Hi,
Just two things for those thinking about khtml:
1) The kdebindings package contains C-language bindings for khtml
(kde_HTML*), so C++ wouldn't be a requirement for calling khtml
(this does not affect the qt-replacement api of course).
yes, as qtc in kdebindings is for qt :)
2) There is a
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Just two things for those thinking about khtml:
1) The kdebindings package contains C-language bindings for khtml
(kde_HTML*), so C++ wouldn't be a requirement for calling khtml
(this does not affect the qt-replacement api of course).
yes, as qtc in
What's the use of win32 port of the GPL version of QT for wine? We don't want
wine to depend on Qt, if we wanted this we could just use the normal Unix
version of Qt.
The khtml-win32 project is much more usefull for wine. That project is
actually porting the qt wrapper Apple made for use in
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Just two things for those thinking about khtml:
1) The kdebindings package contains C-language bindings for khtml
(kde_HTML*), so C++ wouldn't be a requirement for calling khtml
(this does not affect the qt-replacement api of course).
yes, as qtc in
Hi
What's the use of win32 port of the GPL version of QT for wine? We don't want
wine to depend on Qt, if we wanted this we could just use the normal Unix
version of Qt.
i totaly agree with you :)
I don't see any need for porting Qt to windows
The khtml-win32 project is much more usefull for
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not just port the GPL version of Qt to Windows? The kde-cygwin project is
doing that right
...
I don't think it's a good idea :(
Now, we only need a few classes and code for porting KWQ to windows specific code
(and more
platform optimised than Qt).
While
--- Adam Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not just port the GPL version of Qt to Windows? The kde-cygwin project is
doing that
And, i don't like the port idea, because trolltech use Qt under windows as main
product, and
porting the GPL version to windows
De: Adam Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sujet: Re: Re: Some more thoughts on khtml
A: Adam Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copie à: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 06:28:09 -0800 (PST)
--- Adam Treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not just port the GPL
they arent needed after the compilation.
yes, i know
but last time i saw they have partially used own compat librairies
(who use native windows calls)
=
Sylvain Petreolle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fight against Spam ! http://www.euro.cauce.org/en/index.html
ICQ #170597259
Don't think you are.
Just two things for those thinking about khtml:
1) The kdebindings package contains C-language bindings for khtml
(kde_HTML*), so C++ wouldn't be a requirement for calling khtml
(this does not affect the qt-replacement api of course).
2) There is a project to port KWC to win32: KHTML Win32
10 matches
Mail list logo