My last update was Tuesday 2000-09-19.
However the CVS iteself has made progress since then.
Any ideas?
I've noticed that the wine-devel has gone very slow. In fact, wine2.winehq.com
has ben refusing connections and the backup mailserver at Corel has been
bouncing messages for no obvious reason.
I don't know whether this helps
David Howells
Hey, shouldn't we organize the Wine-Developers Movement Against Majordomo?
Let me see if I can remember some of the people I know don't like majordomo:
- myself
- Dimitrie O. Paun
- Jutta Wrage
- Peter Hunnisett
- David Elliott
- Andreas Mohr
(anyone I forgot?)
Compare with the people I know
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 01:09:38PM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
Hey, shouldn't we organize the Wine-Developers Movement Against Majordomo?
*ACK*
Let me see if I can remember some of the people I know don't like majordomo:
- myself
- Dimitrie O. Paun
- Jutta Wrage
- Peter Hunnisett
- David
Andreas Mohr writes:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 01:09:38PM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
...
(anyone I forgot?)
Not that I know of.
If the missing wine-cvs mails for the recent CVS commits are caused by
majordomo, count me as another member of the Wine-Developers Movement
Against Majordomo.
"OK" == Ove Kaaven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK Hey, shouldn't we organize the Wine-Developers Movement Against
OK Majordomo?
Hoe exactly is Majordomo implicated in this? If delivery is slow, it is
the MTA's fault because Majordomo does not do delivery. If messages are
being refused, it is
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 06:52:08PM +0200, Patrik Stridvall wrote:
Andreas Mohr writes:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 01:09:38PM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
...
(anyone I forgot?)
Not that I know of.
If the missing wine-cvs mails for the recent CVS commits are caused by
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Andreas Mohr wrote:
OK, let's stop bitchin' and flamin' now and let's get back to work ;-)
So what to do ?
For one, I'd prefer to keep the this discussion on the web-admin list, so
that Wine development doesn't get crowded out by administrivia. (I just
added you