Kirill K. Smirnov wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed very strange thing today: www.winehq.org resolves to
http://searchportal.information.com/index.mas?epl=00630086VFAXVE0DWlgV
VRBeVwtAVw5ZB14NW1YMBAhCUVZRWRQbWxBfHwRsXQUNU1oBVFc
This site claims to be winehq.org.
Winehq.org - What you need, when
Philip A. Marshall schreef:
For what it's worth, I added the Edgy wine repository and used the Edgy
packages for wine 0.9.34 under Feisty. It seems to work, so I'll
probably use the Edgy repository until the Feisty repository starts up.
I did the same, it doesn't seem to mind, only
Thanks all, culript is found!
My /etc/hosts, /etc/resolv.conf are OK.
At last I changed nameserver to the public one (195.242.2.126) and everything
began to work!
I think someone hijacked DNS in the LAN.
What is strange, all other sites except winehq.org I tried worked OK. So I put
the issue
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 11:38 -0600, Philip A. Marshall wrote:
For what it's worth, I added the Edgy wine repository and used the Edgy
packages for wine 0.9.34 under Feisty. It seems to work, so I'll
probably use the Edgy repository until the Feisty repository starts up.
Expect it to be
I have a single, very old application that needs to run in Windows 98
mode with a 640x480 virtual desktop.
But, I'd like to run other applications at the same time. How come I
can't set winecfg to make a virtual desktop for just this application,
and handle everything else in the window manager?
On 4/10/07, Dan Kegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/10/07, Tom Wickline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about Photoshop 5? We still have one bug open against it:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7909
Version 5.5 is here:
On 4/10/07, Frank Russo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find myself in a similar dilemma... What if a few of us banded
together and put a bounty on a feature / app, or contracted codeweavers
to implement it? I think that would be great. Assuming we can agree on
something we'd like to fund, it
Scott Ritchie wrote:
I have a single, very old application that needs to run in Windows 98
mode with a 640x480 virtual desktop.
But, I'd like to run other applications at the same time. How come I
can't set winecfg to make a virtual desktop for just this application,
and handle everything else
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:56:33AM -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
How come I
can't set winecfg to make a virtual desktop for just this application,
Did you try with explorer as described at
http://wiki.winehq.org/DesktopWindow ?
Jan
Wednesday April 11 2007 09:56、Scott Ritchie さんは書きました:
I have a single, very old application that needs to run in Windows 98
mode with a 640x480 virtual desktop.
But, I'd like to run other applications at the same time. How come I
can't set winecfg to make a virtual desktop for just this
Hi again all, before I go and file another needless bug, I thought I
would ask for opinions.
I decided to try to run Process Explorer today with wine. When I
first ran it, I got a dialog about missing a function. So I looked
back thru the traces and it was because we were missing acledit.dll..
Tom Spear wrote:
Hi again all, before I go and file another needless bug, I thought I
would ask for opinions.
I decided to try to run Process Explorer today with wine. When I
first ran it, I got a dialog about missing a function. So I looked
back thru the traces and it was because we were
On 4/11/07, Tom Wickline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for all the info. I've collected it at
http://wiki.winehq.org/AdobePhotoshop
which is my let's get Photoshop working well page.
Hmmm...
PS 5.5 : http://frankscorner.org/index.php?p=ps55
PS 6.0 :
Tom Spear wrote:
I decided to try to run Process Explorer today with wine. When I
first ran it, I got a dialog about missing a function. So I looked
back thru the traces and it was because we were missing acledit.dll..
So I imported that from my windows xp install, and got the dialog
again.
On 4/11/07, Robert Shearman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They are only required because they are
imported by acledit.dll, as is also samlib.dll. You might want to do a
little debugging next time to see what modules are importing the DLLs.
The only DLL that is required directly and that needs to be
GAR! I just checked Paul's site after sending the last email. He
already has a stubbed version of acledit.
Paul, do you mind sending me what you have? I'd like to take a look,
but cant guarantee I can get anything done, but still, I'd at least
like to try.
Tom
On 4/11/07, Tom Spear [EMAIL
Onsdag 11 april 2007 16:48, skrev Tom Spear:
Hi again all, before I go and file another needless bug, I thought I
would ask for opinions.
I decided to try to run Process Explorer today with wine. When I
first ran it, I got a dialog about missing a function. So I looked
back thru the traces
Tom Spear wrote:
GAR! I just checked Paul's site after sending the last email. He
already has a stubbed version of acledit.
Paul, do you mind sending me what you have? I'd like to take a look,
but cant guarantee I can get anything done, but still, I'd at least
like to try.
Tom
Hi Tom,
I
Hi,
I have almost the same problem, I cannot perfom 'git fetch' for 2/3
weeks now, failed with timeout error. (git-clone too)
Any tricks ?
Thanks
Emmanuel
Le 10 avr. 07 à 21:17, Kirill K. Smirnov a écrit :
Hi,
I've noticed very strange thing today: www.winehq.org resolves to
Tom Spear a écrit :
Hi again all, before I go and file another needless bug, I thought I
would ask for opinions.
I decided to try to run Process Explorer today with wine. When I
first ran it, I got a dialog about missing a function. So I looked
back thru the traces and it was because we were
No, if native dlls are required then it's very helpful for users to know
which ones, and it's even better if you provide download links to these
dlls, by using sites such as www.dll-files.com or www.dll-downloads.com, or
uploading your own somewhere.
