On Friday 16 December 2005 23:07, Aric Cyr wrote:
Last time I checked gcc doesn't enable optimizations unless a -O option is
specified explicitly (don't know if this has changed though).
I realize it is a moot point wrt the topic, but as you may know, there's an
easy way to check. Running
On Friday 13 May 2005 19:07, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
Code using the C syntax described in the patent doesn't compile in winelib
yet [snip]. Give me a week or two...
Imagine that, it seems I have once again imagined myself to have more spare
time than I really do. Honestly, folks, I can't
On Saturday 11 June 2005 03:37, James Hawkins wrote:
On 6/10/05, Gregory M. Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I run the wine test suite under Windows again? I want to do this
by compiling from source.
I know the answer is out there -- maybe I have even asked this once
before
How do I run the wine test suite under Windows again? I want to do this by
compiling from source.
I know the answer is out there -- maybe I have even asked this once before and
been given the answer? But I can't find it for the life of me.
--
gmt
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 18:16, Dimi Paun wrote:
Also, I know you're modifying existing code, but if it's not
too much to ask, 2-space indent is hard to read, and the vast
majority of developers do prefer 4-space indent. So if you
don't mind, and we can find a solution, would be great if we
Hello, as you may recall I would like to start playing with SEH macros for
winelib (and maybe wine). I have not done any wine development for a year or
so, and have not followed the mailing list very carefully.
Anyone have any advice for me wrt getting up-to-speed? I am aware of the wiki
and
On Friday 13 May 2005 15:09, Francois Gouget wrote:
* The Slashdot summary makes it sound like Wine is infringing on the
patent and that we will have to remove some code.
Wine duplicates many of the data structures in Windows which are described in
the patent. Code using the C syntax
On Friday 06 May 2005 18:51, Mike Hearn wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 16:23 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
They clearly won't work as is, but if your question is whether it's
possible to use attribute((cleanup)), then yes you could probably use
that to make the current macros more
On Monday 09 May 2005 11:29, Mike Hearn wrote:
On Mon, 09 May 2005 07:41:46 +, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
As for the portability issue, why not an autoconf test? Perhaps the
answer is because there are still people foolish enough to run distro's
other than Gentoo. If so, then why
On Monday 09 May 2005 10:00, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
Jonathan Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why doesnt someone just implement the microsoft SEH keywords and
extentions into GCC like it should be?
Do you have any knowledge of GCC, to be able to do it, or help me do it?
The code exists to do
On Thursday 02 September 2004 10:27 am, Juan Lang wrote:
Greg, you still lurking around here?
Yes. But I am worthless atm due to being totally swamped in preparation for
going overseas to study. Unfortunately, I am not optimistic about how much
time I will have once I am a student...
On Wednesday 17 March 2004 07:44 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
Another thing I'd really like to see is a move to GNU arch version control
What do people think?
I'm using it at my new job and it's pretty dope imho. There are a few
downsides, some already have been mentioned (those--horrible--names,
On Thursday 26 February 2004 03:25 pm, Mike Hearn wrote:
Wow, fantastic! One thing, could you write up some basic info on
the structure of format strings? I'm just a bit concerned that one
day we'll have to rewrite the typelib marshaller to use this interpreter
and not know how, as this stuff
On Sunday 22 February 2004 03:49 pm, Robert van Herk wrote:
maman yonatan wrote:
so if I understand you properly, you say that there is
no way doing from _outside_ of wine (no matter what
kind of com object I have), is that correct?
Of course there is a way: you could make your own remote
On Saturday 24 January 2004 02:06 pm, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
OK, I'm not sure it's a virus (Don't have a win box at the moment), but
this emails should go in any case.
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-cvs/2004/01/0319.html
Ivan.
It's almost surely Bagle, recently mentioned on the
On Thursday 22 January 2004 12:05 am, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
Jeremy White wrote:
Did any one contact Xaim to see if they can send any MONO people to
wineconf?
Is there any vision on how these 2 integrate?
I haven't even touched MONO yet ( .NET for that mater), but from the
look of it they
On Tuesday 20 January 2004 08:05 am, Jeremy Newman wrote:
From the desk of Jeremy White (who is at LinuxWorld ATM).
Hey folks,
We've just launched a major new initiative, the
CodeWeavers CrossOver Compatibility Center.
You can check it out at
On Tuesday 06 January 2004 12:10 pm, Mike Hearn wrote:
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 17:59, Stefan Leichter wrote:
The pointer points to a structure like this:
struct ExtractFileList {
LPSTR filename;
struct ExtractFileList *next;
DWORD unknown; // always 1L
} ;
Could the
What about libs/unicode? I have no idea about that stuff, but isn't a
situation like this what those libs are for?
--
gmt
It is to be the assent and ratification of the several States,
derived from the supreme authority in each State, the authority
of the people themselves. The act,
On Sunday 28 December 2003 02:53 pm, Stefan Leichter wrote:
Hello,
during playing with ie5.5 installer i noticed that the installing of some
cab files failed directly after the extract call. Doing exactly the same
extract call with the same cabinet file and the same content of the first
On Friday 26 December 2003 06:27 am, Tom wrote:
Anyone have any comments, or something they believe I should add
before I send the patch?
