On Mo, 2009-01-05 at 22:10 -0500, Markus wrote:
can anyone tell me where to find information about the b3DAccelerationExists
and b3DAccelerationEnabled properties in the display container returned by
I suggest to use dxdiag and regmon on Windows.
In dxdiag, you can disable DirectDraw /
Hi,
In the following commit you added the netconn_set_timeout() function to
net.c. However today it is unused. Is there any plan to use it? Is it
still relevant?
commit 266c4b2c046b334ca44cdc1826c4434625dcb29f
Author: Hans Leidekker h...@codeweavers.com
Date: Tue Aug 26 11:03:19 2008
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 10:22:17 Francois Gouget wrote:
In the following commit you added the netconn_set_timeout() function to
net.c. However today it is unused. Is there any plan to use it? Is it
still relevant?
Yes, it should be called from WinHttpSetTimeouts at some point.
-Hans
Hi,
In the following commit you added the OutputPin_DeliverNewSegment()
function to pin.c. However today it is unused. Is there any plan to use
it? Is it still relevant?
commit 0a6f11c88a8da49d80e4e7d8a0236ae4b36926b7
Author: Robert Shearman r.j.shear...@warwick.ac.uk
Date: Thu Sep 25
2009/1/6 Rico Schüller kgbric...@web.de:
Allan Tong schrieb:
Wrong pointer was being passed to HeapFree.
- Allan
Why did you remove these two lines? Was this your intention?
-dev_multistate_funcs[cur[i].state][0] =
multistate_funcs[cur[i].state][0];
-
Allan Tong schrieb:
Wrong pointer was being passed to HeapFree.
- Allan
Why did you remove these two lines? Was this your intention?
-dev_multistate_funcs[cur[i].state][0] =
multistate_funcs[cur[i].state][0];
-
2009/1/6 Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com:
Hi,
For some reason this only shows up when I use my own cross compiled tests.
Changelog
ILFree() is only exported by ordinal on Win9x
ILFree is exported using -noname in Wine, so it should be imported by
ordinal. You need to investigate
Rob Shearman wrote:
2009/1/6 Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com:
Hi,
For some reason this only shows up when I use my own cross compiled tests.
Changelog
ILFree() is only exported by ordinal on Win9x
ILFree is exported using -noname in Wine, so it should be imported by
ordinal. You
Rob Shearman robertshear...@gmail.com writes:
2009/1/6 Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com:
Hi,
For some reason this only shows up when I use my own cross compiled tests.
Changelog
ILFree() is only exported by ordinal on Win9x
ILFree is exported using -noname in Wine, so it should be
2009/1/6 Francois Gouget fgou...@free.fr:
In the following commit you added the OutputPin_DeliverNewSegment()
function to pin.c. However today it is unused. Is there any plan to use
it? Is it still relevant?
Not, it looks like it has been superseded by InputPin_NewSegment. If
Maarten agrees,
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Rob Shearman robertshear...@gmail.com writes:
2009/1/6 Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com:
Hi,
For some reason this only shows up when I use my own cross compiled tests.
Changelog
ILFree() is only exported by ordinal on Win9x
ILFree is exported using
Now, the story changes if the patch is conforming and has been accepted
by AJ and is pending the next development release.
Then the next development release can get the gold, but previous ones still
shouldn't. AppDB test ratings are tied to specific releases, and intended to
tell normal
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Henri Verbeet hverb...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/6 Rico Schüller kgbric...@web.de:
Allan Tong schrieb:
Wrong pointer was being passed to HeapFree.
- Allan
Why did you remove these two lines? Was this your intention?
-
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Rosanne DiMesio dime...@earthlink.net wrote:
Now, the story changes if the patch is conforming and has been accepted
by AJ and is pending the next development release.
Then the next development release can get the gold, but previous ones still
shouldn't.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Nathaniel Gray n8g...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Rosanne DiMesio dime...@earthlink.net wrote:
Now, the story changes if the patch is conforming and has been accepted
by AJ and is pending the next development release.
Then the next
It sounds like the problem is that the version string in appdb isn't
descriptive enough. It's perfectly reasonable to wonder if a given
program can be made to work with a patched version of wine, and wonder
how well it will work. It's also reasonable to wonder how it will
work with a
Dan Kegel wrote:
wine-1.1.12 has a couple regressions in it:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16754
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16732
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16708
Please consider either cherrypicking the fixes,
or skipping wine-1.1.12.
1.1.11 had a
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:25 PM, G. Paul Ziemba p-wine-b...@ziemba.us wrote:
Fix for PR 16592, GetVolumeInformationW() handling of unusual root
parameter.
