On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
[...]
I disagree, as far as I'm concerned they are definitely regression
tests. If we only wanted to check conformance then it would be OK for
tests to fail everywhere we are not compatible; it's because the tests
must be usable to find
Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Jon Griffiths wrote:
[...]
Note that a regression is something that used to work, and now
doesn't. So any regression testing should only report failures for
tests that used to work and now don't. New tests that fail, or those
Jon Griffiths [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any problems with this one?
You said yourself that the some of the tests are currently failing;
I cannot commit tests that fail, that would make the regression test
suite useless.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alexandre == Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alexandre Jon Griffiths [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any problems with this one?
Alexandre You said yourself that the some of the tests are currently
Alexandre failing; I cannot commit tests that fail, that would make the
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Jon Griffiths wrote:
[...]
Note that a regression is something that used to work, and now
doesn't. So any regression testing should only report failures for
tests that used to work and now don't. New tests that fail, or those
that have never succeeded, _aren't_
