Hi,
Testing wine's control.exe replacements
makes me show this :
If i remove/rename original control.exe, I can do :
$ control
and I have the Wine Control Panel as it has been
installed in /usr/local/bin.
But I cannot do:
$ wine control
wine: cannot find 'control'
So if one app calls for
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 09:44:07PM +0200, Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
Shouldn't we provide a default drive for /usr or
/usrlocal/bin in the config file ? This would solve
the can't load winedbg 123456 issue that users
usually include in their first reports.
(the debugger cannot be launched
Joerg Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While I think that doing something like this should really be done,
I don't like mixing windows/wine executables and linux (aka native
os) executables. Maybe some directory like /usr/local/win (or winebin)
would be better.
My plan is to integrate that
You have exactly the same idea I had 3 months ago,
but at this moment I thought this wouldn't be
accepted.
And this is so simple to desactivate a builtin app
this way when it's not enough complete.
My plan is to integrate that with the loadorder and
builtin dll
mechanism. So