Tom
Kernel32
Split 16/32 function, finish moving stuff into ntdll (review FS device
support)
Implement non-local named pipes and mailslots over SMB
On Monday 15 December 2003 04:25 pm, Mike Hearn wrote:
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 21:58, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
hmm, one minor difference... I use WINELOADER=/opt/wine/bin/wine (we
happen to have the same wine prefix)... perhaps the word simply above
was too strong ;)
Well, that is exactly
On Saturday 13 December 2003 04:40 am, Joshua Walker wrote:
There is one thing that really bugging the heck out
of me.
Most of the API documentation is possessed by MSDN.
In my humble opinion, this is a very dangerous and
volatile place to have it.
I was once told
On Saturday 13 December 2003 10:39 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
Hi,
Running wine in gdb appears to be broken with latest CVS:
(gdb) file wine
Reading symbols from wine...done.
Using host libthread_db library /lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1.
(gdb) run
Starting program: /opt/wine/bin/wine wine
[Thread
On Wednesday 10 December 2003 01:52 pm, Eric Pouech wrote:
Indeed. Looking at the loop in DEBUG_ReadExecutableDbgInfo, the values
of dyn.d_tag it iterates through look nothing like the output of readelf
-d wine (they should, right?)
yup
The numbers it shows me (after adding a trace)
On Saturday 06 December 2003 12:15 am, Eric Pouech wrote:
not really, in fact not reading .so file is linked to being able (or
not) to read the .dynamic section of the ELF header
Indeed. Looking at the loop in DEBUG_ReadExecutableDbgInfo, the values of
dyn.d_tag it iterates through look
On Monday 08 December 2003 04:44 pm, Casper Hornstrup wrote:
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne af Steven Edwards
Sendt: 8. december 2003 23:05
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: rpcrt4 and rpcss with WINE and ReactOS
Hello,
Ok I
On Monday 08 December 2003 06:21 pm, Steven Edwards wrote:
http://cvs.reactos.com/cvsweb.cgi/reactos/ntoskrnl/lpc/
Neat. Does it work well enough in ROS to support NT's native rpcrt4?
--
gmt
It is to be the assent and ratification of the several States,
derived from the supreme authority in
On Sunday 07 December 2003 02:58 pm, Lionel Ulmer wrote:
I tried that but it still crashes.
I think there is only the one in ~/.wine/config right?
Anyway, even if Wine may be faulty, an X crash is always an X bug or an X
driver bug :-)
Best way to fix this is to do a +relay trace with
On Friday 05 December 2003 04:15 pm, Chris Morgan wrote:
I can see about making this change as I did it once before
for the jack audio driver.
Can someone fix the debug symbols issue? I've got a patch
for the jack driver that I'm having trouble debugging
without it :-P
I think this may be
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 01:02 am, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
On Monday 01 December 2003 12:31 am, Rein Klazes wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:01:22 +0100, you wrote:
Mike Hearn wrote:
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 19:51, Rein Klazes wrote:
Still the same here. It can be a bug in Debian Sid
On Wednesday 03 December 2003 12:57 pm, Eric Pouech wrote:
poking around I find that the for loop in DEBUG_RegisterStabsDebugInfo
(in programs/winedbg/msc.c) never finds the .stab or .stabstr sections...
not sure if they are really there or not. For example, for ntdll, it
finds only .data
On Thursday 20 November 2003 02:26 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
Ran into this while browsing the code, it seems to
be a NULL pointer reference waiting to happen.
Am I missing something?
ChangeLog
Bail when we're out of memory.
Index: dlls/rpcrt4/rpc_binding.c
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 01:22 pm, Parzival Herzog wrote:
On November 11, 2003 11:39, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
I don't know how to solve your problem, but it would be a good idea if
you just installed
the latest CVS version.
whine
I' just too inexperienced and too isolated to
On Thursday 06 November 2003 03:31 pm, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
War crime tribunals, environmental protection treaties, privacy
legislation, ... the ability to let chilling effects meet little or no
significant organised obstacle has become the trademark of a certain
breed of freedom-loving people.
On Thursday 30 October 2003 04:16 pm, Mike Hearn wrote:
ncalrpc?
The preferred transport for local-to-self RPC/DCOM communications. In NT it's
implemented on top of NT Ports (see Undocumented NT), the advantge being
that this is fast. This RPC transport (but not the NT ports themselves) is
On Thursday 30 October 2003 02:35 pm, Mike Hearn wrote:
Thirdly, Greg recently mentioned stubless proxies. Does anybody know
where I can read about these?
thanks -mike
Unfortunately, there isn't a ton of documentation -- or, more accurately, the
documentation that you may find is scattered
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 03:29 pm, Carlos Lozano wrote:
Hello,
Here goes some notes about how to install installshield 7 programs
with the actual wine releases (sorry, i haven't been able to install
without some natives DLLs).
Could you recommend any particular installer that fails to me
On Saturday 18 October 2003 12:38 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Mike Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alexandre - this is your area. Any ideas?
Your glibc is using TLS. Support for that is not ready yet. Depending
on your system you need to either set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4 or install
another
On Saturday 18 October 2003 02:15 pm, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
On Saturday 18 October 2003 01:57 pm, Steven Edwards wrote:
With this
patch all of the objects for setupapi.dll can be built on
MS_VC with the PSDK. There are a few minor issues but nothing
to major
doesn't this:
-typedef
Does everybody's kernel32 named pipes test pass (in wine)? Named pipes are
acting very wierd here, lots of segfaults and other wierdness... the test
seems to freeze attempting to create the alarmThread in test_NamedPipe_2
(test 3 of 4). The wineserver holds up OK, but the client side looks a
41 matches
Mail list logo
