Suggested fix from one of our gcc people...
-- Forwarded message --
Date: 03 Jan 2001 09:45:47 -0200
From: Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Test case for GCC macro expansion (fwd)
On Jan 3, 2001, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On 2 Jan 2001, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's the testcase I wrote:
#define GetObject You cannot use GetObject in this context
#define ICOM_FN(xfn)fn ## xfn
#define DECLARE1(xfn)void ICOM_FN(xfn) (void);
#define
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, James Abbatiello wrote:
Francois Gouget wrote:
Here's the testcase I wrote:
#define GetObject You cannot use GetObject in this context
#define ICOM_FN(xfn)fn ## xfn
#define DECLARE1(xfn)void ICOM_FN(xfn) (void);
#define DECLARE2(xfn)
Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So if we undef GetObject and GetClassInfo (plus potentially others in
the future), we could remove the 'fn' prefix but it would take work to
update the code.
It's a bit more work, but I think the result would be cleaner than
duplicating all the
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's the testcase I wrote:
#define GetObject You cannot use GetObject in this context
#define ICOM_FN(xfn)fn ## xfn
#define DECLARE1(xfn)void ICOM_FN(xfn) (void);
#define DECLARE2(xfn)void
Attached is a simple .c file (not even a program, intended for input for the
preprocessor) and the output when run with the processors from the latest
RH7 errata GCC 2.96 and the RH7 KGCC 2.91.66 (egcs 1.1.2). I included the
output from stderr of the newer preprocessor as well.
This should be a
This should be a suitable simple testcase for a preprocessor.
Maybe it
would be good to see the results on other C preprocessors
like Solaris C so
that we can get a good idea if gcc should continue to support
this even
though I don't think it is specifically mentioned in any C
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, David Elliott wrote:
Attached is a simple .c file (not even a program, intended for input for the
preprocessor) and the output when run with the processors from the latest
RH7 errata GCC 2.96 and the RH7 KGCC 2.91.66 (egcs 1.1.2). I included the
output from stderr of the
Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's the testcase I wrote:
#define GetObject You cannot use GetObject in this context
#define ICOM_FN(xfn)fn ## xfn
#define DECLARE1(xfn)void ICOM_FN(xfn) (void);
#define DECLARE2(xfn)void ICOM_FN(##xfn) (void);
If the only
