Re: Winelib status

2001-01-18 Thread Thomas Dodd
Francois Gouget wrote: Since your application runs well in Wine and does not require any MS library you should be able to compile it relatively easily. You said it does not depend on any MS dll. I assume this means it's not MFC-based which is a good omen (because if it's MFC based you'll

Re: Winelib status

2001-01-18 Thread Francois Gouget
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Thomas Dodd wrote: [...] I didn't write it, but it was written using Delphi according to the help files. Any way to find out what DLLs are being used, without extra huge amounts of messages? Ah, it's written with Delphi. It's different then, I thought it was a C/C++

Re: Winelib status

2001-01-18 Thread gerard patel
At 10:01 AM 1/18/01 -0800, you wrote: On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Thomas Dodd wrote: [...] I didn't write it, but it was written using Delphi according to the help files. Any way to find out what DLLs are being used, without extra huge amounts of messages? Ah, it's written with Delphi. It's

Re: Winelib status

2001-01-18 Thread Francois Gouget
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, gerard patel wrote: At 10:01 AM 1/18/01 -0800, you wrote: On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Thomas Dodd wrote: [...] I didn't write it, but it was written using Delphi according to the help files. Any way to find out what DLLs are being used, without extra huge amounts of

Winelib status

2001-01-17 Thread Thomas Dodd
What's up with winelib these days? I found a windows app that runs great under Wine in emulation mode with out any windows dlls. I'd like to make an easy to distribute/setup/run version of it. Would porting with winelib or wint+libs+app be the easiest? smallest? best? I don't have the source

Re: Winelib status

2001-01-17 Thread Francois Gouget
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Thomas Dodd wrote: What's up with winelib these days? Only good things :-) I found a windows app that runs great under Wine in emulation mode with out any windows dlls. I'd like to make an easy to distribute/setup/run version of it. Would porting with winelib or