--- dlls/kernel32/volume.c.orig 2008-12-05 08:57:45.0 -0800
+++ dlls/kernel32/volume.c 2008-12-22 00:15:51.0 -0800
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:49 PM, G. Paul Ziemba p-wine-b...@ziemba.us wrote:
FreeBSD fix for Nirvis CDJ application, PR 16828
--- dlls/ntdll/serial.c.orig2008-12-20 06:55:38.0 -0800
+++ dlls/ntdll/serial.c 2009-01-05 21:35:47.0 -0800
@@ -648,7 +648,9 @@
port.c_cflag
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Rosanne DiMesio dime...@earthlink.net wrote:
Now, the story changes if the patch is conforming and has been accepted
by AJ and is pending the next development release.
Then the next development release can get the gold, but previous ones still
shouldn't.
austinengl...@gmail.com (Austin English) writes:
Again, no C++ comments.
Oops. Self-LART applied. Should I resubmit patches with modified comments
to wine-patches?
~!paul
--
G. Paul Ziemba
FreeBSD unix:
11:06AM up 12 days, 21:45, 11 users, load averages: 0.27, 0.23, 0.24
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:08 PM, G. Paul Ziemba pz-wine-de...@ziemba.us wrote:
austinengl...@gmail.com (Austin English) writes:
Again, no C++ comments.
Oops. Self-LART applied. Should I resubmit patches with modified comments
to wine-patches?
~!paul
--
G. Paul Ziemba
FreeBSD unix:
Very small suggestion - it would be helpful to have dates included
somewhere (preferably near the top) of the wine announce pages, for
example:
http://www.winehq.org/announce/1.1.12
This will let people who come to it via search engines know what date
this particular release was made on, without
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Rosanne DiMesio dime...@earthlink.net wrote:
It sounds like the problem is that the version string in appdb isn't
descriptive enough. It's perfectly reasonable to wonder if a given
program can be made to work with a patched version of wine, and wonder
how
Sometimes to make an app work, you need to copy over
some native dlls.
To get these dlls don't you need to own a copy of windows?
Could this be a criterion in the rating system?
Wether or not you need to own a copy of windows?
nick
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Nathaniel Gray n8g...@gmail.com wrote:
It sounds like the problem is that the version string in appdb isn't
descriptive enough. It's perfectly reasonable to wonder if a given
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:03 AM, James Mckenzie
jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net wrote:
No, the appdb should not be touched. Rosanne said it correctly, ordinary
users are NOT going to take the time to build Wine, nor should they. We can
put in the bug report that the patch works and whether or
Ian Macfarlane wrote:
Very small suggestion - it would be helpful to have dates included
somewhere (preferably near the top) of the wine announce pages
Speaking of dates... My pet peeve is seeing ambiguous dates such as
2/1/08. To me (and most of the world), that looks like 2nd Jan 2008, but
it
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
Adds a note discouraging use of UNIX paths, since there's seems to
have been a rash of it in recent bug reports.
If we don't recommend it, and usually advise against it, why not just
remove that line from the README?
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:07 PM, James Hawkins trui...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Adds a note discouraging use of UNIX paths, since there's seems to
have been a rash of it in recent bug reports.
If we don't recommend it,
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 03:58:27 Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
On Mo, 2009-01-05 at 22:10 -0500, Markus wrote:
can anyone tell me where to find information about the
b3DAccelerationExists and b3DAccelerationEnabled properties in the
display container returned by
I suggest to use dxdiag and
Hi,
I would like to know if there is any issues as to why we are not using
pkg-config to check for needed library's with the m4 macros.
Also this question arose in #winehackers
TBBle Hmm. Is pkg-config broken under mingw? And do we care?
Regards,
Danny Rawlins
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Paul TBBle Hampson
paul.hamp...@pobox.com wrote:
Not much to say about this. It's needed for the unit tests coming up.
--
---
Paul TBBle Hampson, B.Sc, LPI, MCSE
Very-later-year Asian Studies student, ANU
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 12:22:15AM -0600, Austin English wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Paul TBBle Hampson
paul.hamp...@pobox.com wrote:
Not much to say about this. It's needed for the unit tests coming up.
+// Used for all tags where IsReparseTagMicrosoft is false
+// and for some
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Andrey Turkin andrey.tur...@gmail.com wrote:
.NET 1.1 uses this dll during installation
---
configure.ac |1 +
dlls/loadperf/Makefile.in | 13 +
dlls/loadperf/loadperf.spec | 14 ++
Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
Not much to say about this. It's needed for the unit tests coming up.
Hi Paul,
Part of your signature says:
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/au/
Does this mean your
36 matches
Mail list logo
