Re: New EXE

2003-09-01 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On August 30, 2003 04:16 pm, Jakob Eriksson wrote: Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: -- We should look for and report the exact version number of the OS. Now that we have a C program, it should not be difficult. == Tests prepared

Re: New EXE

2003-09-01 Thread Vincent Béron
Le dim 31/08/2003 à 19:01, Dimitrie O. Paun a écrit : On August 30, 2003 04:16 pm, Jakob Eriksson wrote: Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: -- We should look for and report the exact version number of the OS. Now that we have a C program, it should not be difficult.

Re: New EXE

2003-09-01 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On August 31, 2003 07:18 pm, Vincent Béron wrote: (And why haven't you installed SP3 yet? You've read the EULA for it? :)) Nah, I'm just lazy :) I don't use Windows much... In other words, the stuff returned by GetVersionEx():

Re: New EXE

2003-09-01 Thread Ivan Leo Murray-Smith
Yes, it would be nice to have more frequent releases, but we would have trouble labeling them...unless we stick to the build date. But in that case, we have to have a well understood convention on what MMDD means in terms of time, and we have to stick to it (well, the person building this

Re: New EXE

2003-09-01 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On August 31, 2003 07:52 pm, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote: What about an automatic build? Well, someone still has to donate the box, look up for it, upload the file to SF, etc. In other words, we need a volunteer that will do this regularly. If he can automate his task, the better, but that's his

Re: New EXE

2003-09-01 Thread Jakob Eriksson
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: On August 30, 2003 04:16 pm, Jakob Eriksson wrote: Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: -- We should look for and report the exact version number of the OS. Now that we have a C program, it should not be difficult. ==

Re: New EXE

2003-08-31 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Jakob Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://vmlinux.org/jakov/Wine/regrtest.exe How could you make it this small? 400 kB vs. 2.9 MB, that is, the tenth of mine! It makes a good difference in download. Archive: tests.zip (2.9 MB) Length Date TimeName

Re: New EXE

2003-08-31 Thread Jakob Eriksson
Ferenc Wagner wrote: Jakob Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://vmlinux.org/jakov/Wine/regrtest.exe How could you make it this small? 400 kB vs. 2.9 MB, that is, the tenth of mine! It makes a good difference in download. First all tests are stripped from symbols. I guess you

Re: New EXE

2003-08-30 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On August 30, 2003 01:40 pm, Jakob Eriksson wrote: http://vmlinux.org/jakov/Wine/regrtest.exe Very nice! I already submitted some results :) Some comments: -- I have Win2k here, and the comctl32 test bombed because it could not find DPA_Create (why?!?) -- We should look for and report

Re: New EXE

2003-08-30 Thread Steven Edwards
--- Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Very nice! I already submitted some results :) Some comments: -- I have Win2k here, and the comctl32 test bombed because it could not find DPA_Create (why?!?) DPA_Create is exported by ordinal on windows not by name. This is causing problems

Re: New EXE

2003-08-30 Thread Jakob Eriksson
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote: -- We should look for and report the exact version number of the OS. Now that we have a C program, it should not be difficult. == Tests prepared Aug 30 2003 Operating system version: 5.0 Service Pack 2