Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
---
dlls/ntdll/file.c |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/file.c b/dlls/ntdll/file.c
index 0a6ee55..86c200f 100644
--- a/dlls/ntdll/file.c
+++ b/dlls/ntdll/file.c
@@ -2148,6 +2148,11 @@ NTSTATUS WINAPI
On 07/25/2010 09:45 AM, James McKenzie wrote:
Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
---
dlls/ntdll/file.c | 5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/file.c b/dlls/ntdll/file.c
index 0a6ee55..86c200f 100644
--- a/dlls/ntdll/file.c
+++ b/dlls/ntdll/file.c
@@ -2148,6
On 07/25/2010 12:04 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
On 07/25/2010 09:45 AM, James McKenzie wrote:
I think you missed what Nicolay and Dmitry are trying to tell you.
We are trying to implement, bug for bug, the functionality of what
Windows does. Does Windows return STATUS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED when
Andrew Eikum wrote:
On 07/25/2010 12:04 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
On 07/25/2010 09:45 AM, James McKenzie wrote:
I think you missed what Nicolay and Dmitry are trying to tell you.
We are trying to implement, bug for bug, the functionality of what
Windows does. Does Windows return
On 24 July 2010 16:10, Max TenEyck Woodbury m...@mtew.isa-geek.net wrote:
On 07/24/2010 10:58 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
On 7/24/2010 18:51, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
---
dlls/ntdll/file.c | 5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/file.c
James McKenzie jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net writes:
Also, strongly defending your patches without authoritative
information marks you as being arrogant. After a while, your patches
will be ignored. That is not a good place to be in this project.
Your habit of pretending to be an authority in
Hi,
Your Patch got wrapped. Try change some settings in you Mailclient please and
resubmit.
Thx
--
Best Regards, André Hentschel
Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
On 07/25/2010 01:55 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
Andrew Eikum wrote:
On 07/25/2010 12:04 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
On 07/25/2010 09:45 AM, James McKenzie wrote:
I think you missed what Nicolay and Dmitry are trying to tell you.
We are trying to implement, bug
2010/7/25 Max TenEyck Woodbury m...@mtew.isa-geek.net:
---
dlls/ntdll/file.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/file.c b/dlls/ntdll/file.c
index 86c200f..c32baa0 100644
--- a/dlls/ntdll/file.c
+++ b/dlls/ntdll/file.c
@@ -2150,7 +2150,7 @@
On 07/25/2010 01:55 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
Andrew Eikum wrote:
On 07/25/2010 12:04 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
On 07/25/2010 09:45 AM, James McKenzie wrote:
I think you missed what Nicolay and Dmitry are trying to tell you.
We are trying to implement, bug for bug, the functionality of
On 07/25/2010 01:34 PM, Andrew Eikum wrote:
On 07/25/2010 12:04 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
On 07/25/2010 09:45 AM, James McKenzie wrote:
I think you missed what Nicolay and Dmitry are trying to tell you.
We are trying to implement, bug for bug, the functionality of what
Windows does. Does
On 07/25/2010 02:25 PM, Reece Dunn wrote:
On 24 July 2010 16:10, Max TenEyck Woodburym...@mtew.isa-geek.net wrote:
On 07/24/2010 10:58 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
On 7/24/2010 18:51, Max TenEyck Woodbury wrote:
---
dlls/ntdll/file.c | 5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Mikko Rasa t...@tdb.fi wrote:
- static const DWORD user_flags = clip_flags | DCX_NORESETATTRS; /* flags
that can be set by user */
+ static const DWORD user_flags = DCX_PARENTCLIP | DCX_CLIPSIBLINGS |
DCX_CLIPCHILDREN | DCX_WINDOW
+ |
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Louis Lenders
xerox_xerox2...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
fixes http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23528
I don't mean to step on this patch, but I've sent a fuller
implementation of PSPropertyKeyFromString which, if accepted, should
take precedence over this stub.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3892
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3893
Your paranoid
On 07/25/2010 10:46 PM, (Marvin) wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
17 matches
Mail list logo
