Jeremy White wrote:
>
>EA Durbin wrote:
>> I just saw this linux distribution on distrowatch. They claim to be able
>> to run all microsoft products. Interesting.
>
>Just for the record, these folks are customers of ours.
>
Thank you for the clarification of your relationship with this company.
>
EA Durbin wrote:
> I just saw this linux distribution on distrowatch. They claim to be able
> to run all microsoft products. Interesting.
Just for the record, these folks are customers of ours.
It is my belief that their distribution of CrossOver complies with all
of the terms of the LGPL; we try
2009/2/9 Remco :
> On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Hin-Tak Leung
> wrote:
>> That's right - GPL allows you to charge for binaries, and any amount for
>> that matter. GPL just means who ever received the binaries are also entitled
>> to the source code, and *also* the right to sell both onward
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
> That's right - GPL allows you to charge for binaries, and any amount for that
> matter. GPL just means who ever received the binaries are also entitled to
> the source code, and *also* the right to sell both onward - and possibly as a
> co
--- On Sat, 7/2/09, Peter Bortas wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Ben Klein
> wrote:
>
> > What it seems to me is that they are selling binaries,
> not support.
> > They could be selling licenses (for Crossover, mp3
> etc), but that's
> > not a matter for us to resolve. If it is determi
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Ben Klein wrote:
> What it seems to me is that they are selling binaries, not support.
> They could be selling licenses (for Crossover, mp3 etc), but that's
> not a matter for us to resolve. If it is determined that what they are
> selling is binaries, then I'm alm
Am Sonntag, den 08.02.2009, 02:57 +1100 schrieb Ben Klein:
> > And even if they are in some way vilolating the GPL by not hosting the
> > operating systems source
>
> Not the problem.
> 1) Source of individual apps can be retrieved from appropriate
> websites. As long as the websites are reference
2009/2/8 Tom Wickline :
> On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Ben Klein wrote:
>>
>> 2009/2/8 Tom Wickline :
>> > And your getting the OS and support with the OS.
>> Wrong. Read the license. They offer absolutely no support for the OS.
>> You're buying the binaries and that's it. (This could be a vio
2009/2/7 Tom Wickline :
> And even if they are in some way vilolating the GPL by not hosting the
> operating systems source
> that has absoloutly nothing to do with Wine... You guy's need to take that
> up with gnu.org
No, that's everyone's business.
- d.
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Ben Klein wrote:
> 2009/2/8 Tom Wickline :
> > And your getting the OS and support with the OS.
> Wrong. Read the license. They offer absolutely no support for the OS.
> You're buying the binaries and that's it. (This could be a violation
> of GPL too)
They have
2009/2/8 Tom Wickline :
> And your getting the OS and support with the OS.
Wrong. Read the license. They offer absolutely no support for the OS.
You're buying the binaries and that's it. (This could be a violation
of GPL too)
> From what Ive read on this thread all your going to do is run reseller
Don't you think you guys are being kinda tough on a CodeWeavers
reseller? and how the HELL is it a rip off? a single copy of CrossOver
pro cost $69.95 retail.. And your getting the OS and support with the OS.
So they bundle a older version of Wine, maybe it's the version that was
current
during th
F.Y.I
Re: Alternative to Vista, iMagic OS
http://www.pcreview.co.uk/forums/thread-3622082.php
MiOS for free!, MiOS will soon be for free
http://www.joejoe.org/forum/index.php?s=cfb4dd58b56fe0a1f7a88fba92e4b16d&showtopic=17629&pid=220433&st=0&#entry220433
MiOS Developer Preview, Request your self
2009/2/7 IneedAname :
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:18:04 -0600
> EA Durbin wrote:
>
>> That and I can't the source code anywhere on their site.
>
> Here is a copy of what I have send to then.
>> I want the source code of the version(s) of Wine you package with your OS.
>> If you have not read Wine's li
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:18:04 -0600
EA Durbin wrote:
> That and I can't the source code anywhere on their site.
Here is a copy of what I have send to then.
> I want the source code of the version(s) of Wine you package with your OS.
> If you have not read Wine's license now is the time to do so.
Oops, forgot to Reply All. Sorry, Austin!
2009/2/7 Austin English :
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Ben Klein wrote:
>> 2009/2/7 Austin English :
>>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Ben Klein wrote:
2009/2/7 EA Durbin :
> I just saw this linux distribution on distrowatch. They claim to
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Ben Klein wrote:
> 2009/2/7 Austin English :
>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Ben Klein wrote:
>>> 2009/2/7 EA Durbin :
I just saw this linux distribution on distrowatch. They claim to be able to
run all microsoft products. Interesting.
http://www.
2009/2/7 Austin English :
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Ben Klein wrote:
>> 2009/2/7 EA Durbin :
>>> I just saw this linux distribution on distrowatch. They claim to be able to
>>> run all microsoft products. Interesting.
>>> http://www.imagicos.com/
>>> http://www.imagicos.com/microsoft.html
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Ben Klein wrote:
> 2009/2/7 EA Durbin :
>> I just saw this linux distribution on distrowatch. They claim to be able to
>> run all microsoft products. Interesting.
>> http://www.imagicos.com/
>> http://www.imagicos.com/microsoft.html
>
> No they don't. It says "almos
EA Durbin wrote:
> I just saw this linux distribution on distrowatch. They claim to be
> able to run all microsoft products. Interesting.
> http://www.imagicos.com/
> http://www.imagicos.com/microsoft.html
>
>
> Windows Live™
That and I can't the source code anywhere on their site.
> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 12:16:09 +1100
> Subject: Re: imagicos
> From: shackl...@gmail.com
> To: ead1...@hotmail.com
> CC: wine-devel@winehq.org
>
> 2009/2/7 EA Durbin :
> > I just saw this linux distributi
2009/2/7 EA Durbin :
> I just saw this linux distribution on distrowatch. They claim to be able to
> run all microsoft products. Interesting.
> http://www.imagicos.com/
> http://www.imagicos.com/microsoft.html
No they don't. It says "almost every" on the home page and "most" on
the "Microsoft" pag
22 matches
Mail list logo
