2009/2/24 Stefan Dösinger ste...@codeweavers.com:
+static void shader_glsl_gen_sample_code(const SHADER_OPCODE_ARG *arg, DWORD
sampler, const char *coord_reg,
+const glsl_sample_function_t
*sample_function, const char *dst_swizzle,
+
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 8:57:23 pm Scott Ritchie wrote:
It would also make it completely unusable. Remember, all downloaded
executables (even intentionally downloaded ones) will be -x by default.
Do you really expect users to go right
click-properties-permissions-allow execution? Or
Hi Paul, minor comments :
programs/winetest/main.c | 60
+-
1 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/programs/winetest/main.c b/programs/winetest/main.c
index 74a4307..58e520b 100644
--- a/programs/winetest/main.c
+++
Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
Hi Paul, minor comments :
+static void append_path( const char *path)
+{
+char *newpath;
+
+newpath = xmalloc(strlen(curpath) + 1 + strlen(path) + 1);
+strcpy(newpath, curpath);
+strcat(newpath, ;);
+strcat(newpath, path);
+
Hello Dylan,
please do not add the English strings for stringtable resources that
aren't broken (here the Hungarian translation). It makes it hard to
automatically detect (http://www.mikolaj.zalewski.pl/wine-transl/) if
the resource is translated or not.
Also you have fixed only the traditional
+
+ /* We have a dll that cannot be found through
LoadLibraryExA.
This
+ * is the case for .NET provided dll's. We will add the
directory
+ * where the dll resides to the PATH variable when dealing
with
+ * the tests for this dll.
+
Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
+
+/* We have a dll that cannot be found through
LoadLibraryExA.
This
+ * is the case for .NET provided dll's. We will add the
directory
+ * where the dll resides to the PATH variable when dealing
with
+ * the tests for
2009/2/25 Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com:
Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
+
+ /* We have a dll that cannot be found through
LoadLibraryExA.
This
+ * is the case for .NET provided dll's. We will add the
directory
+ * where the dll resides to the PATH
Dan Kegel wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org wrote:
When I brought this up at the Ubuntu Developer Summit a while back, the
security conscious there wanted to check an executable for the execute
bit before launching it with Wine. Then, the user would be
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Johan Dahlin jo...@gnome.org wrote:
Dan Kegel wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org
wrote:
When I brought this up at the Ubuntu Developer Summit a while back, the
security conscious there wanted to check an executable
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 8:38:15 am King InuYasha wrote:
Now that Nautilus has the desktop file requiring execute bit, I have a
question for all of you to consider. Do JAR files require the +x bit to
load them, or are they treated like associated files and run through the
interpreter?
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:38 AM, King InuYasha ngomp...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIK, the main difference between the Wine and Java methods is
that Wine doesn't sandbox its loading environment, while Java does.
Java doesn't create a sandbox when you run a normal application.
Which makes it a
Juan Lang wrote:
--Juan
Hi Juan,
The first 4 changes are not correct. Win9x returns TRUE (1) here.
--
Cheers,
Paul.
Paul Vriens wrote:
Juan Lang wrote:
--Juan
Hi Juan,
The first 4 changes are not correct. Win9x returns TRUE (1) here.
Well actually the first two on Win95 and the last two on Win95/Win98.
--
Cheers,
Paul.
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 9:22:29 am Vincent Povirk wrote:
This discussion has been assuming that .exe files are somehow special
because they are programs
Actually, I'm saying just the opposite. They are *not* special because they
are programs, and should honor the executable bit just like
Our currently released version is 1.0, but the appdb's
browse feature acts as if that version no longer exists.
This will seriously confuse newcomers who are using
the 1.0.1 version (e.g. anybody who installs a fresh
copy of Ubuntu!).
To fix this, we should add 1.0 (or 1.0.1) back into the search
I can't get pages from http://wiki.winehq.org,
though I can ping lattica.ca.
The web server there seems to close connections
after a long pause without any response.
it looks like the wiki server needs restarting?
