Re: PATCH: accept-deferred.diff (5 in series)

2002-04-18 Thread Martin Wilck
On 17 Apr 2002, Alexandre Julliard wrote: Martin Wilck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: PATCH: accept-deferred.diff If a connection request is deferred in a call to WSAAccept(), a subsequent accept()/WSAAccept() call must return the previously deferred connection rather than a new one. OK

Re: PATCH: accept-deferred.diff (5 in series)

2002-04-17 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Martin Wilck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: PATCH: accept-deferred.diff If a connection request is deferred in a call to WSAAccept(), a subsequent accept()/WSAAccept() call must return the previously deferred connection rather than a new one. You cannot store a handle to the deferred socket in

Re: PATCH: accept-deferred.diff (5 in series)

2002-04-15 Thread Martin Wilck
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: +if ( lpCallerData || lpCalleeData || lpSQOS || lpGQOS ) +WARN (unsupported parameters!); Shouldn't this be a FIXME instead? I don't think so - there is little to fix on the part of wine. AFAICS the Linux network

Re: PATCH: accept-deferred.diff (5 in series)

2002-04-15 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On April 15, 2002 09:38 am, Martin Wilck wrote: On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: +if ( lpCallerData || lpCalleeData || lpSQOS || lpGQOS ) +WARN (unsupported parameters!); Shouldn't this be a FIXME instead? I don't think so - there is little

PATCH: accept-deferred.diff (5 in series)

2002-04-12 Thread Martin Wilck
PATCH: accept-deferred.diff If a connection request is deferred in a call to WSAAccept(), a subsequent accept()/WSAAccept() call must return the previously deferred connection rather than a new one. The current CVS implementation of WSAAccept is wrong in this respect. This patch fixes this.

Re: PATCH: accept-deferred.diff (5 in series)

2002-04-12 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On April 12, 2002 11:20 am, Martin Wilck wrote: /*** + * WSAConnect (WS2_32.30) + */ +int WINAPI WSAConnect ( SOCKET s, const struct WS_sockaddr* name, int namelen, +LPWSABUF