Helpful and better yes, but legal?
Legal? From Microsoft's standpoint, no, but as long as you have a
valid windows license, then I dont see why there should be any
problem. Thus the reason I didn't actually provide any links.
Besides, a quick google search for the dll brings up the dll-files
site for the dll..
Tom
On 4/11/07,
Onsdag 11 april 2007 20:09, skrev du :
No, if native dlls are required then it's very helpful for users to know
which ones, and it's even better if you provide download links to these
dlls, by using sites such as www.dll-files.com or www.dll-downloads.com,
or uploading your own somewhere.
Am Mittwoch 11 April 2007 20:26 schrieb Tom Spear:
Legal? From Microsoft's standpoint, no, but as long as you have a
valid windows license, then I dont see why there should be any
problem. Thus the reason I didn't actually provide any links.
Besides, a quick google search for the dll brings
On Mi, 2007-04-11 at 10:18 -0500, Tom Spear wrote:
Is there a fully stubbed dll in the current tree that I could use as a
reference to start a stub for acledit? I'd like to at least see how
far I can get with a stubbed dll,
Eric send already a sub, but ...
Is something missing here?
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 11:14 +, L. Rahyen wrote:
Wednesday April 11 2007 09:56、Scott Ritchie さんは書きました:
I have a single, very old application that needs to run in Windows 98
mode with a 640x480 virtual desktop.
But, I'd like to run other applications at the same time. How come I
Alexander Sørnes wrote:
No, if native dlls are required then it's very helpful for users to know
which ones, and it's even better if you provide download links to these
dlls, by using sites such as www.dll-files.com or www.dll-downloads.com,
or uploading your own somewhere.
Helpful and
Scott Ritchie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 11:14 +, L. Rahyen wrote:
Very simple. Run your application like this:
wine explorer /desktop=MyDesktopName,640x480 myprogram.exe
So why doesn't winecfg let me do this? ;)
Because it wouldn't do what you want, since
I just tried the patch is it fails, but I copied and pasted the code
into the correct files and am recompiling wine now. We will see just
how far we can get with the stubs..
Tom
P.S. did this get submitted to wine-patches today as well?
On 4/11/07, Eric Pouech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom
Greetings,
My googling skills are letting me down today. I believe I have seen several
people requesting to do the same and answers indicating it is possible.
However, after several hours of reading email archives from 2000-2007 are am
officially confused :-(
I have successfully ported an
Hello,
Bug 8022 (http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8022) has highlighted
something interesting which has me puzzled...
Basically lets take xcopy as an example command line application. It issues
messages to the screen using MSVCRT's wprintf(LUnicode string) type
function
Wprintf -
I'm not the DLL expert, but I think you're missing something here.
The problem is that your windows dll will most likely use the windows
api(otherwise, don't use wine at all). The windows API depends on some other
things, like a few memory management constraints, the windows registry, and
most
or to write some proxy winelib app and
talk to the DLL using ipc like sockets,
pipes, shared memory, etc.
Thanks Stefan. I thought I was missing something.
This was the approach that I was planning on as a backup. Looks like I bring
the backup plan to the front burner. Basically Linux
Am Donnerstag 12 April 2007 00:28 schrieb Phil Lodwick:
or to write some proxy winelib app and
talk to the DLL using ipc like sockets,
pipes, shared memory, etc.
Thanks Stefan. I thought I was missing something.
This was the approach that I was planning on as a backup. Looks like I
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 22:35 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Scott Ritchie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 11:14 +, L. Rahyen wrote:
Very simple. Run your application like this:
wine explorer /desktop=MyDesktopName,640x480 myprogram.exe
So why doesn't
Hello All,
I have been pondering the thoughts of running every benchmark that I
have on Wine, Cedega, XP, and CX to see where we stack up in the
performance game.
And while doing my daily reading of news sites I came across this posted on /.
Okay, I've spent the last days looking into this matter and I'd like to
suggest a way to get it started. So. This is the plan:
1. In winex11.drv:
-INT X11DRV_LockDIBSection(X11DRV_PDEVICE *physDev, INT req, BOOL lossy)
+HBITMAP X11DRV_LockDIBSection(X11DRV_PDEVICE *physDev, INT req, BOOL
Oops. Forgot the patches. Here they are.
And the very second I sent the last E-Mail the DIB engine work got
accepted as a SoC project (by someone else)... I've no idea what this
means to me. Someone clarify please. :)
diff --git a/dlls/winex11.drv/bitblt.c b/dlls/winex11.drv/bitblt.c
index
As a returning GSoC student, I had asked about this last year:
It's primarily the student's responsibility to work out the conflicts,
but it'd be best for you two to talk to one another. The student's
obligation is do do what they said they would, so if you complete
their proposal for them it
On 4/11/07, Matt Finnicum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a returning GSoC student, I had asked about this last year:
It's primarily the student's responsibility to work out the conflicts,
but it'd be best for you two to talk to one another. The student's
obligation is do do what they said they
On 4/11/07, Jesse Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That'd be me apparently.
http://code.google.com/soc/wine/about.html
Jesse
--
Tom Wickline
Respectable computing - Linux/FOSS
Ann Jason Edmeades [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bug 8022 (http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8022) has highlighted
something interesting which has me puzzled...
Basically lets take xcopy as an example command line application. It issues
messages to the screen using MSVCRT's wprintf(LUnicode
42 matches
Mail list logo
