reflect the performance
we would get
with a 32bit application?
To a very large extent the same I think, especially for
Hi,
I wanted to do it since Andreas posted it. I simply never got the
time. Well, here it is, finally. I reformatted the benchmark results so
that they are sorted on the ratio windows score/wine score. The idea
being that it makes it clearer where are our weak points.
Well, the
11 matches
Mail list logo
