Re: bugs audit volunteers required

2008-01-02 Thread Kai Blin
On Wednesday 02 January 2008 05:14:00 Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > "Austin English" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Also, marking bugs as having insufficient information to fix advises the > >> reporter that the project > >> needs more information to help or troubleshoot. > > > > Maybe add a resolutio

Re: bugs audit volunteers required

2008-01-01 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Austin English" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Also, marking bugs as having insufficient information to fix advises the >> reporter that the project >> needs more information to help or troubleshoot. > > Maybe add a resolution of NEEDMOREINFO? There is no need to add one more reason for a bug re

Re: bugs audit volunteers required

2008-01-01 Thread James McKenzie
Jan Zerebecki wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 06:49:56PM -0600, Austin English wrote: > >> On Dec 31, 2007 6:42 PM, James McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> I agree. If you cannot find the application or a demo version to work >>> with, how can you fix the >>> bug. Logs and other

Re: bugs audit volunteers required

2008-01-01 Thread Austin English
On Jan 1, 2008 9:33 AM, Jan Zerebecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We could add flags for "needs more information" and perhaps one > for "reproducible bug report with enough initial information". > > (A flag is something that can be requested to be set and can then > be granted or denied by someone

Re: bugs audit volunteers required

2008-01-01 Thread Jan Zerebecki
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 06:49:56PM -0600, Austin English wrote: > On Dec 31, 2007 6:42 PM, James McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree. If you cannot find the application or a demo version to work > > with, how can you fix the > > bug. Logs and other helpers go a long way. Maybe an int

Re: bugs audit volunteers required

2008-01-01 Thread Jan Zerebecki
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 05:49:14PM -0700, James McKenzie wrote: > Austin English wrote: > > On Dec 31, 2007 6:10 PM, Maarten Lankhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The situation isn't improved by the fact that bugs are reopened by those > >> persons after minimal additions. Perhaps we should hav

Re: bugs audit volunteers required

2007-12-31 Thread Vijay Kiran Kamuju
On Dec 31, 2007 6:49 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 31, 2007 6:42 PM, James McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree. If you cannot find the application or a demo version to work > > with, how can you fix the > > bug. Logs and other helpers go a long way. Maybe a

Re: bugs audit volunteers required

2007-12-31 Thread Austin English
On Dec 31, 2007 6:42 PM, James McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree. If you cannot find the application or a demo version to work > with, how can you fix the > bug. Logs and other helpers go a long way. Maybe an intro page as to > what is needed and how > to get it. This will become mo

Re: bugs audit volunteers required

2007-12-31 Thread James McKenzie
Austin English wrote: > On Dec 31, 2007 6:10 PM, Maarten Lankhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The situation isn't improved by the fact that bugs are reopened by those >> persons after minimal additions. Perhaps we should have a bug >> moderation? Only allow bugs that follow the criterion, t

Re: bugs audit volunteers required

2007-12-31 Thread James McKenzie
Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Vijay Kiran Kamuju schreef: > >> just like last year we did an audit of all the bugs in bugzilla. >> I think this year also we should do the same, the bugs are growing >> large and older bugs are being neglected. >> just wanted to say that we need to check all the ol

Re: bugs audit volunteers required

2007-12-31 Thread Austin English
On Dec 31, 2007 5:56 PM, Vijay Kiran Kamuju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We would be doing this for 1-2 months as the Wine 1.0 release might > happen in may be next 6-7 months time. We might expect lotta bugzilla > activity as wine goes out of beta. > and all the old bugs will be ignored and bugs g

Re: bugs audit volunteers required

2007-12-31 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Vijay Kiran Kamuju schreef: > just like last year we did an audit of all the bugs in bugzilla. > I think this year also we should do the same, the bugs are growing > large and older bugs are being neglected. > just wanted to say that we need to check all the old open bugs, and > test them/ask the

Re: bugs audit volunteers required

2007-12-31 Thread Vijay Kiran Kamuju
On Dec 31, 2007 5:19 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been doing this a little bit at a time for a while. I just wanted > to check base and make sure all on the same page. For starters, here's > a search of all bugs not touched in 6 months: > http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?q

Re: bugs audit volunteers required

2007-12-31 Thread Austin English
I've been doing this a little bit at a time for a while. I just wanted to check base and make sure all on the same page. For starters, here's a search of all bugs not touched in 6 months: http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=Win