Jeremy White wrote:
With COM, the other issue is that someone needs to look at the MS patents
in this area. Mainsoft is telling people that they can't use Wine to
port COM code, because Microsoft holds patents on some of the Vtable
logic used in COM (and no, I don't have any more detail than
Dan Kegel wrote:
Jeremy White wrote:
With COM, the other issue is that someone needs to look at the MS patents
in this area. Mainsoft is telling people that they can't use Wine to
port COM code, because Microsoft holds patents on some of the Vtable
logic used in COM (and no, I don't
Jeremy White wrote:
This getes me back to the other part of the question, is anyone currently
working on this? I know people at CodeWeavers supposedly were working on
getting the various mutations of InstallShield working, this error seems
to be pretty common across all InstallSheild v6
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:47:01PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
http://freedce.sourceforge.net/ is an open source project to implement COM.
It's been around quite some time, and started off from the same
DCE sources that Microsoft based its stuff on.
(See also http://linas.org/linux/corba.html )
As for doing the 10k+ lines of coding myself, I have experience in
(de)marshalling and network coding, spent many years doing it, it's more a
matter of available time and learning the com wire protocols, neither of which
are currently available to me. Here's to hoping someone is already
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:47:01PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
Jeremy White wrote:
This getes me back to the other part of the question, is anyone currently
working on this? I know people at CodeWeavers supposedly were working on
getting the various mutations of InstallShield working, this
From: Jeremy White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For local marshalling we could use our own protocol and even our own way
of ipc if we don't try to mix processes with native and wine com-dll's. It
com server is only interested in the result ;-). And isn't the com
marshalling
This getes me back to the other part of the question, is anyone currently
working on this? I know people at CodeWeavers supposedly were working on
getting the various mutations of InstallShield working, this error seems
to be pretty common across all InstallSheild v6 based installers I've
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Gavriel State wrote:
Mike Bond wrote:
This getes me back to the other part of the question, is anyone currently
working on this? I know people at CodeWeavers supposedly were working on
getting the various mutations of InstallShield working, this error seems
to
Mike Bond wrote:
This getes me back to the other part of the question, is anyone currently
working on this? I know people at CodeWeavers supposedly were working on
getting the various mutations of InstallShield working, this error seems
to be pretty common across all InstallSheild v6 based
My question, is anyone currently working on implementing CLSCTX_LOCAL_SERVER
in compobj.c:CoGetClassObject, or have plans to work on this in the near
future? If not, I may go back to trying to figure out what is happening
with the 'native' configuration.
This will require a lot
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 10:42:24AM -0400, Mike Bond wrote:
Quick brief, I've been lurking for quite some time around WineHQ and the
wine project, but don't really have time for putting a lot of devel into
it. It seems wine is finally getting close enough to working for most
things that I can
12 matches
Mail list logo
