Re: The conformance tests need you!

2002-12-04 Thread Martin Wilck
Hi Francois, You may have seen that Alexandre applied my patch, so the winsock test issue appears to be fixed. I inserted an #ifdef _WIN32 clause at the top to adjust includes to run with VC++. I wonder if this should be done for all test programs to avoid the editing hassle. The Running tests

Re: The conformance tests need you!

2002-12-04 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On December 4, 2002 04:35 am, Martin Wilck wrote: I guess for newbies it will be pretty much impossible to figure this out. Or is there a really simple way that I just missed? This is why I think we need someone to build the tests, and make them available for people to run on Windows. Even if

Re: The conformance tests need you!

2002-12-02 Thread Martin Wilck
Am Mon, 2002-12-02 um 19.12 schrieb Francois Gouget: Am Sam, 2002-11-30 um 04.02 schrieb Francois Gouget: Come on people, we can do better. Send fixes to wine-patches, and send me emails to so that I update this table. I'll have a look at the winsock stuff. Thanks :-) I am

Re: The conformance tests need you!

2002-12-02 Thread Francois Gouget
On 2 Dec 2002, Martin Wilck wrote: [...] I am currently having trouble with running stuff natively on Windows. Can anybody run the winsock test with verbose output (trace enabled) on Windows NT and send me the result ? Here goes: sock.c:686: STARTING TEST 0 sock.c:327:simple_server

The conformance tests need you!

2002-11-29 Thread Francois Gouget
Hi, I have been running the Wine conformance tests on Windows 95 and NT4. The results are pretty bad. 24 tests out of 32 have failures in one or more of these two platforms. That's 75% of 'Windows conformance tests' that don't work on Windows! Out of the 32 tests, only 4, that's 12.5%, execute