On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 18:18, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
You may be able to install it by playing with the load order (i.e. set
ole32 to native only). Having a bogus version in the builtin is going
to force everybody to install the native, which is not what we want.
g, yes you are quite
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 23:42, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Version 2.0 is awfully old for ole32.dll. Why do you need that?
The primary motivation for this bugfix was to enable the DCOM98
installer to work again correctly. It requires at least 4.something,
otherwise it refuses to install. As our OLE
Mike Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The primary motivation for this bugfix was to enable the DCOM98
installer to work again correctly. It requires at least 4.something,
otherwise it refuses to install. As our OLE framework isn't yet up to
scratch for some tasks, being able to install it is
Mike Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
diff -u -r1.1 version.rc
--- dlls/ole32/version.rc 28 Mar 2003 19:33:04 - 1.1
+++ dlls/ole32/version.rc 13 Jul 2003 13:09:17 -
@@ -21,4 +21,8 @@
#define WINE_OLESELFREGISTER
#define WINE_FILENAME_STR ole32.dll
+#define
