On Thursday 19 April 2007 23:34, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> James Liggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Actually I think in this case they would be. Most compilers do this by
> > default IIRC (if you'd like to see for yourself, try the attached test.)
> > Still, I think it would be prudent to pu
"Kirill K. Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
@@ -141,12 +138,19 @@ HWND WINAPI GetConsoleWindow(VOID)
*/
UINT WINAPI GetConsoleCP(VOID)
{
-if (!console_input_codepage)
+BOOL ret;
+UINT codepage = GetOEMCP(); /* default value */
+
+SERVER_START_REQ(get_console_input_info)
I actually have a Vista Home Basic install on a laptop that I can
check testcases on, at least for right now. I'm thinking of going out
and getting a licensed copy of xp for it (linux isn't viable for it
because it isnt my laptop and its being used as the main pc for
business transactions, so it
I rewrote the patch based on your suggestions, and I'm having a little
difficulty with certain things. I did a little more testing, and it
turns out that the uninstaller I was using removes the local machine
uninstall entry on its own. So I started futzing with the code some
to try to figure a w
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 14:41 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Christoph Frick schreef:
> > why do you compile the drivers in - or why do have the files around for
> > them? my audio dialog just shows oss and alsa; the others get dropped at
> > compile time. also there might be other platforms that
On 4/19/07, EA Durbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You might have more luck getting these three patches
>in if you also checked in a conformance test that depended on them.
The .dll is a stub dll, according to the wiki developer hints page it has to
be added first with only DLLMain before I can s
From: "Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "wine-devel@winehq.org"
CC: "EA Durbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: re: clusapi.h - add states for GetNodeClusterState()
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:18:19 -0700
You might have more luck getting these three patches
in if you also checked in a conformanc
From: "Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "wine-devel@winehq.org"
CC: "EA Durbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: re: clusapi.h - add states for GetNodeClusterState()
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:18:19 -0700
You might have more luck getting these three patches
in if you also checked in a conforman
From: Michael Stefaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: wine-devel@winehq.org
Subject: Re: Add new dll - sxs.dll
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:42:18 -0400
EA Durbin wrote:
_
Mortgage refinance is Hot. *Terms. Get a 5
On 4/19/07, Tom Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Try applying the patch before you comment on it. See below..
I read all your reply comments, and nothing you said leads me to
believe that I need to apply this patch to review it.
On 4/19/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/19
Am Thursday 19 April 2007 12:14 schrieb Alexandre Julliard:
> Stefan Leichter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > +/* Recursively delete all the subkeys */
> > +for (i = 0; i < dwKeyCount && !ret; i++) {
> > +dwSize = dwMaxSubkeyLen;
> > +
James Liggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually I think in this case they would be. Most compilers do this by
> default IIRC (if you'd like to see for yourself, try the attached test.)
> Still, I think it would be prudent to put the 0 in there anyway, sine I
> don't think there's a standard t
Try applying the patch before you comment on it. See below..
On 4/19/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/19/07, Tom Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apparently the last patch had multiple patches in the file because I
> didnt delete it before creating the new one..
>
> So here w
On 4/19/07, Tom Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Apparently the last patch had multiple patches in the file because I
didnt delete it before creating the new one..
So here we go again.
Check HKCU as well as HKLM for uninstall entries, using a for loop
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
/**
* Used to output
EA Durbin wrote:
_
Mortgage refinance is Hot. *Terms. Get a 5.375%* fix rate. Check savings
https://www2.nextag.com/goto.jsp?product=10035&url=%2fst.jsp&tm=y&search=mortgage_text_links_88_h2bbb&disc=y&vers=925&s=4056&p=5117
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 07:49 +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 April 2007 20:39, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> > +static int resolver_initialised;
>
> Shouldn't that be
>
> static int resolver_initilised = 0;
>
> here? I thought that in C, ints aren't initialized to 0 automatically.
Actually I t
You might have more luck getting these three patches
in if you also checked in a conformance test that depended on them.
And were you careful to write winsxs.h yourself as opposed to
copying and pasting from a Microsoft header or web page?
- Dan
Anssi Hannula wrote:
marco wrote:
Ivan Leo Puoti has not much time lately to make the rpms for mandriva.
So I volunteered to make them.
So I made a rpm from the latest rpm.
How do I get this rpm on the winehq download server ?
Note that latest Wine RPMS for Mandriva 2007.0 are also
On a Solaris system, getaddrinfo is not found during the AC_CHECK_FUNC
test, because the libs required for getaddrinfo have not been found on Solaris
yet. By moving the AC_CHECK_FUNC for getaddrinfo, below where
libsocket and libnsl are checked, getaddrinfo is now found on Solaris, and
I'm able
"Kirill K. Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ChangeLog:
add Russian resource
Please pass it through a spell checker first, there are spelling
errors along with wrong punctuation in your translation.
--
Dmitry.
Stefan Leichter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +/* Recursively delete all the subkeys */
> +for (i = 0; i < dwKeyCount && !ret; i++) {
> +dwSize = dwMaxSubkeyLen;
> +ret = RegEnumKeyExW(hSubKey, i, lpszName, &dwSize, NULL,
> +
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/d3drmdef.h
...
+#ifdef WIN32
+#define D3DRMAPI __stdcall
+#else
+#define D3DRMAPI
+#endif
What's the point of the WIN32 macro test (does this mean that win64 doesn't
have stdcall decorations)? Also (I already pointed out to it) is it n
22 matches
Mail list logo
