Re: wine/port.h #include fixes

2001-10-15 Thread François Gouget
François Gouget wrote: This is a followup on the previous config.h patch, this time tackling the wine/port.h case. Hmmm, I see it has been applied to CVS already. But I'm not too happy with it anymore :-/ I found a problem with 'dlls/winsock/async.c' and 'dlls/winsock/socket.c' and

Messy diff

2001-10-15 Thread Johan Gill
I found that there were problems with --debugmsg=+relay when hitting a function call with an invalid pointer as parameter. wine_dbgstr_an() would try to dereference the pointer, resulting in a crash. Here's a patch for it. If anything is done the wrong way, please comment on it. /Johan Gill,

Re: wine/port.h #include fixes

2001-10-15 Thread Roger Fujii
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Doing this (except for port.h) I have a tree that builds on Solaris with no _FILE_OFFSET_BITS warning. So if the above sounds good, I have patches that are almost ready. does this build run on solaris? I've been trying for the last couple of days to get the

Re: wine/port.h #include fixes

2001-10-15 Thread Jeremy White
It's slowly coming around (Francois recent patches are key), but we still have some fairly serious issues. You've hit the first issue - being sure to use the GNU tool chain. Doing a cvs update and trying again (after, of course, Alexandre commits Francois' recent patches) may bring you more

Re: wine/port.h #include fixes

2001-10-15 Thread Roger Fujii
Jeremy White wrote: It's slowly coming around (Francois recent patches are key), but we still have some fairly serious issues. goodit isn't me... ;) You've hit the first issue - being sure to use the GNU tool chain. Doing a cvs update and trying again (after, of course, Alexandre