On Saturday 22 March 2003 12:15 pm, Paul McNett wrote:
> However, hosting the database on Linux, accessed by Linux/Wine directly
> at /tmp/db.dbf and by Windows over samba, the behavior is not correct.
> It seems that instead of a range lock, a complete file lock is
> propogated, and it also seem
On Friday 21 March 2003 09:21 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> It's quite possible that there are still bugs in the implementation.
> One thing to test would be with two clients running on the same
> machine, so that they use the same wineserver; this way all locking
> will be done internally witho
, March 21, 2003 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: LockFile() and UnlockFile() are working
> Hi John K. Hohm,
>
> On Friday 21 March 2003 12:15 pm, John K. Hohm wrote:
>
> > > This resolution will make a ton of business apps based
on desktop
> > > database software that much closer
Paul McNett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry for being thick (I'm sure this is a stupid question). Is there a way
> I can test on the same machine with two different wineservers (can I have
> more than one wineserver running on the same machine)? If possible, this
> would force Unix locks,
On Friday 21 March 2003 09:21 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> It's quite possible that there are still bugs in the implementation.
> One thing to test would be with two clients running on the same
> machine, so that they use the same wineserver;
This seems to work correctly and consistently, alt
Paul McNett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So... my question to those that understand this stuff much better than I
> do... what is still missing? Is it ReadFile() that was mentioned by John
> K. Hohm earlier?
It's quite possible that there are still bugs in the implementation.
One thing to tes
On Friday 21 March 2003 05:52 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Yes, the problem is that the smbfs Linux filesystem doesn't propagate
> locks. So you have to make sure that Wine is accessing the files
> through NFS, not through smbfs. As long as the server is a Linux
> machine this shouldn't be a pr
Paul McNett wrote:
> On Friday 21 March 2003 05:07 pm, Bill Medland wrote:
>
>
>> The Samba server does the right thing, so host the file on unix/linux.
>
>
> Ok, let me get this straight. If I host the file on Linux using Samba, and
> connect to it using mixed Windows and Linux/Wine clients, the
Paul McNett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So... where is the failing exactly? Windows SMB clients connecting to
> Windows SMB servers respect locks just fine. Windows SMB clients
> connecting to Linux Samba shares respect locks just fine (I've been doing
> this for years). Is the problem wit
On Friday 21 March 2003 04:59 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Actually if you mount with the right options and set the right
> permissions on the file, mandatory locking should work. That's the
> theory though, I haven't tested it...
Ok I'll test this out. Anyone know what options I need to moun
On Friday 21 March 2003 05:07 pm, Bill Medland wrote:
> The Samba server does the right thing, so host the file on unix/linux.
Ok, let me get this straight. If I host the file on Linux using Samba, and
connect to it using mixed Windows and Linux/Wine clients, the locking
should be respected al
On March 21, 2003 04:59 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Paul McNett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I just confirmed... while locking seems to work if two instances of
> > Visual Foxpro are running on Wine on the same machine, it DOES NOT work
> > over the network. I had one instance on Wine and o
Paul McNett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just confirmed... while locking seems to work if two instances of Visual
> Foxpro are running on Wine on the same machine, it DOES NOT work over the
> network. I had one instance on Wine and one instance on WinNT. Both
> instances were interacting w
On March 19, 2003 03:30 pm, Tony Lambregts wrote:
> Paul McNett wrote:
> > As of yesterday, 3/18/2003, LockFile() and UnlockFile() are now
> > implemented, and seem to be working perfectly on my end, testing with the
> > Visual FoxPro native functions of flock(), rlock(), and unlock().
> >
> > This
On March 21, 2003 04:34 pm, Paul McNett wrote:
> Hi John K. Hohm,
>
> On Friday 21 March 2003 12:15 pm, John K. Hohm wrote:
> > > This resolution will make a ton of business apps based on desktop
> > > database software that much closer to working.
snip
> I just confirmed... while locking seems t
Hi John K. Hohm,
On Friday 21 March 2003 12:15 pm, John K. Hohm wrote:
> > This resolution will make a ton of business apps based on desktop
> > database software that much closer to working.
> I'm not so sure. I expect most database software depends on the
> mandatory nature of LockFile(), i.
> This resolution will make a ton of business apps based on desktop database
> software that much closer to working.
I'm not so sure. I expect most database software depends on the mandatory
nature of LockFile(), i.e. that a ReadFile() or WriteFile() from another
process on a locked region fai
Fabian Cenedese wrote:
Yeah when I saw that I let out a loud WOOHOO, My wife asked me what it was
about,.so I had to explain. This is BIG. It seemed to me that there should
have been a parade and fireworks involved with this announcement. Oh well...
It's still cool... Thanks Alexandre.
For those
Mike Hearn wrote:
Yeah when I saw that I let out a loud WOOHOO, My wife asked me what it was
about,.so I had to explain. This is BIG. It seemed to me that there should
have been a parade and fireworks involved with this announcement. Oh well...
It's still cool... Thanks Alexandre.
For those wh
On Thursday 20 March 2003 01:25 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
> > Yeah when I saw that I let out a loud WOOHOO, My wife asked me what it
> > was about,.so I had to explain. This is BIG. It seemed to me that there
> > should have been a parade and fireworks involved with this
> > announcement. Oh well... I
You have to have this in order to credibly support Microsoft Access...
Cheers,
Jer
Mike Hearn wrote:
Yeah when I saw that I let out a loud WOOHOO, My wife asked me what it was
about,.so I had to explain. This is BIG. It seemed to me that there should
have been a parade and fireworks involved w
>> Yeah when I saw that I let out a loud WOOHOO, My wife asked me what it was
>> about,.so I had to explain. This is BIG. It seemed to me that there should
>> have been a parade and fireworks involved with this announcement. Oh well...
>> It's still cool... Thanks Alexandre.
>
>For those who ha
> Yeah when I saw that I let out a loud WOOHOO, My wife asked me what it was
> about,.so I had to explain. This is BIG. It seemed to me that there should
> have been a parade and fireworks involved with this announcement. Oh well...
> It's still cool... Thanks Alexandre.
For those who haven't f
Paul McNett wrote:
As of yesterday, 3/18/2003, LockFile() and UnlockFile() are now implemented,
and seem to be working perfectly on my end, testing with the Visual FoxPro
native functions of flock(), rlock(), and unlock().
This resolution will make a ton of business apps based on desktop databas
As of yesterday, 3/18/2003, LockFile() and UnlockFile() are now implemented,
and seem to be working perfectly on my end, testing with the Visual FoxPro
native functions of flock(), rlock(), and unlock().
This resolution will make a ton of business apps based on desktop database
software that mu
25 matches
Mail list logo