Dan Kegel wrote:
I can't get pages from http://wiki.winehq.org,
though I can ping lattica.ca.
The web server there seems to close connections
after a long pause without any response.
it looks like the wiki server needs restarting?
Works again after Dimi rebooted the server.
bye
Chris Robinson wrote:
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 8:57:23 pm Scott Ritchie wrote:
Worse, you could actively irritate them - suppose they do double click
and you DONT offer the ability to open it, but instead instruct them to
go through that annoying procedure.
It's hardly annoying as it
I'm connecting to a Saris PowerTap 2.4SL bike computer, but really
it's a usb cradle using a standard FTDI chip. The device enumerates
and works fine as a ttyUSB device under Linux. I have gotten closer
to the root of this problem, and I now see why EV_RXFLAG was never
implemented in Wine. I'll
2009/2/26 Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com:
Our currently released version is 1.0, but the appdb's
browse feature acts as if that version no longer exists.
This will seriously confuse newcomers who are using
the 1.0.1 version (e.g. anybody who installs a fresh
copy of Ubuntu!).
To fix this, we
2009/2/26 King InuYasha ngomp...@gmail.com:
Now that Nautilus has the desktop file requiring execute bit, I have a
question for all of you to consider. Do JAR files require the +x bit to load
them, or are they treated like associated files and run through the
interpreter? Really, Windows apps
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/26 King InuYasha ngomp...@gmail.com:
Now that Nautilus has the desktop file requiring execute bit, I have a
question for all of you to consider. Do JAR files require the +x bit to
load
them, or are they treated
2009/2/26 King InuYasha ngomp...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/26 King InuYasha ngomp...@gmail.com:
Now that Nautilus has the desktop file requiring execute bit, I have a
question for all of you to consider. Do JAR files require the
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/26 King InuYasha ngomp...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/26 King InuYasha ngomp...@gmail.com:
Now that Nautilus has the desktop file requiring execute
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a compatibility layer. It doesn't actually interpret individual
instructions. As described earlier, Wine sets up an environment
suitable for the Windows apps to run in (which is primarily
*implementations* of win32
2009/2/26 King InuYasha ngomp...@gmail.com:
So, in theory, Wine could simply run itself on top of Linux (basically a
ReactOS desktop on top of Linux instead of the NT kernel) and work just like
Windows because it operates in a native app style? Granted, that probably
would require quite a bit
Ben Klein wrote:
2009/2/26 Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com:
Our currently released version is 1.0, but the appdb's
browse feature acts as if that version no longer exists.
This will seriously confuse newcomers who are using
the 1.0.1 version (e.g. anybody who installs a fresh
copy of Ubuntu!).
To
2009/2/25 Vincent Povirk madewokherd+8...@gmail.com:
Fixes bug 17485.
Vincent Povirk
diff --git a/dlls/shell32/shell32_En.rc b/dlls/shell32/shell32_En.rc
index f752e6d..d7fa7c3 100644
--- a/dlls/shell32/shell32_En.rc
+++ b/dlls/shell32/shell32_En.rc
@@ -282,6 +282,8 @@ STRINGTABLE
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure if it matters for .rc files, but you're using spaces whereas
the earlier entries are using tabs.
I know. I hate them.
Anyway, the even earlier entries are using spaces.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com wrote:
There have been plenty of cases in #winehq where users have some
problem with 1.0.1 (Warcraft 3 appears to be a popular candidate).
When they upgrade to 1.1.15, suddenly it starts working. Are there
even any winehq-supplied
Attached are some cursor patches I have been working on. These
patches store the cursor in the wineserver, clean up user32 a little
bit, draw .ani cursors more completely, and ultimately implement
themed cursors. I am sending them here for some last review (big
thanks to Henri for taking some
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/26 King InuYasha ngomp...@gmail.com:
Also, NTFS DOES have a concept of execute bits, but Windows itself does not
use them. An implementation of this is the trusted app scheme in the
properties in Windows Vista and
33 matches
Mail list logo
