In file included from /usr/comun/src/mc_vis32.cpp:201:
/opt/wine/include/wine/wincon.h:25: parse error before `__attribute__'
/opt/wine/include/wine/wincon.h:229: `PHANDLER_ROUTINE' was not declared
in this
scope
which compiler do you use? (name and version and which platform ?)
A+
Thanks for answering at first, Eric.
I'm using gcc version 2.91.66, the default compiler for Red Hat 6.2, and
this is the operative system I'm interested in.
Please give us a solution! I see that the only solution for this has
been Thomas' Quinots patch for x11lib, which only works for XFree 3.3.1
which is only available in some ancient ... well considering we'd prefer
to run RedHat 7.X or SuSE 7.X or Mandrake 8.X running RH 5.0 is somewhat
too
Something not to do with licencing, I hope that poeple have time for
this as well. :)
I've submitted a patch that is the preliminary for processing the files
that are installed with a setup in order to be deleted/renamed when
windows boots. The files are now entered into the registry as I have
Hi,
I've been trying to fix up the code in controls/scrollbar.c to
deal with overflow of a 32-bit int, but I've run into a problem.
In my test application, InfoPtr-MaxVal= is 0x7FFF (The largest
signed int). InfoPtr-MinVal = 0.
However, in various places in the code
At 08:58 PM 2/15/02 +0100, Patrik Stridvall wrote:
Just because you might possibly be right as far as CodeWeavers
are concern doesn't nessarily mean that it is good for Wine.
Yes and it makes sense that you do because increasing
the amount of freely available Wine code can only benifit
you,
At 12:32 PM 2/15/02 -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
Exactly the opposite is true. When the (L)GPL is stamped
onto code, every commercial programmer must reinvent
the wheel rather than using it. Many of these programmers
work for small businesses that are trying to compete
Another good point from your
At 04:13 PM 2/15/02 -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
just fare. An LGPL licence will keep most of them still viable (such as
TransGaming, for example). WTF is your problem with it?
--
Dimi.
AFAIK, Transgaming will have big problems with LGPL. It is Codeweavers that
will still be viable.
Roland
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Downloaded the cvs this morning (2002-02-18) and found that
tools/wineinstall wouldn't run properly.
It will stop after the configure step since in the latest configure
script generation of config.cache is disabled.
Is the wineinstall script
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Ignasi Villagrasa wrote:
I have several Win32 console applications. I want to migrate them to
Linux, and have installed and configured Wine. My target is to migrate
the programs via winelib. So I don't want to run my applications on the
fly as windows binary code, but
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 14:41, Roland wrote:
At 12:32 PM 2/15/02 -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
Exactly the opposite is true. When the (L)GPL is stamped
onto code, every commercial programmer must reinvent
the wheel rather than using it. Many of these programmers
work for small businesses that are
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Jeremy White wrote:
I think this is a good idea; if Ove or someone else
doesn't beat me to it, I'll ask Jeremy Newman to make one tomorrow.
One thought, though, perhaps wine-legal would be a better name.
Sorry,
But I think this is a lowsy idea, because:
1. There
At 03:16 AM 2/18/2002, Boris Buegling wrote:
The LGPL would protect Codeweavers from projects like Lindows (as it looks to me).
You have not made any credible argument as to why Lindows would harm
Codeweavers in any way. They could, in fact, be a good client of
Codeweavers. But Codeweavers
Thanks for answering to everyone.
The problem came from gcc compiler version. I changed it and the problem
was solved.
Ignasi Villagrasa.
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
AFAIK, Transgaming will have big problems with LGPL. It is Codeweavers that
will still be viable.
And why is that? In fact, Gav failed to even hint at why a LGPLed Wine
would invalidate TG's current business model.
I had thought that I articulated our issues
- Original Message -
From: Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Guy L. Albertelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: RESUBMIT: Some more Shlwapi ordinal routines
Guy L. Albertelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 11:16 AM 2/18/02 +0100, Boris Buegling wrote:
sells this whole package. With LGPL, they had to give the code back or they
can't do their project. Since they are not giving back their code, there is no
loss in not doing their project for the WINE project as a whole. A coding
There is no loss
At 01:49 PM 2/18/02 -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
And why is that? In fact, Gav failed to even hint at why a LGPLed Wine
would invalidate TG's current business model.
AFAIK TG sells their own version of WINE. Once WINE is GPL'd, they will
have to give all their code back. So why should anyone
At 01:58 PM 2/18/02 -0600, Sean Farley wrote:
They have release Darwin as well as an NFS testing tool. FreeBSD did
benefit a lot from that testing tool.
Yes, I have read that by now. This is another point in favour of the BSD
license.
Besides, as the owner of a company, he can always decide
Gerhard W. Gruber wrote:
Does anybody know what the \??\ stands for and wether the '1' for the
I cannot answer the second part, but the \??\ is Windows NT's answer to
/ - it is the root of the filesystem that is visible from within the NT
kernel. Various device files, and mounted file
20 matches
Mail list logo
